Modeling of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Based on Structural Connectivity from DTI: Comparison with EEG Derived Phase Coupling Networks and Evaluation of Alternative Methods along the Modeling Path

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Finger, Holger ^a,b   Bönstrup, Marlene ^b   Cheng, Bastian ^b   Messé, Arnaud ^b   Hilgetag, Claus ^b   Thomalla, Götz ^b   Gerloff, Christian ^b   König, Peter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPUTATION THEORY; LOCKS (FASTENERS); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEURAL NETWORKS; NEURONS; TENSORS;

COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; CONNECTOMES; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; LARGE-SCALES; MODEL FIT; MODEL-BASED OPC; SIMPLE++; STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY; STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP; ZERO PHASE-LAG;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH RECORDING; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEUROIMAGING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WHITE MATTER; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET;

EID: 84988912067     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005025     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Zacks JM, Raichle ME, Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nature neuroscience. 2006;9(1):23–25. doi: 10.1038/nn161616341210
2. Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A, Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science. 1996;273(5283):1868–1871. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5283.18688791593
3. Steriade M, Nunez A, Amzica F, A novel slow (<1 Hz) oscillation of neocortical neurons in vivo: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing components. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1993;13(8):3252–3265. 8340806
4. Contreras D, Steriade M, State-dependent fluctuations of low-frequency rhythms in corticothalamic networks. Neuroscience. 1996;76(1):25–38. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00392-2
5. Destexhe A, Contreras D, Steriade M, Spatiotemporal analysis of local field potentials and unit discharges in cat cerebral cortex during natural wake and sleep states. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;19(11):4595–4608. 10341257
6. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS, Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 1995;34(4):537–541. doi: 10.1002/mrm.19103404098524021
7. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL, A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(2):676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
8. Brookes MJ, Hale JR, Zumer JM, Stevenson CM, Francis ST, Barnes GR, et al. Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI. Neuroimage. 2011;56(3):1082–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.05421352925
9. Hipp JF, Hawellek DJ, Corbetta M, Siegel M, Engel AK, Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nature neuroscience. 2012;15(6):884–890. doi: 10.1038/nn.310122561454
10. Engel AK, Gerloff C, Hilgetag CC, Nolte G, Intrinsic coupling modes: multiscale interactions in ongoing brain activity. Neuron. 2013;80(4):867–886. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.03824267648
11. Mantini D, Perrucci MG, Del Gratta C, Romani GL, Corbetta M, Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(32):13170–13175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700668104
12. Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF, Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cerebral cortex. 2009;19(1):72–78. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn05918403396
13. Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran JP, Meuli R, et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(6):2035–2040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106
14. Skudlarski P, Jagannathan K, Calhoun VD, Hampson M, Skudlarska BA, Pearlson G, Measuring brain connectivity: diffusion tensor imaging validates resting state temporal correlations. Neuroimage. 2008;43(3):554–561. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.06318771736
15. Goñi J, van den Heuvel MP, Avena-Koenigsberger A, de Mendizabal NV, Betzel RF, Griffa A, et al. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(2):833–838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315529111
16. Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Honey CJ, Wedeen VJ, et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(7):e159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.006015918597554
17. Garcés P, Pereda E, Hernández-Tamames JA, Del-Pozo F, Maestú F, Ángel Pineda-Pardo J, Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI. Human brain mapping. 2015;.
