Virtual Body Swap: A New Feasible Tool to Be Explored in Health and Education

Proceedings - 18th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, SVR 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 81-89

  De Oliveira, Elen Collaco ^a   Bertrand, Philippe ^b   Lesur, Marte Ernesto Roel ^c   Palomo, Priscila ^d   Demarzo, Marcelo ^e   Cebolla, Ausias ^f   Banos, Rosa ^d   Tori, Romero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b BeAnotherLab   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA   (Mexico)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

body agency; Body swap illusion; embodiment system; presence; virtual environment; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; BUDGET CONTROL; E-LEARNING; SURVEYS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BODY AGENCY; BODY SWAP ILLUSION; EMBODIMENT SYSTEM; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYS; IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; PRESENCE; VIRTUAL BODIES;

HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS;

EID: 84986222491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SVR.2016.23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. I. E. Sutherland, "The ultimate display," Multimedia: From Wagner to virtual reality, 1965.
2. P. Milgram, H. Takemura, A. Utsumi, and F. Kishino, "Augmented reality: A class of displays on the realityvirtuality continuum," in Photonics for industrial applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1995, pp. 282-292.
3. S. Gallagher, "Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science," Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14-21, 2000.
4. H. H. Ehrsson, K. Wiech, N. Weiskopf, R. J. Dolan, and R. E. Passingham, "Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 23, pp. 9828-9833, 2007.
5. B. Lenggenhager, T. Tadi, T. Metzinger, and O. Blanke, "Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness," Science, vol. 317, no. 5841, pp. 1096-1099, 2007.
6. A. Maselli and M. Slater, "The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion," Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 83, 2013.
7. M. Slater and M. Usoh, "Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments," Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221-233, 1993.
8. H. H. Ehrsson, N. P. Holmes, and R. E. Passingham, "Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas," The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 45, pp. 10 564-10 573, 2005.
9. V. I. Petkova and H. H. Ehrsson, "If i were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping," PloS one, vol. 3, no. 12, p. e3832, 2008.
10. B. van der Hoort, A. Guterstam, and H. H. Ehrsson, "Being barbie: the size of ones own body determines the perceived size of the world," PloS one, vol. 6, no. 5, p. e20195, 2011.
11. B. Spanlang, J.-M. Normand, D. Borland, K. Kilteni, E. Giannopoulos, A. Pomés, M. González-Franco, D. Pérez Marcos, J. Arroyo-Palacios, X. Muncunill et al., "How to build an embodiment lab: achieving body representation illusions in virtual reality," Front. Robot. AI, vol. 1, no. 9, 2014.
12. L. Maister, M. Slater, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and M. Tsakiris, "Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition," Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 6-12, 2015.
13. J. Limanowski, "What can body ownership illusions tell us about minimal phenomenal selfhood?" Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 8, 2014.
14. K. Kilteni, A. Maselli, K. P. Kording, and M. Slater, "Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception," Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 9, 2015.
15. G. Mantovani and G. Riva, "real presence: how different ontologies generate different criteria for presence, telepresence, and virtual presence," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 540-550, 1999.
16. A. Guterstam, Z. Abdulkarim, and H. H. Ehrsson, "Illusory ownership of an invisible body reduces autonomic and subjective social anxiety responses," Scientific reports, vol. 5, 2015.
17. P. Bertrand, D. Franco, A. Pointeau, and C. Cherene, "The machine to be another - embodied telepresence using human performers," in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, 2014.
18. M. Slater, "Measuring presence: A response to the witmer and singer presence questionnaire," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 560-565, 1999.
19. M. Lombard, T. Ditton, and L. Weinstein, "Measuring presence: the temple presence inventory," in Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence, 2009, pp. 1-15.
20. M. V. Sanchez-Vives and M. Slater, "From presence to consciousness through virtual reality," Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 332-339, 2005.
21. M. Mori, K. F. MacDorman, and N. Kageki, "The uncanny valley [from the field]," Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 98-100, 2012.
22. M. Slater, M. Usoh, and A. Steed, "Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 201-219, 1995.
23. T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht, "The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights," Presence, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 266-281, 2001.
24. M. Meehan, B. Insko, M. Whitton, and F. P. Brooks Jr, "Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments," in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 21, no. 3. ACM, 2002, pp. 645-652.
25. D.-P. Pertaub, M. Slater, and C. Barker, "An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience," Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 68-78, 2002.
26. A. Felnhofer, O. D. Kothgassner, N. Hauk, L. Beutl, H. Hlavacs, and I. Kryspin-Exner, "Physical and social presence in collaborative virtual environments: Exploring age and gender differences with respect to empathy," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 31, pp. 272-279, 2014.
27. M. Kammers, F. de Vignemont, L. Verhagen, and H. C. Dijkerman, "The rubber hand illusion in action," Neuropsychologia, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 204-211, 2009.
28. M. R. Longo, F. Schüür, M. P. Kammers, M. Tsakiris, and P. Haggard, "What is embodiment? a psychometric approach," Cognition, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 978-998, 2008.
29. M. Tsakiris, L. Carpenter, D. James, and A. Fotopoulou, "Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 343-352, 2010.
30. K. Ma and B. Hommel, "The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion," Consciousness and cognition, vol. 36, pp. 277-288, 2015.
31. M. Slater, B. Spanlang, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and O. Blanke, "First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality," PloS one, vol. 5, no. 5, p. e10564, 2010.
32. A. Tajadura-Jiménez, M. R. Longo, R. Coleman, and M. Tsakiris, "The person in the mirror: using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of selfidentification," Consciousness and cognition, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1725-1738, 2012.
33. L. Maister, E. Tsiakkas, and M. Tsakiris, "I feel your fear: Shared touch between faces facilitates recognition of fearful facial expressions." Emotion, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 7, 2013.
34. A. Sforza, I. Bufalari, P. Haggard, and S. M. Aglioti, "My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity," Social neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 148-162, 2010.