Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of tolerance to drought in Pisum sativum

Proteomics

Volumn 16, Issue 21, 2016, Pages 2776-2787

  Castillejo, María Ángeles ^a,b   Iglesias García, Rebeca ^b   Wienkoop, Stefanie ^a   Rubiales, Diego ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b INSTITUTO DE AGRICULTURA SOSTENIBLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Drought stress tolerance; Pisum sativum; Plant Proteomics; Shotgun proteomics

Indexed keywords

ABIOTIC STRESS; ACCLIMATIZATION; ARTICLE; CROP; DROUGHT STRESS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENOTYPE; HOMEOSTASIS; PEA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOIL WATER CONTENT; WATER CONTENT; WATER DEFICIT; WATER STRESS; BIOSYNTHESIS; DROUGHT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT ROOT;

PLANT PROTEIN;

DROUGHTS; PEAS; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; PROTEOMICS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84987909816     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201600156     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Smýkal, P., Aubert, G., Burstin, J., Coyne, C. J. et al., Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Genomic Era. Agronomy 2012, 2, 74–115.
2. Moneim, A., Cocks, P. S., Mawlawy, B., Genotype-environment interactions and stability analysis for herbage and seed yields of forage peas under rain-fed conditions. Plant Breeding 1990, 104, 231–240.
3. Morison, J. I., Baker, N. R., Mullineaux, P. M., Davies, W. J., Improving water use in crop production. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 639–658.
4. Xin, Z., Wang, M. L., Barkley, N. A., Burow, G. et al., Applying genotyping (TILLING) and phenotyping analyses to elucidate gene function in a chemically induced sorghum mutant population. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 103.
5. Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.-W., Mazzucotelli, E. et al., Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops. Res. 2008, 105, 1–14.
6. Itoh, R., Kumura, A., Acclimation of soybean plantsto water deficit. I. Effects of prolonged water deficit on the production and partition of dry matter. Japanese J. Crop. Sci. 1986, 55, 367–373.
7. Ali, M., Jensen, C. R., Mogensen, V. O., Andersen, M. N. et al., Root signalling and osmotic adjustment during intermittent soil drying sustain grain yield of field grown wheat. Field Crops. Res. 1999, 62, 35–52.
8. Hernández, J. A., Jiménez, A., Mullineaux, P., Sevilla, F., Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum) long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defences. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 853–862.
9. Alexieva, V., Sergiev, I., Mapelli, S., Karanov, E., The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 1337–1344.
10. Hernandez, J. A., Almansa, M. S., Short-term effects of salt stress on antioxidant systems and leaf water relations of pea leaves. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 115, 251–257.
11. Asada, K., The water-water cycle as alternative photon and electron sinks. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 2000, 355, 1419–1430.
12. Grzesiak, S., Iijima, M., Kono, Y., Yamauchi, A., Differences in drought tolerance between cultivars of field bean and field pea. Morphological characteristics, germination and seedling growth. Acta Physiol. Plant. 1997, 19, 339–348.
13. Sanchez, F. J., Manzanares, M., de Andres, E. F., Tenorio, J. L. et al., Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crops. Res. 1998, 59, 225–235.
14. Baigorri, H., Antolin, M. C., Sánchez-Díaz, M., Reproductive response of two morphologically different pea cultivars to drought. Eur. J. Agron. 1999, 10, 119–128.
15. Karataş, I., Öztürk, L., Demir, Y., Unlükara, A. et al., Alterations in antioxidant enzyme activities and proline content in pea leaves under long-term drought stress. Toxicol. Ind. Health. 2014, 30, 693–700.
16. Taylor, N. L., Heazlewood, J. L., Day, D. A., Millar, A. H., Differential impact of environmental stresses on the pea mitochondrial proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1122–1133.
17. Taylor, N. L., Rudhe, C., Hulett, J. M., Lithgow, T. et al., Environmental stresses inhibit and stimulate different protein import pathways in plant mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 2003, 547, 125–130.
18. Irar, S., González, E. M., Arrese-Igor, C., Marino, D., A proteomic approach reveals new actors of nodule response to drought in split-root grown pea plants. Physiol. Plantarum. 2014, 152, 634–645.
19. Iglesias-García, R., Department of Genetics, University of Córdoba, Spain 2012, p. 205.
20. Iglesias-García, R., Prats, E., Fondevilla, S., Satovic, Z. et al., Quantitative trait loci associated to drought adaptation in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1768–1778.
