Analytical operations relate structural and functional connectivity in the brain

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Saggio, Maria Luisa ^a,b   Ritter, Petra ^c,d,e,f   Jirsa, Viktor K ^a,b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^e BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

^f HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; NOISE; REST; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRACTOGRAPHY; WHITE MATTER; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84984868975     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157292     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Honey CJ, Kötter R, Breakspear M, Sporns O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104 (24):10240-10245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104
2. Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran JP, Meuli R, et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(6):2035-2040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106
3. Daffertshofer A, van Wijk BC. On the influence of amplitude on the connectivity between phases. Frontiers in neuroinformatics. 2011; 5. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00006
4. Rho YA, McIntosh RA, Jirsa VK. Synchrony of two brain regions predicts the blood oxygen level dependent activity of a third. Brain Connectivity. 2011; 1(1):73-80. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0009
5. Dhamala M, Jirsa VK, Ding M. Enhancement of neural synchrony by time delay. Physical Review Letters. 2004; 92(7):074104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.074104
6. Feng J, Jirsa VK, Ding M. Synchronization in networks with random interactions: Theory and applications. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 2006; 16(1):015109. doi: 10.1063/1. 2180690
7. Jirsa VK. Dispersion and time delay effects in synchronized spike-burst networks. Cognitive neurodynamics. 2008; 2(1):29-38. doi: 10.1007/s11571-007-9030-0
8. Ghosh A, Rho Y, McIntosh AR, Kötter R, Jirsa VK. Noise during rest enables the exploration of the brain's dynamic repertoire. PLoS Computational Biology. 2008; 4(10):e1000196. doi: 10.1371/journal. pcbi.1000196
9. Deco G, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011; 12(1):43-56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2961
10. Jirsa V, Sporns O, Breakspear M, Deco G, McIntosh AR. Towards the virtual brain: network modeling of the intact and the damaged brain. Archives Italiennes de Biologie. 2010; 148(3):189-205.
11. Messé A, Hött MT, König P, Hilgetag CC. A closer look at the apparent correlation of structural and functional connectivity in excitable neural networks. Scientific reports. 2015; 5. doi: 10.1038/srep07870
12. Stam C, van Straaten E, Van Dellen E, Tewarie P, Gong G, Hillebrand A, et al. The relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2015;.
13. Goñi J, van den Heuvel MP, Avena-Koenigsberger A, de Mendizabal NV, Betzel RF, Griffa A, et al. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111(2):833-838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315529111
14. Deco G, Ponce-Alvarez A, Mantini D, Romani GL, Hagmann P, Corbetta M. Resting-state functional connectivity emerges from structurally and dynamically shaped slow linear fluctuations. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013; 33(27):11239-11252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1091-13.2013
15. Hlinka J, Coombes S. Using computational models to relate structural and functional brain connectivity. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 36(2):2137-2145. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08081.x
16. Deco G, Jirsa VK. Ongoing cortical activity at rest: criticality, multistability, and ghost attractors. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 32(10):3366-3375. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-11.2012
17. Jirsa VK, Ding M. Will a large complex system with time delays be stable? Physical Review Letters. 2004; 93(7):070602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070602
18. Jirsa VK. Neural field dynamics with local and global connectivity and time delay. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2009; 367 (1891):1131-1143. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0260
19. Qubbaj MR, Jirsa VK. Neural field dynamics with heterogeneous connection topology. Physical Review Letters. 2007; 98(23):238102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.238102
20. Friston KJ. Functional and effective connectivity: A review. Brain connectivity. 2011; 1(1):13-36. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008
21. Hlinka J, Paluš M, Vejmelka M, Mantini D, Corbetta M. Functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI: is linear correlation sufficient? Neuroimage. 2011; 54(3):2218-2225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08. 042
22. Messé A, Rudrauf D, Benali H, Marrelec G. Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities. PLoS Computational Biology. 2014; 10(3):e1003530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003530
23. Chang C, Glover GH. Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI. Neuroimage. 2010; 50(1):81-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.011
24. Roy D, Sigala R, Breakspear M, McIntosh AR, Jirsa VK, Deco G, et al. Using the Virtual Brain to Reveal the Role of Oscillations and Plasticity in Shaping Brain's Dynamical Landscape. Brain Connectivity. 2014; 4(10):791-811. doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0252
25. Abdelnour F, Voss HU, Raj A. Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks. Neuroimage. 2014; 90:335-347. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2013.12.039
26. Hansen EC, Battaglia D, Spiegler A, Deco G, Jirsa VK. Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state. NeuroImage. 2015; 105:525-535. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage. 2014.11.001
27. Hindriks R, Adhikari M, Murayama Y, Ganzetti M, Mantini D, Logothetis N, et al. Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI? NeuroImage. 2015;.
28. Rosazza C, Minati L. Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications. Neurological Sciences. 2011; 32(5):773-785. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0636-y
29. McIntosh AR, Kovacevic N, Lippe S, Garrett D, Grady C, Jirsa V. The development of a noisy brain. Archives Italiennes de Biologie. 2010; 148(3):323-337.
