3D printing of versatile reactionware for chemical synthesis

Nature Protocols

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 920-936

  Kitson, Philip J ^a,b   Glatzel, Stefan ^b   Chen, Wei ^a   Lin, Chang Gen ^a   Song, Yu Fei ^a   Cronin, Leroy ^a,b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYPROPYLENE; SILICONE;

ARTICLE; CATALYST; CHEMICAL REACTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURIFICATION; REACTIONWARE; SYNTHESIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN;

CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES, SYNTHETIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; POLYPROPYLENES; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84983565529     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.041     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Dimitrov, D., Schreve, K. & de Beer, N. Advances in three dimensional printing-state of the art and future perspectives. Rapid Prototyping J. 12, 136-147 (2006).
2. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. & Stucker, B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag, 2015).
3. Rengier, F. et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 5, 335-341 (2010).
4. Li, X.M. et al. 3D-printed biopolymers for tissue engineering application. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2014, 1-13 (2014).
5. Skoog, S.A., Goering, P.L. & Narayan, R.J. Stereolithography in tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 25, 845-856 (2014).
6. Hollister, S.J. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 4, 518-524 (2005).
7. Barry, R.A. et al. Direct-write assembly of 3D hydrogel scaffolds for guided cell growth. Adv. Mater. 21, 2407-2410 (2009).
8. Hong, S. et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv. Mater. 27, 4035-4040 (2015).
9. Nakamura, M. et al. Biomatrices and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and biofabrication. Biofabrication 2, 014110 (2010).
10. Boland, T., Xu, T., Damon, B. & Cui, X. Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering. Biotechnol. J. 1, 910-917 (2006).
11. Zhang, Y., Tse, C., Rouholamin, D. & Smith, P. Scaffolds for tissue engineering produced by inkjet printing. Cent. Eur. J. Eng. 2, 325-335 (2012).
12. Mohanty, S. et al. Fabrication of scalable and structured tissue engineering scaffolds using water dissolvable sacrificial 3D printed moulds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 55, 569-578 (2015).
13. Kolesky, D.B. et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26, 3124-3130 (2014).
14. Mosadegh, B., Xiong, G., Dunham, S. & Min, J.K. Current progress in 3D printing for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 10, 034002 (2015).
15. Habibovic, P. et al. Osteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants. Biomaterials 29, 944-953 (2008).
16. Klammert, U. et al. Low temperature fabrication of magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds by 3D powder printing. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21, 2947-2953 (2010).
17. Ley, S.V., Fitzpatrick, D.E., Ingham, R.J. & Myers, R.M. Organic synthesis: march of the machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3449-3464 (2015).
18. Gross, B.C., Erkal, J.L., Lockwood, S.Y., Chen, C. & Spence, D.M. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal. Chem. 86, 3240-3253 (2014).
19. Symes, M.D. et al. Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis. Nat. Chem 4, 349-354 (2012).
20. Kitson, P.J., Symes, M.D., Dragone, V. & Cronin, L. Combining 3D printing and liquid handling to produce user-friendly reactionware for chemical synthesis and purification. Chem. Sci. 4, 3099-3103 (2013).
21. Jakus, A.E. et al. Three-dimensional printing of high-content graphene scaffolds for electronic and biomedical applications. ACS Nano 9, 4636-4648 (2015).
22. Lewis, J.A. Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 16, 2193-2204 (2006).
23. Kong, Y.L. et al. 3D printed quantum dot light-emitting diodes. Nano Lett. 14, 7017-7023 (2014).
24. Austin-Morgan, T. 3D printing of optical fibre. New Electron. 48, 8 (2015).
25. Pham, D.T. & Gault, R.S. A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 38, 1257-1287 (1998).
26. Wang, X. et al. i3DP, a robust 3D printing approach enabling genetic post-printing surface modification. Chem. Commun. 49, 10064-10066 (2013).
27. Xing, J.-F., Zheng, M.-L. & Duan, X.-M. Two-photon polymerization microfabrication of hydrogels: an advanced 3D printing technology for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5031-5039 (2015).
28. Tumbleston, J.R. et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 347, 1349-1352 (2015).
29. Park, S.H., Yang, D.Y. & Lee, K.S. Two-photon stereolithography for realizing ultraprecise three-dimensional nano/microdevices. Laser Photon. Rev. 3, 1-11 (2009).
