"Boutique" forestry: New forest practices in urbanizing landscapes

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 14-19

  Hull, R Bruce ^a   Robertson, David P ^a   Buhyoff, Gregory J ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonindustrial private forestland; Private forest landowners

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

FORESTRY PROFESSIONALS;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; LANDOWNER; URBANIZATION;

EID: 1642480253     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BEST, C., and L.A. WAYBURN. 2001. America's private forests: Status and stewardship. Washington, DC: Island Press.
2. BIRCH, T.W. 1997. Private forest landowners of the Southern United States, 1994. Resource Bulletin NE-138. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service.
3. CAMPBELL, S.M., and D.B. KITTREDGE. 1996. Ecosystem-based management on multiple NIPE ownerships. Journal of Forestry 94(2):24-29.
4. DECOSTER, L. 1998. The boom in forest owners-A bust for forestry? Journal of Forestry 96(5):25-28.
5. DECOSTER, L. 2000. Summary of proceedings: Nibbled to death by DUCs. In Forest Fragmentation 2000: Sustaining Private Forests in the 21st Century, ed. L. Decoster, 2-12. Alexandria, VA: Sampson Group, Inc.
6. EGAN, A.F. 2002. Uniting an independent and isolated workforce: The logger association phenomena in the United States. Society and Natural Resources 15:541-52.
7. EGAN, A.F., and A.E. LULOFF. 2000. The exurbanization of America's forests. Journal of Forestry 98(3):26-30.
8. ERICKSON, D.L., R.L. RYAN, and R. DE YOUNG. 2001. Woodlots in the rural landscape: Landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study. Landscape and Urban Planning 860:1-12.
9. HODGE, S.S. 1993. Beliefs, attitudes, demographics and knowledge: The social dimensions of harvesting decisions made by private forest-land owners in Virginia. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University.
10. JACOBS, J. 1997. New pioneers: The back-to-the-land movement and the search for a sustainable future. University Park: Penn State Press.
11. LANE, C. 2001. Harvesting the suburbs: Scofield Timber Co. brings the forest back to the city. Timber Harvesting, www.timberharvesting.com; accessed by authors June 2002.
12. MACIE, E.A., and L.A. HERMANSEN, eds. 2002. Human influences on forest ecosystems: The southern wildland-urban interface assessment. General Technical Report SRS-55. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
13. MCCARY, J. 2002. Exemplary stewardship: Making forestry profitable on the front lines of the "urban interface." Timber Harvesting, www.timberharvesting.com, accessed by authors June 2002.
14. NASSAUER, J.I. 1992. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology 6:239-50.
15. POTTER, J., and M. WETHERELL. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
16. SCHNEPF, C. 2000. Reconsidering approaches to owners of fragmented forests. In Fragmentation 2000: Sustaining Private Forests in the 21st Century, ed. L. DeCoster, 308-14. Alexandria, VA: Sampson Group, Inc.
17. TYSON, C.B., S.M. CAMPBELL, and E.S. GRADY. 1998. Woodscaping for small landowners in southern New England. Journal of Forestry 96(12):4-9.
18. WEAR, D.N., R. LIU, M. FOREMAN, and R.M. SHEFFIELD. 1999. The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia. Forest Ecology and Management 118:107-15.
19. WILENT, S. 2001. Here's how to write an iron-clad timber sale contract. The Forestry Source July, p. 14.