Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 369, Issue 1952, 2011, Pages 3768-3784

  Pascual Marqui, Roberto D ^a,b   Lehmann, Dietrich ^a   Koukkou, Martha ^a   Kochi, Kieko ^a   Anderer, Peter ^c   Saletu, Bernd ^c   Tanaka, Hideaki ^d   Hirata, Koichi ^d   John, E Roy ^e,f   Prichep, Leslie ^e,f   Biscay Lirio, Rolando ^g,h   Kinoshita, Toshihiko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PSYCHIATRY   (Switzerland)

^b KANSAI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d DOKKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^g INSTITUTO DE CIBERNÉTICA   (Cuba)

^h UNIVERSIDAD DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

Author keywords

Electroencephalogram; Exact low resolution electromagnetic tomography; Functional connectivity; Low resolution electromagnetic tomography

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PHYSIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; IMPRESSED CURRENT; NEURO-IMAGING; NONINVASIVE METHODS; PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL ORIGIN; PYRAMIDAL NEURON; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TIME-RESOLUTION; VOLUME CONDUCTION;

ELECTROMAGNETISM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; CYTOLOGY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY;

BRAIN; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 80054999115     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0081     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lehmann, D. 1987 Principles of spatial analysis. In Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology (eds A. Gevins & A. Remond), pp. 309-354. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Saletu, B., Anderer, P. & Saletu-Zyhlarz, G. M. 2006 EEG topography and tomography (LORETA) in the classification and evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of psychotropic drugs. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 37, 66-80. (Pubitemid 43726199)
3. John, E. R., Prichep, L. S., Fridman, J. & Easton, P. 1988 Neurometrics: computer-assisted differential diagnosis of brain dysfunctions. Science 239, 162-169. (doi:10.1126/science.3336779) (Pubitemid 18026016)
4. Mitzdorf, U. 1985 Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol. Rev. 65, 37-100. (Pubitemid 15165385)
5. Martin, J. H. 1991 The collective electrical behavior of cortical neurons: the electroencephalogram and the mechanisms of epilepsy. In Principles of neural science (eds E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz & T. M. Jessell), pp. 777-791. New York, NY: Elsevier.
6. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. 2009 Theory of the EEG inverse problem. In Quantitative EEG analysis: methods and clinical applications (eds S. Tong & N. Thakor), pp. 121-140. Boston: Artech House.
7. Sarvas, J. 1987 Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32, 11-22. (doi:10.1088/0031-9155/ 32/1/004) (Pubitemid 17039071)
8. Fuchs, M., Kastner, J., Wagner, M., Hawes, S. & Ebersole, J. S. 2002 A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 702-712. (doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00030-5) (Pubitemid 34439274)
9. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. 1999 Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem. Int. J. Bioelectromagnetism 1, 75-86.
10. Ary, J. P., Klein, S. A. & Fender, D. H. 1981 Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials: corrections for skull and scalp thicknesses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 28, 447-452. (doi:10.1109/TBME.1981.324817) (Pubitemid 11043862)
11. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T. & Bibby, J. M. 1979 Multivariate analysis. London, NY: Academic Press.
12. Lehmann, D. & Skrandies, W. 1980 Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 48, 609-621. (doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80) 90419-8) (Pubitemid 10091391)
13. Hounsfield, G. N. 1995 Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system. Br. J. Radiol. 68, H166-H172.
14. (Reprinted from Br. J. Radiol. 46, 1016-1022, 1973)
15. Helmholtz, H. 1853 Ueber einige gesetze der vertheilung elektrischer strome in korperlichen leitern, mit anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen versuche. Ann. Phys. Chem. 89, 211-233; 353-357. (doi:10.1002/andp.18531650603)
16. Tikhonov, A. & Arsenin, V. 1977 Solutions to ill-posed problems. Washington, DC: Winston.
17. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. 1995 Reply to comments by Hämälä inen, Ilmoniemi, and Nunez. In Source localization: continuing discussion of the inverse problem (ed. W. Skrandies), ISBET newsletter no. 6, pp. 16-28.
18. Tarantola, A. 2005 Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
19. Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Vega-Hernandez, M., Sanchez-Bornot, J. M., Martinez-Montes, E. & Bobes, M. A. 2009 EEG source imaging with spatio-temporal tomographic nonnegative independent component analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1898-1910. (doi:10.1002/hbm.20784)
20. Rao, C. R. & Mitra, S. K. 1973 Theory and application of constrained inverse of matrices. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 24, 473-488.
21. Hamalainen, M. S. & Ilmoniemi, R. J. 1984 Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions. Espoo, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology.
22. Axler, S., Bourdon, P. & Ramey, W. 1992 Harmonic function theory. New York, NY: Springer.
23. Hauk, O. 2004 Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage 21, 1612-1621. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.018) (Pubitemid 38446585)
24. Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M. & Lehmann, D. 1994 Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 18, 49-65. (doi:10.1016/0167- 8760(84)90014-X) (Pubitemid 24344515)
25. Hamalainen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J. & Lounasmaa, O. V. 1993 Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 413-497. (doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.4133)
26. Grova, C., Daunizeau, J., Lina, J. M., Benar, C. G., Benali, H. & Gotman, J. 2006 Evaluation of EEG localization methods using realistic simulations of interictal spikes. Neuroimage 29, 734-753. (doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2005.08.053) (Pubitemid 43121199)
27. Lin, F. H., Witzel, T., Ahlfors, S. P., Stufflebeam, S. M., Belliveau, J. W. & Hamalainen, M. S. 2006 Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 31, 160-171. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage. 2005.11.054) (Pubitemid 43728995)
28. Dale, A. M., Liu, A. K., Fischl, B. R., Buckner, R. L., Belliveau, J. W., Lewine, J. D. & Halgren, E. 2000 Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26, 55-67. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81138-1)
29. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. 2002 Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24(Suppl D), 5-12. (Pubitemid 35462350)
30. Sekihara, K., Sahani, M. & Nagarajan, S. S. 2005 Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. Neuroimage 25, 1056-1067. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004. 11.051) (Pubitemid 40591648)
31. Greenblatt, R. E., Ossadtchi, A. & Pflieger, M. E. 2005 Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 53, 3403-3412. (doi:10.1109/TSP.2005.853201) (Pubitemid 41555628)
32. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. 2007 Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: exact, zero error localization. (http://arxiv.org/pdf/0710.3341)
33. Kucukaltum-Yildirim, E., Pantazis, D. & Leahy, R. M. 2006 Task-based comparison of inverse methods in magnetoencephalography. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 53, 1783-1793. (doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.873747) (Pubitemid 44285906)
34. Worsley, K. J., Chen, J.-I., Lerch, J. & Evans, A. C. 2005 Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 913-920. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1637) (Pubitemid 41672854)
35. Quiroga, R. Q., Kraskov, A., Kreuz, T. & Grassberger, P. 2002 Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. Phys. Rev. E. 65, 041903. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevE.65.041903) (Pubitemid 40618858)
36. Dauwels, J., Vialatte, F., Musha, T. & Cichocki, A. 2010 A comparative study of synchrony measures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on EEG. Neuroimage 49, 668-693. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06. 056)
37. Brillinger, D. R. 1981 Time series: data analysis and theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
38. Nolte, G., Bai, O., Wheaton, L., Mari, Z., Vorbach, S. & Hallett, M. 2004 Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 2292-2307, (doi:10.1016/jclinph.2004.04. 029) (Pubitemid 39200796)
39. Stam, C. J., Nolte, G. & Daffertshofer, A. 2007 Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 1178-1193. (doi:10.1002/hbm.20346) (Pubitemid 350077482)
40. Geweke, J. 1982 Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 304-313. (doi:10.2307/2287238)
41. Parzen, E. 1982 Comment on J. Geweke's 'Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series'. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 320-322. (doi:10.2307/2287242)
42. Pierce, D. A. 1982 Comment on J. Geweke's 'Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series'. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 315-316. (doi:10.2307/2287240)
43. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. 2007 Instantaneous and lagged measurements of linear and nonlinear dependence between groups of multivariate time series: frequency decomposition. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1455)
44. Yamashita, O., Galka, A., Ozaki, T., Biscay, R. & Valdes-Sosa, P. 2004 Recursive penalized least squares solution for dynamical inverse problems of EEG generation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 221-235. (doi:10.1002/hbm.20000) (Pubitemid 38468836)
45. Galka, A., Yamashita, O., Ozaki, T., Biscay, R. & Valdes-Sosa, P. 2004 A solution to the dynamical inverse problem of EEG generation using spatiotemporal Kalman filtering. Neuroimage 23, 435-453. (doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2004.02.022) (Pubitemid 39370596)
46. Kaminski, M., Ding, M. Z., Truccolo, W. A. & Bressler, S. L. 2001 Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol. Cybern. 85, 145-157. (doi:10.1007/s004220000235) (Pubitemid 33605209)
47. Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Lehmann, D., Koenig, T., Kochi, K., Merlo, M. C., Hell, D. & Koukkou, M. 1999 Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 90, 169-179. (doi:10.1016/S0925- 4927(99)00013-X) (Pubitemid 29349649)
48. Mulert, C., Kirsch, V., Pascual-Marqui, R., McCarley, R. W. & Spencer, K. M. 2011 Long-range synchrony of gamma oscillations and auditory hallucination symptoms in schizophrenia. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 79, 55-63. (doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.08.004)
49. Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. 2009 Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186-198. (doi:10.1038/nrn2575)
50. Calhoun, V. D., Liu, J. & Adali, T. 2009 A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. Neuroimage 45, S163-S172. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.057)