Neural complexity and structural connectivity

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Barnett, L ^a   Buckley, C L ^a   Bullock, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY SUBSYSTEMS; COMPLEXITY MEASURES; CONTINUOUS TIME; GAUSSIAN MODEL; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; NEURAL COMPLEXITY; NEURAL SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY; SYSTEM SIZE; WEAKLY COUPLED SYSTEMS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 67549119293     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051914     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. G. Tononi, O. Sporns, and G. M. Edelman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 5033 (1994). 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033
2. G. Tononi, G. M. Edelman, and O. Sporns, Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 474 (1998). 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01259-5
3. A. K. Seth and G. M. Edelman, Adapt. Behav. 12, 5 (2004). 10.1177/105971230401200103
4. K. J. Friston, G. Tononi, O. Sporns, and G. M. Edelman, Hum. Brain Mapp. 3, 302 (1995). 10.1002/hbm.460030405
5. C. J. Stam, Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 2266 (2005). 10.1016/j.clinph.2005. 06.011
6. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and G. M. Edelman, Neural Networks 13, 909 (2000). 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00053-8
7. G. Tononi and G. M. Edelman, Science 282, 1846 (1998). 10.1126/science.282.5395.1846
8. A. K. Seth, E. M. Izhikevich, G. N. Reeke, and G. M. Edelman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 10799 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0604347103
9. M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003). 10.1137/S003614450342480
10. M. De Lucia, M. Bottaccio, M. Montuori, and L. Pietronero, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016114 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016114
11. M. P. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. E 78, 041924 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78. 041924
12. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and G. M. Edelman, Cereb. Cortex 10, 127 (2000). 10.1093/cercor/10.2.127
13. A. K. Seth, B. J. Baars, and G. M. Edelman, Conscious Cogn 14, 119 (2005). 10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.006
14. B. J. Baars, T. Ramsoy, and S. Laureys, Trends Neurosci. 26, 671 (2003). 10.1016/j.tins.2003.09.015
15. We remark that the measure has been extended to incorporate explicit extrinsic inputs.
16. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Biophys. J. 12, 1 (1972). 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86068-5
17. P. L. Nunez, Math. Biosci. 21, 279 (1974). 10.1016/0025-5564(74)90020-0
18. W. J. Freeman, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 34, 9 (1978).
19. A. R. McIntosh and F. Gonzalez-Lima, Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 2 (1994). 10.1002/hbm.460020104
20. O. Sporns and G. Tononi, Complexity 7, 28 (2002). 10.1002/cplx.10015
21. P. L. Nunez and R. Srinivasan, Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 2424 (2006). 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.754
22. L. Barnett, C. L. Buckley, and S. Bullock, MATLAB® routines for neural complexity analysis (2009), http://www.secse.net/ncomp/ncomp-tools.zip.
23. G. Tononi, O. Sporns, and G. M. Edelman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 3422 (1996). 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3422
24. G. Tononi, O. Sporns, and G. M. Edelman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 3257 (1999). 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3257
25. In this paper we consider X (t) as a row vector. The " " symbol denotes matrix transpose.
26. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1991).
27. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985).
28. We note that any positive-definite matrix can be a covariance matrix and that, furthermore, any positive-definite matrix may be written as the Gram matrix X X of a set of vectors X.
29. The C and X appear to be incorrectly reversed on the right-hand side of the equivalent equation in.
30. G. E. Uhlenbeck and L. S. Ornstein, Phys. Rev. 36, 823 (1930). 10.1103/PhysRev.36.823
31. B. K. Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction With Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1998).
32. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Kybernetika 13, 55 (1973). 10.1007/BF00288786
33. R. F. Galán, PLoS One 3, e2148 (2008). 10.1371/journal.pone. 0002148
34. R. D. Beer, Adapt. Behav. 3, 469 (1995). 10.1177/105971239500300405
35. R. D. Beer, Neural Comput. 18, 3009 (2006). 10.1162/neco.2006.18.12.3009
36. W. C. Schieve, A. R. Bulsara, and G. M. Davis, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2613 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2613
37. We may use Gelfand's theorem with any consistent matrix norm.
38. R. M. Gray, Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review (Now, Boston, 2006).
39. L. Barnett, C. L. Buckley, and S. Bullock, On a Graph Theoretic Interpretation of Neural Complexity (unpublished).
40. Note that this is not the same as normalization by the spectral norm of C, which is defined as the square root of the maximum eigenvalue of C C.
41. G. Turrigiano, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 318 (2007). 10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.004
42. I. Rabinowitch and I. Segev, Trends Neurosci. 31, 377 (2008). 10.1016/j.tins.2008.05.005
43. Note that for complex eigenvalues this still follows since complex eigenvalues always come in conjugate pairs.
44. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998). 10.1038/30918
45. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and G. M. Edelman, Behav. Brain Res. 135, 69 (2002). 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00157-2
46. O. Sporns, BioSystems 85, 55 (2006). 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.02.008
47. C. C. Hilgetag, G. A. Burns, M. A. O'Neil, J. W. Scannel, and M. P. Young, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 355, 91 (2000). 10.1098/rstb.2000.0551
48. C. L. Buckley and S. Bullock, in Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Life, edited by, F. Almeida e Costa, (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
49. URL: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14282/.
50. C. C. Hilgetag, M. A. O'Neil, and M. P. Young, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 355, 71 (2000). 10.1098/rstb.2000.0550
51. D. T. Gillespie, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2084 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2084