30. Wallace, D. in Inkjet-based Micromanufacturing Vol. 9 Advanced Micro and Nanosystems (eds. Korvink, J.G., Smith, P.J. & Shin, D.-Y.) 1-14 (Wiley-VCH, 2012).
31. Shirazi, S.F.S. et al. A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16, 20 (2015).
32. Lee, K. et al. 3D-printed alginate/phenamil composite scaffolds constituted with microsized core-shell struts for hard tissue regeneration. RSC Adv. 5, 29335-29345 (2015).
33. Mironov, V., Boland, T., Trusk, T., Forgacs, G. & Markwald, R.R. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 157-161 (2003).
34. Dorey, E. Process technology 3D printing for drugs. Chem. Ind. 78, 7 (2014).
35. Icten, E., Giridhar, A., Taylor, L.S., Nagy, Z.K. & Reklaitis, G.V. Dropwise additive manufacturing of pharmaceutical products for melt-based dosage forms. J. Pharm. Sci. 104, 1641-1649 (2015).
36. Kumar, S. Selective laser sintering: a qualitative and objective approach. JOM J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 55, 43-47 (2003).
37. Agarwala, M., Bourell, D., Beaman, J., Marcus, H. & Barlow, J. Direct selective laser sintering of metals. Rapid Prototyping J. 1, 26-36 (1995).
38. Fischer, P. et al. Sintering of commercially pure titanium powder with a Nd: YAG laser source. Acta Mater. 51, 1651-1662 (2003).
39. Wang, F.L., Yi, C.Y., Wang, T., Yang, S.Z. & Zhao, G. A generating method for digital gear tooth surfaces. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 28, 474-485 (2006).
40. Capel, A.J. et al. Design and additive manufacture for flow chemistry. Lab Chip 13, 4583-4590 (2013).
41. Hwang, Y.H., Paydar, O.H. & Candler, R.N. 3D printed molds for non-planar PDMS microfluidic channels. Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 226, 137-142 (2015).
42. Mathieson, J.S., Rosnes, M.H., Sans, V., Kitson, P.J. & Cronin, L. Continuous parallel ESI-MS analysis of reactions carried out in a bespoke 3D printed device. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 4, 285-291 (2013).
43. Dragone, V., Sans, V., Rosnes, M.H., Kitson, P.J. & Cronin, L. 3D-printed devices for continuous-flow organic chemistry. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 9, 951-959 (2013).
44. Kitson, P.J., Rosnes, M.H., Sans, V., Dragone, V. & Cronin, L. Configurable 3D-printed millifluidic and microfluidic 'lab on a chip' reactionware devices. Lab Chip 12, 3267-3271 (2012).
45. Lee, M.P. et al. Development of a 3D printer using scanning projection stereolithography. Sci. Rep. 5, 9875 (2015).
46. Campbell, T.A. & Ivanova, O.S. 3D printing of multifunctional nanocomposites. Nano Today 8, 119-120 (2013).
47. Guo, S.-Z., Yang, X., Heuzey, M.-C. & Therriault, D. 3D printing of a multifunctional nanocomposite helical liquid sensor. Nanoscale 7, 6451-6456 (2015).
48. Kim, J.H. et al. 3D printing of reduced graphene oxide nanowires. Adv. Mater. 27, 157-161 (2015).
49. Peterson, G.I., Larsen, M.B., Ganter, M.A., Storti, D.W. & Boydston, A.J. 3D-printed mechanochromic materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 577-583 (2015).
50. Postiglione, G., Natale, G., Griffini, G., Levi, M. & Turri, S. Conductive 3D microstructures by direct 3D printing of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites via liquid deposition modeling. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 76, 110-114 (2015).
51. Visser, C.W. et al. Toward 3D printing of pure metals by laser-induced forward transfer. Adv. Mater. 27, 4087-4092 (2015).
52. Wei, X. et al. 3D printable graphene composite. Sci. Rep. 5, 11181 (2015).
53. Malone, E. et al. Freeform fabrication of zinc-air batteries and electromechanical assemblies. Rapid Prototyping J. 10, 58-69 (2004).
54. Ferrari, S. et al. Latest advances in the manufacturing of 3D rechargeable lithium microbatteries. J. Power Sources 286, 25-46 (2015).
55. Trimmer, B., Lewis, J.A., Shepherd, R.F. & Lipson, H. 3D printing soft materials: what is possible? Soft Robot. 2, 3-6 (2015).
56. Ilievski, F., Mazzeo, A.D., Shepherd, R.F., Chen, X. & Whitesides, G.M. Soft robotics for chemists. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 1890-1895 (2011).
57. Melin, J. & Quake, S.R. in Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure. Vol. 36 Annual Review of Biophysics 213-231 (Annual Reviews, 2007).
58. Kitson, P.J., Marshall, R.J., Long, D., Forgan, R.S. & Cronin, L. 3D printed high-throughput hydrothermal reactionware for discovery, optimization, and scale-up. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12723-12728 (2014).
59. Loiseau, T. et al. MIL-96, a porous aluminum trimesate 3D structure constructed from a hexagonal network of 18-membered rings and μ3-oxo-centered trinuclear units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10223-10230 (2006).