Transcription factors dynamically control the spatial organization of the yeast genome

Nucleus

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 369-374

  Randise Hinchliff, Carlo ^a   Brickner, Jason H ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

chromatin; histone deacetylase; interchromosomal clustering; lamina; nuclear periphery; nuclear pore complex; transcription, transcription factor; transcriptional repressor; translational regulation

Indexed keywords

CIS ACTING ELEMENT; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; MESSENGER RNA; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CBF1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GCN4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PUT3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE12; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FUNGAL PROTEIN;

CHROMATIN; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; PHOSPHORYLATION; REPRESSOR GENE; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSLATION REGULATION; UPREGULATION; YEAST; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOLOGY; FUNGAL GENE; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

CELL NUCLEUS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENES, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; YEASTS;

EID: 84988527272     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2016.1212797     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. M.R.Hubner, M.A.Eckersley-Maslin, D.L.Spector. Chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23:89-95; PMID:23270812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.006
2. L.Guelen, L.Pagie, E.Brasset, W.Meuleman, M.B.Faza, W.Talhout, B.H.Eussen, A.de Klein, L.Wessels, W.de Laat, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008; 453:948-51; PMID:18463634; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06947
3. D.Egecioglu, J.H.Brickner. Gene positioning and expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23:338-45; PMID:21292462; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.01.001
4. H.Lee, J.C.Quinn, K.V.Prasanth, V.A.Swiss, K.D.Economides, M.M.Camacho, D.L.Spector, C.Abate-Shen. PIAS1 confers DNA-binding specificity on the Msx1 homeoprotein. Genes Dev 2006; 20:784-94; PMID:16600910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1392006
5. T.Ragoczy, M.A.Bender, A.Telling, R.Byron, M.Groudine. The locus control region is required for association of the murine β-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1447-57; PMID:16705039; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1419506
6. B.Kalverda, H.Pickersgill, V.V.Shloma, M.Fornerod. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010; 140:360-71; PMID:20144760; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.011
7. C.Randise-Hinchliff, R.Coukos, V.Sood, M.C.Sumner, S.Zdraljevic, L.Meldi Sholl, D.Garvey Brickner, S.Ahmed, L.Watchmaker, J.H.Brickner. Strategies to regulate transcription factor-mediated gene positioning and interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. J Cell Biol 2016; 212:633-46; PMID:26953353; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201508068
8. J.H.Brickner, P.Walter. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:e342; PMID:15455074; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020342
9. J.M.Casolari, C.R.Brown, S.Komili, J.West, H.Hieronymus, P.A.Silver. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004; 117:427-39; PMID:15137937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00448-9
10. S.Rohner, V.Kalck, X.Wang, K.Ikegami, J.D.Lieb, S.M.Gasser, P.Meister. Promoter- and RNA polymerase II-dependent hsp-16 gene association with nuclear pores in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 2013; 200:589-604; PMID:23460676; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201207024
11. A.Taddei, G.Van Houwe, F.Hediger, V.Kalck, F.Cubizolles, H.Schober, S.M.Gasser. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 2006; 441:774-8; PMID:16760983; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04845
12. D.G.Brickner, I.Cajigas, Y.Fondufe-Mittendorf, S.Ahmed, P.C.Lee, J.Widom, J.H.Brickner. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e81; PMID:17373856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050081
13. S.Ahmed, D.G.Brickner, W.H.Light, I.Cajigas, M.McDonough, A.B.Froyshteter, T.Volpe, J.H.Brickner. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:111-8; PMID:20098417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2011