21. Larrainzar, E., Wienkoop, S., Scherling, C., Kempa, S. et al., Carbon metabolism and bacteroid functioning are involved in the regulation of nitrogen fixation in Medicago truncatula under drought and recovery. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2009, 22, 1565–1576.
22. Evans, H. J., Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legume nodules, in: Moore, T. C (Ed.), Research Experiences in Plant Physiology, Springer-Verlag, NewYork 1981, pp. 294–310.
23. Bechtold, U., Lawson, T., Mejia-Carranza, J., Meyer, R. C. et al., Constitutive salicylic acid defences do not compromise seed yield, drought tolerance and water productivity in the Arabidopsis accession C24. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1959–1973.
24. Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Molero, G., Bort, J., Nogués, S. et al., The combined effect of constant water deficit and nitrogen supply on WUE, NUE and Δ13C in durum wheat potted plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 151, 277–289.
25. Wienkoop, S., Proteomics and metabolomics for systems biology in legumes, in: Perez de la Vega, M., Torres, A. M., Cubero, J. I., Kole, C. (Eds.), Cool Season Grain Legumes, Science Publishers, New Hampshire 2011, pp. 303–314.
26. Hoehenwarter, W., Wienkoop, S., Spectral counting robust on high mass accuracy mass spectrometers. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2010, 24, 3609–3614.
27. Old, W. M., Meyer-Arendt, K., Aveline-Wolf, L., Pierce, K. G. et al., Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4.10, 1487–1502.
28. Wienkoop, S., Larrainzar, E., Niemann, M., González, E. M. et al., Stable isotope-free quantitative shotgun proteomics combined with sample pattern recognition for rapid diagnostics. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29, 2793–2801.
29. Larrainzar, E., Wienkoop, S., Weckwerth, W., Ladrera, R. et al., Medicago truncatula root nodule proteome analysis reveals differential plant and bacteroid responses to drought stress. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1495–1507.
30. Vizcaíno, J. A., Csordas, A., del-Toro, N., Dianes, J. A. et al., 2016 update of the PRIDE database and related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44 (D1), D447–D456 (PubMed ID: 26527722).
31. Castillejo, M. A., Staudinger, C., Egelhofer, V., Wienkoop, S., Medicago truncatula proteomics for systems biology: novel rapid shotgun LC-MS approach for relative quantification based on full-scan selective peptide extraction (Selpex). Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1072, 303–313.
32. Zybailov, B., Mosley, A. L., Sardiu, M. E., Coleman, M. K. et al., Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2339–2347.
33. Pinheiro, C., Chaves, M. M., Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 869–882.
34. Chaves, M. M., Pereira, J. S., Maroco, J., Rodrigues, M. L. et al., How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89, 907–916.
35. Cheng, Z., Dong, K., Ge, P., Bian, Y. et al., Identification of leaf proteins differentially accumulated between wheat cultivars distinct in their levels of drought tolerance. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0125302, 1–20.
36. Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B., Brosche, M., Renaut, J., Jouve, L. et al., Gradual soil water depletion results in reversible changes of gene expression, protein profiles, ecophysiology, and growth performance in Populus euphratica, a poplar growing in arid regions. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 876–892.
37. Ingle, R., Schmidt, U. G., Farrant, J. M., Thomson, J. A. et al., Proteomic analysis of leaf proteins during dehydration of the resurrection plant Xerophyta viscosa. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 435–446.
38. Hieng, B., Ugrinovic, K., Sustar-Vozlic, J., Kidric, M., Different classes of proteases are involved in the response to drought of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivars differing in sensitivity. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 519–530.
39. 2 pollution on spruce endoproteases. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1990, 28, 95–104.
40. Roy-Macauley, H., Zuily-Fodil, Y., Kidrič, M., Pham Thi. et al., Effect of drought stress on proteolytic activities in Phaseolus and Vigna leaves from sensitive and resistant plants. Physiol. Plantarum. 1992, 85, 90–96.
41. Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Planchon, S., Renaut, J. et al., Proteome analysis of cold response in spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) crowns reveals similarities in stress adaptation and differences in regulatory processes between the growth habits. J. Proteome. Res. 2013, 12, 4830–4845.
