Exploring the future use of forests: perceptions from non-industrial private forest owners in Finland

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 327-337

  Häyrinen, Liina ^a   Mattila, Osmo ^a   Berghäll, Sami ^a   Närhi, Markus ^b   Toppinen, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b Paperinkeräys Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

customer involvement; forest bioeconomy; Future use of forests; non industrial private forest owners

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS;

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS; CUSTOMER INVOLVEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOREST BIOECONOMY; FUTURE USE OF FORESTS; NATURE-BASED TOURISM; NON-INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE FOREST OWNERS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84986189936     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1227472     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alam I, Perry A. 2002. A customer-oriented new service development process. J Ser Mark. 16:515–534. doi:10.1108/08876040210443391
2. Bonan GB. 2008. Forests and climate change:forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 320:1444–1449. doi:10.1126/science.1155121
3. Butler BJ, Tyrrell M, Feinberg G, VanManen S, Wiseman L, Wallinger S. 2007. Understanding and reaching family forest owners:lessons from social marketing research. J For. 105:348–357.
4. Delgado M, Porter ME, Stern S. 2010. Clusters and entrepreneurship. J Econ Geogr. 10:495–518. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq010
5. Edvardsson B, Kristensson P, Magnusson P, Sundström E. 2012. Customer integration within service development–a review of methods and an analysis of insitu and exsitu contributions. Technovation. 32:419–429. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.04.006
6. Elo S, Kyngäs H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 62:107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
7. European Commission. 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth:a bioeconomy for Europe. Directorate-general for research and innovation. Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union.
8. FAO. 2014. Forests and sustainable development goals. Twenty-second session of Committee on forestry. Rome, Italy.
9. Forest Sector Technology Platform. 2015. [cited 2015 Oct 28]. Available from:http://www.forestplatform.org/.
10. Hamunen K, Virkkula O, Hujala T, Hiedanpää J, Kurttila M. 2015. Enhancing informal interaction and knowledge co-construction among forest owners. Silva Fennica. 49(1):15p. doi:10.14214/sf.1214.
11. Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2014. Changing objectives of non-industrial private forest ownership:a confirmatory approach to measurement model testing. Can J For Res. 44:290–300. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0211
12. Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2015. Forest owners’ socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of customer value:evidence from Finland. Small Scale For. 14:19–37. doi:10.1007/s11842-014-9271-9
13. Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2016. Lifestyle of health and sustainability of forest owners as an indicator of multiple use of forests. For Policy Econ. 67:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.005
14. Hetemäki L, Hänninen R, Moiseyev A. 2013. Markets and market forces for pulp and paper products. In:Hansen E, Vlosky R, Panwar R, editors. Global forest products:changes, practices, and prospects. Boca Raton, FL:Taylor & Francis; p. 99–127.
15. Hetemäki L, Niinistö S, Seppälä R, Uusivuori J. 2011. Murroksen jälkeen–Metsien käytön tulevaisuus Suomessa [After the transition–the future of forest use in Finland]. Metsäkustannus, Hämeenlinna 140. Finnish.
16. Hirsch F, Korotkov A, Wilnhammer M. 2007. Private forest ownership in Europe. Unasylva. 58:23–25.
17. Hovgaard A, Hansen E. 2004. Innovativeness in the forest products industry. For Prod J. 54(1):26–33.
18. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15:1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
19. Hujala T, Karppinen H, Kurttila M. 2013. Customer segments among family forest owners:combining ownership objectives and decision-making styles. Small Scale For. 12:335–351. doi:10.1007/s11842-012-9215-1
20. Hull RB, Nelson K. 2011. Wildland–urban interface forest entrepreneurs:a look at a new trend. J For. 109:136–140.
