A closer look at the apparent correlation of structural and functional connectivity in excitable neural networks

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Messé, Arnaud ^a   Hütt, Marc Thorsten ^b   König, Peter ^c   Hilgetag, Claus C ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN; HUMAN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; HUMANS; NERVE NET; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 84923086490     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep07870     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hagmann, P. et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e159 (2008).
2. Honey, C. J. et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 2035-40 (2009).
3. Hermundstad, A. M. et al. Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 6169-74 (2013).
4. Zhou, C., Zemanova, L., Zamora-Lopez, G., Hilgetag, C. C. & Kurths, J. Structurefunction relationship in complex brain networks expressed by hierarchical synchronization. New J. Phys. 9, 178 (2007).
5. Adachi, Y. et al. Functional connectivity between anatomically unconnected areas is shaped by collective network-level effects in the macaque cortex. Cereb. Cortex 22, 1586-92 (2011).
6. Cabral, J., Hugues, E., Kringelbach, M. L. & Deco, G. Modeling the outcome of structural disconnection on resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage 62, 1342-53 (2012).
7. Deco, G. et al. Identification of optimal structural connectivity using functional connectivity and neural modeling. J. Neurosci. 34, 7910-6 (2014).
8. Deco, G. et al. How local excitation-inhibition ratio impacts the whole brain dynamics. J. Neurosci. 34, 7886-98 (2014).
9. Garcia, G. C., Lesne, A., Hütt, M.-T. & Hilgetag, C. C. Building blocks of selfsustained activity in a simple deterministic model of excitable neural networks. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6, 50 (2012).
10. Fitzhugh, R. Mathematical models of excitation and propagation in nerve chap. 1, 1-85 (McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y., 1961).
11. Nagumo, J., Arimoto, S. & Yoshizawa, S. An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon. Proc. IRE, vol. 50, 2061-70 (1962).
12. Ghosh,A., Rho, Y.,McIntosh, A. R., Kotter, R.&Jirsa, V. Noise during rest enables the exploration of the brain's dynamic repertoire. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000196 (2008).
13. Stefanescu, R. A. & Jirsa, V. K. A low dimensional description of globally coupled heterogeneous neural networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000219 (2008).
14. Haimovici, A., Tagliazucchi, E., Balenzuela, P.&Chialvo, D. R. Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 178101 (2013).
15. Messé, A., Rudrauf, D., Benali, H. &Marrelec, G. Relating structure and function in the human brain: Relative contributions of anatomy, stationary dynamics, and non-stationarities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003530 (2014).
16. Takahashi, N., Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, W., Matsuki, N. & Ikegaya, Y. Circuit topology for synchronizing neurons in spontaneously active networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 10244-9 (2010).
17. Kauffman, S. Homeostasis and differentiation in random genetic control networks. Nature 224, 177-8 (1969).
18. Albert, R.&Othmer, H. G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in drosophila melanogaster. J. Theor. Biol. 223, 1-18 (2003).
19. Li, F., Long, T., Lu, Y., Ouyang, Q. & Tang, C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4781-6 (2004).
20. Davidich, M. I. & Bornholdt, S. Boolean network model predicts cell cycle sequence of fission yeast. PLoS ONE 3, e71786 (2008).
21. Davidich,M. I. &Bornholdt, S. Boolean network model predicts knockout mutant phenotypes of fission yeast. PLoS ONE 8, e717861 (2013).
22. Choi, M., Shi, J., Jung, S. H., Chen, X. & Cho, K.-H. Attractor landscape analysis reveals feedback loops in the p53 network that control the cellular response to dna damage. Sci. Signal. 5, ra83 (2012).
23. Bornholdt, S. SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: Less is more in modeling large genetic networks. Science 310, 449-51 (2005).
24. Rock, K., Brand, S., Moir, J. & Keeling, M. J. Dynamics of infectious diseases. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 026602 (2014).
25. Watts, D. J. & Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393, 440-2 (1998).
26. Satorras, R. P. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. E 65, 0351081 (2002).
27. Hufnagel, L., Brockmann, D. & Geisel, T. Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 15124-9 (2004).
28. Hütt, M. T., Kaiser, M. & Hilgetag, C. C. Perspective: Network-guided pattern formation of neural dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130522 (2014).
29. Maslov, S. & Sneppen, K. Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296, 910-13 (2002).