42. Ge, P., Ma, C., Wang, S., Gao, L. et al., Comparative proteomic analysis of grain development in two spring wheat varieties under drought stress. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402, 1297–1313.
43. Zhang, M., Lv, D., Ge, P., Bian, Y. et al., Phosphoproteome analysis reveals new drought response and defense mechanisms of seedling leaves in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Proteomics 2014, 109, 290–308.
44. Foyer, C. H., Noctor, G., Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 17, 1866–1875.
45. Himmelbach, A., Yang, Y., Grill, E., Relay and control of abscisic acid signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 470–479.
46. Zhang, L., Zhao, H. K., Dong, Q. L., Zhang, Y. Y. et al., Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling under heat and drought treatments of HSP70 gene family in soybean (Glycine max L.). Front Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 773.
47. Christmann, A., Moes, D., Himmelbach, A., Yang, Y. et al., Integration of abscisic acid signalling into plant responses. Plant Biol. 2006, 8, 314–325.
48. Bian, S., Jiang, Y., Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam 2009, 120, 264–270.
49. Hassan, N. M., El-Bastawisy, Z. M., El-Sayed, A. K., Ebeed, H. T. et al., Roles of dehydrin genes in wheat tolerance to drought stress. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 179–188.
50. International Barley Genome Sequencing, C., Mayer, K. F., Waugh, R., Brown, J. W. et al., A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 2012, 491, 711–716.
51. Bray, E., Genes commonly regulated by water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 2331–2341.
52. Yan, J., He, C., Wang, J., Mao, Z. et al., Overexpression of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 protein GF14λ in cotton leads to a “stay-green” phenotype and improves stress tolerance under moderate drought conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 1007–1014.
53. Palmieri, F., Pierri, C. L., De Grassi, A., Nunes-Nesi, A. et al., Evolution, structure and function of mitochondrial carriers: a review with new insights. Plant. J. 2011, 66, 161–181.
54. Homblé, F., Krammer, E. M., Prevost, M., Plant VDAC: facts and speculations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012, 1818, 1486–1501.
55. Desai, M. K., Mishra, R. N., Verma, D., Nair, S. et al., Structural and functional analysis of a salt stress inducible gene encoding voltage dependent anion channel (VDAC) from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 483–493.
56. Al Bitar, F., Roosens, N., Smeyers, M., Vauterin, M. et al., Sequence analysis, transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of the rice vdac family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Struct. Expression 2003, 1625, 43–51.
57. Kluge, C., Lamkemeyer, P., Tavakoli, N., Golldack, D. et al., cDNA cloning of 12 subunits of the V-type ATPase from Mesembryanthemum crystallinum and their expression under stress. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2003, 20, 171–183.
58. Golldack, D., Dietz, K. J., Salt-induced expression of the vacuolar H+-ATPase in the common ice plant is developmentally controlled and tissue specific. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 1643–1654.
59. Majoul, T., Bancel, E., Triboï, E., Ben Hamida, J. et al., Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: characterization of heat-responsive proteins from non-prolamins fraction. Proteomics 2004, 4, 505–513.
60. Li, J., Ban, L., Wen, H., Wang, Z. et al., An aquaporin protein is associated with drought stress tolerance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 459, 208–213.
61. Pelloux, J., Rusterucci, C., Mellerowicz, E. J., New insights into pectin methylesterase structure and function. Trends. Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 267–277.
62. Marty, P., Jouan, B., Bertheau, Y., Vian, B., Goldberg, R., Charge density in stem cell walls of Solanum tuberosum genotypes and susceptibility to blackleg. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 1435–1441.
63. Schmohl, N., Pilling, J., Fisahn, J., Horst, W. J., Pectin methylesterase modulates aluminium sensitivity in Zea mays and Solanum tuberosum. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 109, 419–427.
64. Dorokhov, Y. L., Frolova, O. Y., Skurat, E. V., Ivanov, P. A. et al., A novel function for a ubiquitous plant enzyme pectin methylesterase: the enhancer of RNA silencing. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 3872–3878.
65. von Dahl, C. C., Havecker, M., Schlogl, R., Baldwin, I. T., Caterpillar-elicited methanol emission: a new signal in plant-herbivore interactions? Plant. J. 2006, 46, 948–960.
66. Hourton-Cabassa, C., Ambard-Bretteville, F., Moreau, F., de Virville, J. D. et al., Stress induction of mitochondrial formate dehydrogenase in potato leaves. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 627–635.