21. Hull RB, Robertson DP, Buhyoff GJ. 2004. “Boutique” forestry–new forest practices in urbanizing landscapes. J For. 102:14–19.
22. Karppinen H, Berghäll S. 2015. Forest owners’ stand improvement decisions:applying the theory of planned behavior. For Policy Econ. 50:275–284. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.009
23. Kitzinger J. 1995. Qualitative research:introducing focus groups. BMJ. 311:299–302. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
24. Kleinschmit D, Lindstad B, Jellesmark Thorsen B, Toppinen A, Roos A, Baardsen S. 2014. Shades of green:social science view on forest sector in bioeconomy. Scand J For Res. 29:402–410. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.921722
25. Kline JD, Alig RJ, Johnson RL. 2000. Fostering the production of nontimber services amongst forest owners with heterogeneous objectives. For Sci. 46:302–311.
26. Kuipers B, Shivan G, Potter-Witter K. 2013. Identifying appropriate communication means for reaching nonindustrial private forest landowners. J For. 111:34–41.
27. Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For Sci. 42:300–309.
28. Lidestav G, Lejon SB. 2013. Harvesting and silvicultural activities in Swedish family forestry–behavior changes from a gender perspective. Scand J For Res. 28:136–142. doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.701324
29. Lindahl KB, Westholm E. 2012. Future forests:perceptions and strategies of key actors. Scand J For Res. 27:154–163. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.635073
30. Lundkvist A, Yakhlef A. 2004. Customer involvement in new service development:a conversational approach. Manag Serv Qual. 14:249–257. doi:10.1108/09604520410528662
31. Lunnan A, Nybak E, Vennesland B. 2006. Entrepreneurial attitudes and probability for start-ups–an investigation of Norwegian non-industrial private forest owners. For Policy Econ. 8:683–690. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.016
32. Matilainen A, Lähdesmäki M. 2014. Nature-based tourism in private forests:stakeholder management balancing the interests of entrepreneurs and forest owners? J Rural Stud. 35:70–79. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.007
33. Matthies B, D’Amato D, Berghäll S, Ekholm T, Hoen H, Holopainen J, Korhonen J, Lähtinen K, Mattila O, Toppinen A, et al. 2016. An ecosystem service-dominant logic? Integrating the ecosystem service approach within service science. J Clean Prod. 124:51–64.
34. Matthing J, Sanden B, Edvardsson B. 2004. New service development:learning from and with customers. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 15:479–498. doi:10.1108/09564230410564948
35. Mattila O. 2015. Towards service-dominant thinking in the Finnish forestry service market. Dissertationes Forestales. 198.
36. Mattila O, Häyrinen L, Tervo M, Toppinen A, Berghäll S. 2015. Challenges of municipal greening and multifunctional forest management:the case of Finland. Urban For Urban Gree. 14:982–990. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.007
37. Mattila O, Roos A. 2014. Service logics of providers in the forestry services sector:evidence from Finland and Sweden. Econ. 54:18–25. Forest Policy Econ. 43:10–17.
38. Mattila O, Toppinen A, Tervo M, Berghäll S. 2013. Non-industrial private forestry service markets in a flux:results from a qualitative analysis on Finland. Small Scale For. 12:559–578. doi:10.1007/s11842-012-9231-1
39. McCormick K, Kautto N. 2013. The bioeconomy in Europe:an overview. Sustainability. 5:2589–2608. doi:10.3390/su5062589
40. Morgan DL. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
41. Näyhä A, Hetemäki L, Stern T. 2014. New products outlook. In:Hetemäki L, editor. Future of the European forest-based sector:structural changes towards bioeconomy. Joensuu:European Forest Institute; p. 43–54.
42. Näyhä A, Pelli P, Hetemäki L. 2015. Services in the forest-based sector–unexplored futures. Foresight. 17:378–398. doi:10.1108/FS-08-2013-0034
43. Nordlund A, Westin K. 2011. Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests. 2:30–50. doi:10.3390/f2010030
44. Nybakk E, Crespell P, Hansen E, Lunnan A. 2009. Antecedents to forest owner innovativeness:an investigation of the non-timber forest products and services sector. For Ecol Manage. 257:608–618. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.040
45. OECD. 2005. Enhancing the performance of the services sector. Paris:OECD.
