The person in the mirror: Using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1725-1738

  Tajadura Jiménez, Ana ^a   Longo, Matthew R ^b   Coleman, Rosie ^a   Tsakiris, Manos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Enfacement illusion; Mirror recognition; Multisensory integration; Self face representation; Self identity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EXPERIENCE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BODY IMAGE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84869835283     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bertenthal B.I., Fischer K.W. Development of self-recognition in the infant. Child Development 1978, 14:44-50.
2. Bishara S.E. Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications. Angle Orthodontist 2000, 70:471-483.
3. Blanke O., Metzinger T. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Science 2009, 13:7-13.
4. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
5. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models 1993, 136-162. Sage, Newsbury Park, CA. K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.).
6. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming 2010, Taylor and Francis, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
7. de Waal F.B., Dindo M., Freeman C.A., Hall M.J. The monkey in the mirror: Hardly a stranger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2005, 102:11140-11147.
8. Devue C., Brédart S. The neural correlates of visual self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:40-51.
9. Ehrsson H.H. The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 2007, 317:1048.
10. Farkas L.G., Eiben O.G., Sivkov S., Tompson B., Katic M.J., Forrest C.R. Anthropometric measurements of the facial framework in adulthood: Age-related changes in eight age categories in 600 healthy white North Americans of European ancestry from 16 to 90 years of age. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2004, 15:288-298.
11. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2011, SAGE, London, England. 3rd ed.
12. Gallup G.G.J. Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science 1970, 167:86-87.
13. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate data analysis 2006, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 6th ed.
14. Kammers M.P., Rose K., Haggard P. Feeling numb: Temperature, but not thermal pain, modulates feeling of body ownership. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1316-1321.
15. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 1998, Guilford Press, NY.
16. Legrand D. Subjective and physical dimensions of bodily self-consciousness, and their dis-integration in anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:726-737.
17. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 2007, 317:1096-1099.
18. Lewis M., Brooks-Gunn H. Social cognition and the acquisition of self 1979, Plenum Press, New York.
19. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008, 107:978-998.
20. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P.M., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:166-172.
21. Moseley G.L., Olthof N., Venema A., Don S., Wijers M., Gallace A., et al. Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2008, 105:13168-13172.
22. Page R.A., Green J.P. An update on age, hypnotic suggestibility, and gender: A brief report. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 2007, 49:283-287.
23. Paladino M.-P., Mazzurega M., Pavani F., Schubert T.W. Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1202-1207.
24. Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. If I Were You: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3832.
25. Povinelli D.J., Simon B.B. Young children's reactions to briefly versus extremely delayed images of the self: Emergence of the autobiographical stance. Developmental Psychology 1998, 43:188-194.
26. Schandry R. Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:483-488.
27. Sforza A., Bufalari I., Haggard P., Aglioti S.M. My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Social Neuroscience 2010, 5:148-162.
28. Tajadura-Jiménez A., Grehl S., Tsakiris M. The other in me: Interpersonal multisensory stimulation changes the mental representation of the self. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e40682.
29. Tsakiris M. Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PLoS One 2008, 3:e4040.
30. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:703-712.
31. Tsakiris M., Tajadura-Jiménez A., Costantini M. Just a heartbeat away from one's body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278:2470-2476.
32. Ullman J.B. Structural equation modeling. Using multivariate statistics 2001, 653-771. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA. 4th ed. B.G. Tabachnick, L.S. Fidell (Eds.).
33. Zahavi D., Roepstorff A. Faces and ascriptions: Mapping measures of the self. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:141-148.