14. M.Capelson, Y.Liang, R.Schulte, W.Mair, U.Wagner, M.W.Hetzer. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010; 140:372-83; PMID:20144761; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.054
15. J.M.Brown, J.Leach, J.E.Reittie, A.Atzberger, J.Lee-Prudhoe, W.G.Wood, D.R.Higgs, F.J.Iborra, V.J.Buckle. Coregulated human globin genes are frequently in spatial proximity when active. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:177-87; PMID:16418531; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200507073
16. S.Schoenfelder, T.Sexton, L.Chakalova, N.F.Cope, A.Horton, S.Andrews, S.Kurukuti, J.A.Mitchell, D.Umlauf, D.S.Dimitrova, et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010; 42:53-61; PMID:20010836; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.496
17. B.Tolhuis, M.Blom, R.M.Kerkhoven, L.Pagie, H.Teunissen, M.Nieuwland, M.Simonis, W.de Laat, M.van Lohuizen, B.van Steensel. Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001343; PMID:21455484; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001343
18. F.Bantignies, V.Roure, I.Comet, B.Leblanc, B.Schuettengruber, J.Bonnet, V.Tixier, A.Mas, G.Cavalli. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 2011; 144:214-26; PMID:21241892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026
19. M.Thompson, R.A.Haeusler, P.D.Good, D.R.Engelke. Nucleolar clustering of dispersed tRNA genes. Science 2003; 302:1399-401; PMID:14631041; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1089814
20. O.M.Aparicio, B.L.Billington, D.E.Gottschling. Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1991; 66:1279-87; PMID:1913809; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90049-5
21. D.G.Brickner, S.Ahmed, L.Meldi, A.Thompson, W.Light, M.Young, T.L.Hickman, F.Chu, E.Fabre, J.H.Brickner. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev Cell 2012; 22:1234-46; PMID:22579222; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.012
22. S.Ahmed, J.H.Brickner. Regulation and epigenetic control of transcription at the nuclear periphery. Trends Genet 2007; 23:396-402; PMID:17566592; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.009
23. J.A.Graves, S.A.Henry. Regulation of the yeast INO1 gene. The products of the INO2, INO4 and OPI1 regulatory genes are not required for repression in response to inositol. Genetics 2000; 154:1485-95; PMID:10747047
24. P.Pascual-Garcia, J.Jeong, M.Capelson. Nucleoporin Nup98 associates with Trx/MLL and NSL histone-modifying complexes and regulates Hox gene expression. Cell Rep 2014; 9:433-42; PMID:25310983; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.002
25. S.E.Rundlett, A.A.Carmen, N.Suka, B.M.Turner, M.Grunstein. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 1998; 392:831-5; PMID:9572144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/33952
26. W.T.Heyken, A.Repenning, J.Kumme, H.J.Schuller. Constitutive expression of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes by variants of Ino2 activator defective for interaction with Opi1 repressor. Mol Microbiol 2005; 56:696-707; PMID:15819625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04499.x
27. W.Zheng, H.Zhao, E.Mancera, L.M.Steinmetz, M.Snyder. Genetic analysis of variation in transcription factor binding in yeast. Nature 2010; 464:1187-91; PMID:20237471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08934
28. K.Tedford, S.Kim, D.Sa, K.Stevens, M.Tyers. Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates. Curr Biol 1997; 7:228-38; PMID:9094309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00118-7
29. K.A.Olson, C.Nelson, G.Tai, W.Hung, C.Yong, C.Astell, I.Sadowski. Two regulators of Ste12p inhibit pheromone-responsive transcription by separate mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4199-209; PMID:10825185; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.12.4199-4209.2000
30. A.G.Hinnebusch. Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 2005; 59:407-50; PMID:16153175; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833
31. R.Luthra, S.C.Kerr, M.T.Harreman, L.H.Apponi, M.B.Fasken, S.Ramineni, S.Chaurasia, S.R.Valentini, A.H.Corbett. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:3042-9; PMID:17158105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608741200
32. A.Akhtar, S.M.Gasser. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:507-17; PMID:17549064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2122
33. S.P.Baker, P.A.Grant. The SAGA continues:expanding the cellular role of a transcriptional co-activator complex. Oncogene 2007; 26:5329-40; PMID:17694076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210603