46. Parker A, Tritter J. 2006. Focus group method and methodology:current practice and recent debate. Int J Res Meth Educ. 29:23–37. doi:10.1080/01406720500537304
47. Pätäri S, Tuppura A, Toppinen A, Korhonen J. 2016. Global sustainability megaforces in shaping the future of the European pulp and paper industry towards a bioeconomy. For Policy Econ. 66:38–46. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.009
48. Peltola T. 2007. Metsäalan arvoketjujen elinkeinomahdollisuudet [The business prospects of the forestry value chains]. Joensuun yliopisto, Metsäalan tulevaisuusfoorumi 2007. Finnish.
49. Penttinen R. 1994. Summary of the critique on Porter’s Diamond model. Porter’s Diamond model modified to suit the Finnish Paper and Board Machine Industry. Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos. Discussion Papers 462, Helsinki.
50. Pfau S, Hagens J, Dankbaar B, Smits A. 2014. Review:visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability. 6:1222–1249. doi:10.3390/su6031222
51. Porter ME. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York:Free Press.
52. Porter ME. 1998. Clusters and competition:new agendas for companies, governments, and institutions. In:Porter ME, editor. On competition. Boston:Harvard Business School Press; p. 197–288.
53. Pülzl H, Kleinschmit D, Arts B. 2014. Bioeconomy–an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses? Scand J For Res. 29:386–393. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.920044
54. Rämö AK, Järvinen E, Latvala T, Toivonen R, Silvennoinen H. 2009. Interest in energy crop production among Finnish non-industrial private forest owners. Biomass Bioenerg. 33:1251–1257.
55. Rickenbach M, Zeuli K, Sturgess-Cleek E. 2005. Despite failure:the emergence of “new” forest owners in private forest policy in Wisconsin, USA. Scand J For Res. 20:503–513. doi:10.1080/02827580500434806
56. Schmid O, Padel S, Levidow L. 2012. The bioeconomy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-based Appl Econ. 1:47–63.
57. Sievänen T. 2005. Luontomatkailun tulevaisuudennäkymiä ja kehittämisehdotuksia [Future prospects and development proposals for nature-based tourism] In:Koivula E, Saastamoinen O, editors. Näkökulmia luontomatkailuun ja sen tulevaisuuteen, 165. Joensuu:Joensuun yliopisto, Metsätieteellisen tiedekunnan tiedonantoja. Finnish.
58. Staffas L, Gustavsson M, McCormick K. 2013. Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy:an analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability. 5:2751–2769. doi:10.3390/su5062751
59. Statistics Finland. 2015. Standard industrial classification TOL 2008. [cited 2015 Jun 22]. Available from:http://www.stat.fi/meta/luokitukset/toimiala/001–2008/index_en.html.
60. Streck C, O’Sullivan R, Janson-Smith T, Tarasofsky R. 2008. Climate change and forestry:an introduction. In:Streck C, O’Sullivan R, Janson-Smith T, Tarasofsky R, editors. Climate change and forests:emerging policy and market opportunities. London:Clatham House; p. 3–10.
61. Umaerus P, Lidestav G, Eriksson LO, Högvall Nordin M. 2013. Gendered business activities in family farm forestry:from round wood delivery to health service. Scand J For Res. 28:596–607. doi:10.1080/02827581.2013.793385
62. Ungerböck E, Sekot W, Toscani P. 2015. Looking beyond timber:empirical evidence for the diversification of forest enterprises and the profitability of auxiliary activities in Austria. For Policy Econ. 54:18–25. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.013
63. Vainio A, Paloniemi R. 2013. Adapting to the gender order:voluntary conservation by forest owners in Finland. Land Use Policy. 35:247–256. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.017
64. Vargo SL, Lusch RF. 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark. 68:1–17. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
65. Vargo S, L, Lusch RF. 2008. Service-dominant logic:continuing the evolution. J Acad Market Sci. 36:1–10.
66. Vargo S, L, Lusch RF. 2016. Institutions and axioms:an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J Acad Mark Sci. 44:5–23.
67. Weber R. 1990. Basic content analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
68. Weiss G, Martin S, Matilainen A, Vennesland B, Nastase C, Nybakk E, Bouriaud L. 2007. Innovation processes in forest-related recreation services:the role of public and private resources in different institutional backgrounds. Small Scale For. 6:423–442. doi:10.1007/s11842-007-9034-y