18. Chu C, Tanaka N, Diaz J, Edlow B, Wu O, Hämäläinen M, et al. EEG functional connectivity is partially predicted by underlying white matter connectivity. Neuroimage. 2015;108:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.03325534110
19. Vincent J, Patel G, Fox M, Snyder A, Baker J, Van Essen D, et al. Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature. 2007;447(7140):83–86. doi: 10.1038/nature0575817476267
20. Hermundstad AM, Bassett DS, Brown KS, Aminoff EM, Clewett D, Freeman S, et al. Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(15):6169–6174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219562110
21. Cabral J, Luckhoo H, Woolrich M, Joensson M, Mohseni H, Baker A, et al. Exploring mechanisms of spontaneous functional connectivity in MEG: how delayed network interactions lead to structured amplitude envelopes of band-pass filtered oscillations. Neuroimage. 2014;90:423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.04724321555
22. Cabral J, Hugues E, Sporns O, Deco G, Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2011;57(1):130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.01021511044
23. Izhikevich EM, Edelman GM, Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2008;105(9):3593–3598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712231105
24. Messé A, Rudrauf D, Benali H, Marrelec G, Relating structure and function in the human brain: relative contributions of anatomy, stationary dynamics, and non-stationarities. PLoS computational biology. 2014;10(3):e1003530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100353024651524
25. Messe A, Benali H, Marrelec G, Relating structural and functional connectivity in MRI: A simple model for a complex brain. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on. 2015;34(1):27–37. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2341732
26. Messé A, Rudrauf D, Giron A, Marrelec G, Predicting functional connectivity from structural connectivity via computational models using MRI: an extensive comparison study. NeuroImage. 2015;111:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.00125682944
27. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V, Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(1):253–258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100
28. de Pasquale F, Della Penna S, Snyder AZ, Lewis C, Mantini D, Marzetti L, et al. Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(13):6040–6045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913863107
29. Singer W, Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations?Neuron. 1999;24(1):49–65. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80821-110677026
30. Fries P, Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annual review of neuroscience. 2009;32:209–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.13560319400723
31. Engel AK, Fries P, Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo?Current opinion in neurobiology. 2010;20(2):156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.01520359884
32. Siegel M, Donner TH, Engel AK, Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2012;13(2):121–134. 22233726
33. Hipp JF, Engel AK, Siegel M, Oscillatory synchronization in large-scale cortical networks predicts perception. Neuron. 2011;69(2):387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.02721262474
34. Hummel F, Gerloff C, Larger interregional synchrony is associated with greater behavioral success in a complex sensory integration task in humans. Cerebral Cortex. 2005;15(5):670–678. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh17015342429
35. Deco G, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR, Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011;12(1):43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrn296121170073
36. Engel AK, König P, Kreiter AK, Singer W, Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science. 1991;252(5009):1177–1179. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.11772031188
37. Bullmore E, Sporns O, Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10(3):186–198. doi: 10.1038/nrn257519190637
38. Li L, Rilling JK, Preuss TM, Glasser MF, Damen FW, Hu X, Quantitative assessment of a framework for creating anatomical brain networks via global tractography. NeuroImage. 2012;61(4):1017–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.07122484406
39. Wedeen VJ, Wang R, Schmahmann JD, Benner T, Tseng W, Dai G, et al. Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers. Neuroimage. 2008;41(4):1267–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.03618495497
40. Li L, Rilling JK, Preuss TM, Glasser MF, Hu X, The effects of connection reconstruction method on the interregional connectivity of brain networks via diffusion tractography. Human brain mapping. 2012;33(8):1894–1913. doi: 10.1002/hbm.2133221928316
41. Ritter P, Schirner M, McIntosh AR, Jirsa VK, The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain connectivity. 2013;3(2):121–145. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.012023442172
42. Bojak I, Oostendorp TF, Reid AT, Kötter R, Connecting mean field models of neural activity to EEG and fMRI data. Brain topography. 2010;23(2):139–149. doi: 10.1007/s10548-010-0140-320364434
43. Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A, Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Human brain mapping. 2007;28(11):1178–1193. doi: 10.1002/hbm.2034617266107
44. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):968–980. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.02116530430
45. Sturm AK, König P, Mechanisms to synchronize neuronal activity. Biological cybernetics. 2001;84(3):153–172. doi: 10.1007/s00422000020911252634
46. Cheng B, Braass H, Ganos C, Treszl A, Biermann-Ruben K, Hummel FC, et al. Altered intrahemispheric structural connectivity in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2014;4:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.011
47. Cabral J, Kringelbach ML, Deco G, Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Progress in neurobiology. 2014;114:102–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.12.00524389385
48. Breakspear M, Heitmann S, Daffertshofer A, Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological implications of the Kuramoto model. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2010;4. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.0019021151358