30. Domínguez LG, Velázquez JLP, Galán RF. A model of functional brain connectivity and background noise as a biomarker for cognitive phenotypes: Application to autism. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061493
31. Mueller S, Wang D, Fox MD, Yeo B, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, et al. Individual variability in functional connectivity architecture of the human brain. Neuron. 2013; 77(3):586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron. 2012.12.028
32. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009; 10(3):186-198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575
33. Tononi G, Sporns O, Edelman GM. A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994; 91 (11):5033-5037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033
34. Barnett L, Buckley CL, Bullock S. Neural complexity and structural connectivity. Physical Review E. 2009; 79(5):051914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051914
35. Galán RF. On how network architecture determines the dominant patterns of spontaneous neural activity. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002148
36. Robinson P. Interrelating anatomical, effective, and functional brain connectivity using propagators and neural field theory. Physical Review E. 2012; 85(1):011912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011912
37. Uhlenbeck GE, Ornstein LS. On the theory of the Brownian motion. Physical review. 1930; 36(5):823. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.36.823
38. Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann CF, Nichols TE, et al. Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(2):875-891. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063
39. Deco G, McIntosh AR, Shen K, Hutchison RM, Menon RS, Everling S, et al. Identification of Optimal Structural Connectivity Using Functional Connectivity and Neural Modeling. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014; 34(23):7910-7916. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4423-13.2014
40. Robinson P, Sarkar S, Pandejee GM, Henderson J. Determination of effective brain connectivity from functional connectivity with application to resting state connectivities. Physical Review E. 2014; 90 (1):012707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012707
41. Marrelec G, Kim J, Doyon J, Horwitz B. Large-scale neural model validation of partial correlation analysis for effective connectivity investigation in functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping. 2009; 30(3):941-950. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20555
42. Sutera A, Joly A, François-Lavet V, Qiu ZA, Louppe G, Ernst D, et al. Simple connectome inference from partial correlation statistics in calcium imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:14067865. 2014;.
43. Uddin LQ, Supekar KS, Ryali S, Menon V. Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011; 31(50):18578-18589. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011
44. Lauritzen SL. Graphical models. Clarendon Press; 1996.
45. Ritter P, Schirner M, McIntosh AR, Jirsa VK. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain Connectivity. 2013; 3(2):121-145. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0120
46. Schirner M, Rothmeier S, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR, Ritter P. An automated pipeline for constructing personalised virtual brains from multimodal neuroimaging data. NeuroImage. 2015;. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2015.03.055
47. Li L, Rilling JK, Preuss TM, Glasser MF, Damen FW, Hu X. Quantitative Assessment of a Framework for Creating Anatomical Brain Networks via Global Tractography. NeuroImage. 2012; 61(4):1017. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.071
48. Leonardi N, Van De Ville D. On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest. Neuroimage. 2015; 104:430-436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.007
49. Banerjee A, Tognoli E, Assisi CG, Kelso J, Jirsa VK. Mode level cognitive subtraction (MLCS) quantifies spatiotemporal reorganization in large-scale brain topographies. NeuroImage. 2008; 42(2):663-674. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.260
50. Steinke GK, Galán RF. Brain rhythms reveal a hierarchical network organization. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(10):e1002207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002207
51. Anderson JS, Ferguson MA, Lopez-Larson M, Yurgelun-Todd D. Reproducibility of single-subject functional connectivity measurements. American journal of neuroradiology. 2011; 32(3):548-555. doi: 10. 3174/ajnr.A2330
52. Park HJ, Friston K. Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science. 2013; 342(6158):1238411. doi: 10.1126/science.1238411
53. Watanabe T, Hirose S, Wada H, Imai Y, Machida T, Shirouzu I, et al. A pairwise maximum entropy model accurately describes resting-state human brain networks. Nature communications. 2013; 4:1370. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2388
54. Ritter P, Villringer A. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2006; 30 (6):823-838. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.008
55. Ritter P, Becker R, Freyer F, Villringer A. EEG quality: The image acquisition artefact. In: EEG-fMRI. Springer; 2010. p. 153-171.
56. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):968-980. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
57. Tournier J, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A, et al. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage. 2004; 23 (3):1176-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.037
58. Tournier J, Calamante F, Connelly A, et al. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage. 2007; 35(4):1459-1472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016
59. Liptrot MG, Sidaros K, Dyrby TB. Addressing the Path-Length-Dependency Confound in White Matter Tract Segmentation. PloS one. 2014; 9(5):e96247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096247
60. Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, Jones TB, Bandettini PA. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage. 2009; 44(3):893-905. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036
61. Masuda H, et al. On multidimensional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes driven by a general Lévy process. Bernoulli. 2004; 10(1):97-120. doi: 10.3150/bj/1077544605
62. Marrelec G, Krainik A, Duffau H, Pélégrini-Issac M, Lehéricy S, Doyon J, et al. Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(1):228-237. doi: 10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.057