Adapting to the gender order: Voluntary conservation by forest owners in Finland

Land Use Policy

Volumn 35, Issue , 2013, Pages 247-256

  Vainio, Annukka ^a   Paloniemi, Riikka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Conservation; Discursive psychology; Forest owner; Gender; Nature; Social psychology; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GENDER ROLE; NATURE CONSERVATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OWNERSHIP; PSYCHOLOGY; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

FINLAND;

EID: 84879823781     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alston M. Women on the Land. The Hidden Heart of Rural Australia 1995, UNSW Press, Kensington, NSW.
2. Arbuckle J. Amos 18 User's Guide. AMOS Development Corporation 2009, Spring House, PA.
3. Billig M. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology 1991, Sage, London.
4. Blocker T., Eckberg D. Gender and environmentalism: results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly 1997, 78:841-858.
5. Bord R., O'Connor R. The gender gap in environmental attitudes: the case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly 1997, 78:830-840.
6. Borg R., Paloniemi R. Deliberation in cooperative networks for forest conservation. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2012, 9:1-16.
7. Brandth B., Haugen M.S. From lumberjack to business manager: masculinity in the Norwegian forestry press. Journal of Rural Studies 2000, 16:343-355.
8. Brandth B., Haugen M.S. Breaking into a masculine discourse: women and farm forestry. Sociologia Ruralis 2000, 38:427-442.
9. Brown T. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research 2006, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
10. Browne M., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models 1993, 136-162. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. K. Bollen, J. Long (Eds.).
11. Carmines E., McIver J. Analyzing models with unobserved variables. Social Measurement: Current Issues 1981, 65-115. Sage, Beverly Hills. G. Bohrnstedt, E. Borgatta (Eds.).
12. Davidson D., Freudenburg W. Gender and environmental risk concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior 1996, 28:302-329.
13. Diamantopoulos A., Schlegelmilch B., Sinkovics R., Bohlen G. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research 2003, 56:465-480.
14. Dobscha S., Ozanne J. An ecofeminist analysis of environmentally sensitive women using qualitative methodology: the emancipatory potential of an ecological life. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 2001, 20:201-214.
15. Finnish Forest Act (1093/1996).
16. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2009, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vammala, Finland. A. Peltola (Ed.).
17. Glazebrook T. Karen Warren's ecofeminism. Ethics and the Environment 2002, 7:12-26.
18. Government of Finland Government Decision in Principle on an Action Programme to Protect Biodiversity in Forests in Southern Finland, the Western Parts of the Province of Oulu and the South-Western regions of the Province of Lapland 2002.
19. Government of Finland Government Resolution on the Forest Biodiversity Programme for Southern Finland 2008-2016. 2008, (METSO-Programme).
20. Hallikainen V., Hyppönen M., Pernu L., Puoskari J. Family forest owners' opinions about forest management in Northern Finland. Silva Fennica 2010, 44:363-384.
21. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. 1999, Blackwell, Malden. R. Harré, L. Van Langenhove (Eds.).
22. Hiedanpää J. European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Karvia, SW-Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 61:113-123.
23. Jöreskog K. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika 1971, 36:409-426.
24. Hänninen H., Karppinen H., Leppänen J. Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2010. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 2011, 208.
25. Karppinen H. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 1998, 32:43-59.
26. Karppinen H. Forest values and the objectives of forest ownership 2000, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers, Helsinki, (Doctoral dissertation).
27. Karppinen H., Ahlberg M. Metsänomistajakunnan rakenne 2020: Yleiseen väestömuutokseen perustuvat ennustemallit. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 2010, 1:17-32.
28. Koskinen S., Paloniemi R. Social learning processes of environmental policy. Handbook of Environmental Policy 2010, 291-305. Nova Science Publisher, NY. J. Meijer, A. der Berg (Eds.).
29. Kumela H., Paloniemi R. Luonnonarvokauppa - vastaus luonnonsuojelun kohtaamattomuuden ongelmiin?. Alue & Ympäristö 2006, 35:25-36.