49. Tononi G, Sporns O, Edelman GM, A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994;91(11):5033–5037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033
50. Van Veen BD, Van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A, Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 1997;44(9):867–880. doi: 10.1109/10.623056
51. Hindriks R, Woolrich M, Luckhoo H, Joensson M, Mohseni H, Kringelbach M, et al. Role of white-matter pathways in coordinating alpha oscillations in resting visual cortex. NeuroImage. 2015;106:328–339. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.05725449741
52. Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CM, An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage. 2011;55(4):1548–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.05521276857
53. Rappelsberger P, Pfurtscheller G, Filz O, Calculation of event-related coherence—a new method to study short-lasting coupling between brain areas. Brain topography. 1994;7(2):121–127. doi: 10.1007/BF011867707696089
54. Andrew C, Pfurtscheller G, Event-related coherence as a tool for studying dynamic interaction of brain regions. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1996;98(2):144–148. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00228-68598174
55. Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, et al. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain. 2006;129(3):791–808. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh71316364955
56. Manganotti P, Gerloff C, Toro C, Katsuta H, Sadato N, Zhuang Pa, et al. Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control. 1998;109(1):50–62. doi: 10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00074-X11003064
57. Wu J, Srinivasan R, Kaur A, Cramer SC, Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition. NeuroImage. 2014;91:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.02624473097
58. Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, Al-Hashimi O, Faraji F, Janowich J, et al. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature. 2013;501(7465):97–101. doi: 10.1038/nature1248624005416
59. Niso G, Carrasco S, Gudín M, Maestú F, del Pozo F, Pereda E, What graph theory actually tells us about resting state interictal MEG epileptic activity. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2015;. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.008
60. Jbabdi S, Johansen-Berg H, Tractography: where do we go from here?Brain connectivity. 2011;1(3):169–183. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.003322433046
61. Bullmore E, Sporns O, The economy of brain network organization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2012;13(5):336–349. 22498897
62. Betzel RF, Avena-Koenigsberger A, Goñi J, He Y, de Reus MA, Griffa A, et al. Generative models of the human connectome. Neuroimage. 2016;124:1054–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.04126427642
63. Rubinov M, Sporns O, Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010;52(3):1059–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.00319819337
64. Newman ME, The mathematics of networks. The new palgrave encyclopedia of economics. 2008;2(2008):1–12.
65. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. nature. 1998;393(6684):440–442. 9623998
66. Cheng H, Wang Y, Sheng J, Kronenberger WG, Mathews VP, Hummer TA, et al. Characteristics and variability of structural networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2012;61(4):1153–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.03622450298
67. Leon PS, Knock SA, Woodman MM, Domide L, Mersmann J, McIntosh AR, et al. The Virtual Brain: a simulator of primate brain network dynamics. Frontiers in neuroinformatics. 2013;7.
68. Kuramoto Y, Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence. vol. 19. Springer; 1984
69. Finger H, König P, Phase synchrony facilitates binding and segmentation of natural images in a coupled neural oscillator network. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2013;7(195). doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.0019524478685
70. Yeung MS, Strogatz SH, Time delay in the Kuramoto model of coupled oscillators. Physical Review Letters. 1999;82(3):648. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.648
71. Oostenveld R, Stegeman DF, Praamstra P, van Oosterom A, Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials. Clinical neurophysiology. 2003;114(7):1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00059-212842715
72. Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koukkou M, Kochi K, Anderer P, Saletu B, et al. Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2011;369(1952):3768–3784. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0081
73. Steinmann S, Leicht G, Ertl M, Andreou C, Polomac N, Westerhausen R, et al. Conscious auditory perception related to long-range synchrony of gamma oscillations. NeuroImage. 2014;100:435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.01224945670
74. Vecchio F, Miraglia F, Curcio G, Della Marca G, Vollono C, Mazzucchi E, et al. Cortical connectivity in fronto-temporal focal epilepsy from EEG analysis: A study via graph theory. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015;126(6):1108–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.01925449555
75. Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR, Buckner RL, Belliveau JW, Lewine JD, et al. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron. 2000;26(1):55–67. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81138-110798392
76. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ, et al. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human brain mapping. 1999;8(4):194–208. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4%3C194::AID-HBM4%3E3.0.CO;2-C10619414
77. Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M, Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clinical neurophysiology. 2004;115(10):2292–2307. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.02915351371
78. Pascual-Marqui RD, Instantaneous and lagged measurements of linear and nonlinear dependence between groups of multivariate time series: frequency decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:07111455. 2007;.