30. Kuussaari M., Heliölä J., Pöyry J., Saarinen K. Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation 2007, 11:351-366.
31. Leskinen P., Leskinen L., Tikkanen J. Assessing objectives of regional forest policy in northern Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2004, 19:180-190.
32. Liepins R. Reading agricultural power. Media as sites and processes in the construction of meaning. New Zealand Geographer 1996, 52:3-10.
33. Strategy for Renewable Natural Resources in Finland 2001, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Publications 8b/2001.
34. McGregor S. Beyond Mothering Earth: Ecological Citizenship and the Politics of Care 2006, UBC Press, Vancouver.
35. McDonald R., Marsh H. Choosing a multivariate model: noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 107:247-255.
36. Mohai P. Gender differences in the perception of most important environmental problems. Race, Gender and Class 1997, 5:153-169.
37. Nousiainen M., Pylkkänen P., Saunders F., Seppänen L., Vesala K. Are alternative food systems socially sustainable? A case study from Finland. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2009, 33:566-594.
38. Paloniemi R., Koskinen S. Ympäristövastuullinen osallistuminen oppimisprosessina. Terra 2005, 117(1):17-32.
39. Paloniemi R., Primmer E., Similä J., Furman E. Arviointi: tulokset ja tulkinta. METSO-väliarvio 2010: toimintaohjelman käynnistyminen 2008-2009 2010, 41-64. T. Koskela, K. Syrjänen, M. Loiskekoski, R. Paloniemi (Eds.).
40. Paloniemi R., Varho V. Changing ecological and cultural states and preferences of nature conservation policy: the case of nature values trade in South-Western Finland. Journal of Rural Studies 2009, 25:87-97.
41. Paloniemi R., Vainio A. Legitimacy and empowerment: combining two conceptual approaches for explaining forest owners' willingness to cooperate in nature conservation. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2011, 8:123-138.
42. Potter J., Hepburn A. Discursive constructionism. Handbook of Constructive Research 2007, 275-293. The Guilford Press, NY. J. Holstein, J. Gubrium (Eds.).
43. Primmer E., Karppinen H. Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12:136-146.
44. Pöyry J., Lindgren S., Salminen J., Kuussaari M. Restoration of butterfly and moth communities in semi-natural grasslands by cattle grazing. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:1656-1670.
45. Rantala T., Primmer E. Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland. Environmental Science and Policy 2003, 6:205-216.
46. Raykov T., Marcoulides G. A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
47. Reed M. Taking stands: a feminist perspective on other women's activism in forestry communities of northern Vancouver Island. Gender, Place and Culture 2000, 7:363-388.
48. Reed M. Marginality and gender at work in forestry communities of British Columbia. Journal of Rural Studies 2003, 19:373-389.
49. Reed M. Taking Stands: Gender and the Sustainability of Rural Communities 2003, UBC Press, Vancouver.
50. Reed M. Moral exclusion and the hardening of difference. Women's Studies International Forum 2004, 27:223-242.
51. Sabatier P. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 1998, 5:98-130.
52. Sachs C. Gendered Fields. Rural Women, Agriculture, and Environment 1996, Westview Press, Colorado.
53. Seager J. Earth Follies: Coming to Terms with the Global Environmental Crisis 1993, Routledge, NY, USA.
54. Silvasti T. Bending borders of gendered labour division on farms: the case of Finland. Sociologia Ruralis 2003, 43:54-166.
55. Tindall D., Davies S., Mauboulès S. Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: the contradictory effects of gender. Society and Natural Resources 2003, 16:909-932.
56. Uliczka H., Angelstam P., Jansson G., Bro A. Non-industrial private forest owners' knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2004, 19:274-288.
57. Vainio A., Paloniemi R. Forest owners and power: a Foucauldian study on Finnish forest policy. Forest Policy & Economics 2012, 21:118-125.
58. Varghese J., Reed M. Theorizing the implications of gender order for sustainable forest management. International Journal of Forestry Research 2012, 10.1155/2012/257280.
59. Walter G., Wilson S. Silent partners: women in farm magazine success stories, 1934-91. Rural Sociology 1996, 61:227-248.
60. Willig C. Discourse analysis. Qualitative Psychology 2003, 159-183. Sage, London. J. Smith (Ed.).
61. Wood L., Kroger R. Doing Discourse Analysis 2000, Sage, California.
62. Zelezny L., Chua P., Aldrich C. Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56:443-457.