79. Hindriks R, van Putten MJ, Deco G, Intra-cortical propagation of EEG alpha oscillations. Neuroimage. 2014;103:444–453. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.02725168275
80. Supekar K, Uddin LQ, Prater K, Amin H, Greicius MD, Menon V, Development of functional and structural connectivity within the default mode network in young children. Neuroimage. 2010;52(1):290–301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.00920385244
81. Zalesky A, Fornito A, Harding IH, Cocchi L, Yücel M, Pantelis C, et al. Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?Neuroimage. 2010;50(3):970–983. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.02720035887
82. Zhong S, He Y, Gong G, Convergence and divergence across construction methods for human brain white matter networks: An assessment based on individual differences. Human brain mapping. 2015;36(5):1995–2013. doi: 10.1002/hbm.2275125641208
83. Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Barnes KA, Church JA, et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron. 2011;72(4):665–678. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.00622099467
84. Ton R, Deco G, Daffertshofer A, Structure-Function Discrepancy: Inhomogeneity and Delays in Synchronized Neural Networks. PLoS Computational Biology. 2014;10(7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100373625078715
85. Sporns O, Tononi G, Edelman GM, Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. Cerebral Cortex. 2000;10(2):127–141. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.2.12710667981
86. Barnett L, Buckley CL, Bullock S, Neural complexity and structural connectivity. Physical Review E. 2009;79(5):051914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051914
87. Villegas P, Moretti P, Muñoz MA, Frustrated hierarchical synchronization and emergent complexity in the human connectome network. Scientific reports. 2014;4. doi: 10.1038/srep05990
88. Sadilek M, Thurner S, Physiologically motivated multiplex Kuramoto model describes phase diagram of cortical activity. Scientific reports. 2015;5. doi: 10.1038/srep1001525996547
89. Váša F, Shanahan M, Hellyer PJ, Scott G, Cabral J, Leech R, Effects of lesions on synchrony and metastability in cortical networks. NeuroImage. 2015;.
90. Schirner M, Rothmeier S, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR, Ritter P, An automated pipeline for constructing personalized virtual brains from multimodal neuroimaging data. NeuroImage. 2015;. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.05525837600
91. Vindiola M, Vettel J, Gordon S, Franaszczuk P, McDowell K, Applying EEG phase synchronization measures to non-linearly coupled neural mass models. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2014;226:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.01.02524485868
92. Greenblatt R, Pflieger M, Ossadtchi A, Connectivity measures applied to human brain electrophysiological data. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2012;207(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.02522426415
93. Krusienski DJ, McFarland DJ, Wolpaw JR, Value of amplitude, phase, and coherence features for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface. Brain research bulletin. 2012;87(1):130–134. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.09.01921985984
94. Khadem A, Hossein-Zadeh GA, Quantification of the effects of volume conduction on the EEG/MEG connectivity estimates: an index of sensitivity to brain interactions. Physiological measurement. 2014;35(10):2149. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/10/214925243864
95. Zhang C, Yu X, Yang Y, Xu L, Phase Synchronization and Spectral Coherence Analysis of EEG Activity During Mental Fatigue. Clinical EEG and neuroscience. 2014;p. 1550059413503961.
96. Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG. Oxford university press; 2006.
97. Stinstra J, Peters M, The volume conductor may act as a temporal filter on the ECG and EEG. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 1998;36(6):711–716. doi: 10.1007/BF0251887310367461
98. Roelfsema PR, Engel AK, König P, Singer W, Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature. 1997;385:157–161. doi: 10.1038/385157a08990118
99. Campo AT, Martinez-Garcia M, Nácher V, Luna R, Romo R, Deco G, Task-driven intra-and interarea communications in primate cerebral cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(15):4761–4766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503937112
100. Gregoriou GG, Gotts SJ, Zhou H, Desimone R, Long-range neural coupling through synchronization with attention. Progress in brain research. 2009;176:35–45. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17603-319733748
101. Schoffelen JM, Gross J, Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Human brain mapping. 2009;30(6):1857–1865. doi: 10.1002/hbm.2074519235884