Lower-tropospheric mixing as a constraint on cloud feedback in a multiparameter multiphysics ensemble

Journal of Climate

Volumn 29, Issue 17, 2016, Pages 6259-6275

  Kamae, Youichi ^a,b   Shiogama, Hideo ^c   Watanabe, Masahiro ^d   Ogura, Tomoo ^c   Yokohata, Tokuta ^c   Kimoto, Masahide ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Circulation Dynamics; Climate models; Climate sensitivity; Cloud radiative effects; Feedback; Models and modeling; Physical Meteorology and Climatology; Radiative forcing

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION; CLOUDS; EARTH ATMOSPHERE; FEEDBACK; MIXING; TROPOSPHERE;

ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS; CLIMATE SENSITIVITY; CLOUD RADIATIVE EFFECTS; CUMULUS CONVECTION; MIXING INTENSITY; RADIATIVE FORCINGS; STRUCTURAL UNCERTAINTY; TOTAL UNCERTAINTIES;

CLIMATE MODELS;

ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; CLIMATE FEEDBACK; CLIMATE MODELING; CLOUD RADIATIVE FORCING; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; METEOROLOGY; TROPOSPHERE;

EID: 84983490086     PISSN: 08948755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0042.1     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrews, T., J. M. Gregory, M. J. Webb, and K. E. Taylor, 2012: Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09712, doi:10.1029/2012GL051607.
2. Andrews, T., J. M. Gregory, and M. J. Webb, 2015: The dependence of radiative forcing and feedback on evolving patterns of surface temperature change in climate models. J. Climate, 28, 1630-1648, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00545.1.
3. Armour, K. C., C. M. Bitz, and G. H. Roe, 2013: Time-varying climate sensitivity from regional feedbacks. J. Climate, 26, 4518-4534, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00544.1.
4. Bony, S., and J. L. Dufresne, 2005: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20806, doi:10.1029/2005GL023851.
5. Brient, F., and S. Bony, 2013: Interpretation of the positive low-cloud feedback predicted by a climate model under global warming. Climate Dyn., 40, 2415-2431, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1279-7.
6. Chikira, M., 2010: A cumulus parameterization with statedependent entrainment rate. Part II: Impact on climatology in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2194-2211, doi:10.1175/2010JAS3317.1.
7. Chikira, M., and M. Sugiyama, 2010: A cumulus parameterization with state-dependent entrainment rate. Part I: Description and sensitivity to temperature and humidity profiles. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2171-2193, doi:10.1175/2010JAS3316.1.
8. Collins, M., B. B. B. Booth, B. Bhaskaran, G. R. Harris, J. M. Murphy, D. M. Sexton, and M. J. Webb, 2011: Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: A comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles. Climate Dyn., 36, 1737-1766, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0808-0.
9. Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553-597, doi:10.1002/qj.828.
10. Demoto, S., M. Watanabe, and Y. Kamae, 2013: Mechanism of tropical low-cloud response to surface warming using weather and climate simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2427-2432, doi:10.1002/grl.50474.
11. Dufresne, J.-L., and S. Bony, 2008: An assessment of the primary sources of spread of global warming estimates from coupled atmosphere-ocean models. J. Climate, 21, 5135-5144, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2239.1.
12. Emori, S., A. Hasegawa, T. Suzuki, and K. Dairaku, 2005: Validation, parameterization dependence, and future projection of daily precipitation simulated with a high-resolution atmospheric GCM. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L06708, doi:10.1029/2004GL022306.
13. Fasullo, J. T., B. M. Sanderson, and K. E. Trenberth, 2015: Recent progress in constraining climate sensitivity with model ensembles. Curr. Climate Change Rep., 1, 268-275, doi:10.1007/s40641-015-0021-7.
14. Gettelman, A., J. E. Kay, and K. M. Shell, 2012: The evolution of climate sensitivity and climate feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Climate, 25, 1453-1469, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00197.1.
15. Hasumi, H., and S. Emori, Eds., 2004:K-1 coupledmodel (MIROC) description. K-1 Tech. Rep., 34 pp. [Available online at http://ccsr.aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/;hasumi/miroc_description.pdf.]
16. 2: A review. Curr. Climate Change Rep., 1, 103-113, doi:10.1007/s40641-015-0007-5.
17. Kamae, Y., T. Ogura, M. Watanabe, S.-P. Xie, and H. Ueda, 2016: Robust cloud feedback over tropical land in a warming climate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 2593-2609, doi:10.1002/2015JD024525.
18. Klein, S. A., and C. Jakob, 1999: Validation and sensitivities of frontal clouds simulated by the ECMWF model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2514-2531, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<2514: VASOFC>2.0.CO;2.
19. Klein, S. A., and A. Hall, 2015: Emergent constraints for cloud feedbacks. Curr. Climate Change Rep., 1, 276-287, doi:10.1007/s40641-015-0027-1.
20. Klocke, D., R. Pincus, and J. Quaas, 2011: On constraining estimates of climate sensitivity with present-day observations through model weighting. J. Climate, 24, 6092-6099, doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4193.1.
21. Knutti, R., and G. C. Hegerl, 2008: The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes. Nat. Geosci., 1, 735-743, doi:10.1038/ngeo337.
22. Knutti, R., D. Masson, and A. Gettelman, 2013: Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1194-1199, doi:10.1002/grl.50256.
23. Le Treut, H., and Z. X. Li, 1991: Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: Feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Climate Dyn., 5, 175-187, doi:10.1007/BF00251808.
24. Maslin, M., and P. Austin, 2012: Uncertainty: Climate models at their limit? Nature, 486, 183-184, doi:10.1038/486183a.
25. McKay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, 1979: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 239-245.
26. Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1791-1806, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1791: AHOTCM>2.0.CO;2.
27. Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys., 20, 851-875, doi:10.1029/RG020i004p00851.
28. Murphy, J., D. M. H. Sexton, D. N. Barnett, G. S. Jones, M. J. Webb, M. Collins, and D. A. Stainforth, 2004: Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature, 430, 768-772, doi:10.1038/nature02771.
29. Nakanishi, M., 2001: Improvement of the Mellor-Yamada turbulence closure model based on large-eddy simulation data. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 99, 349-378, doi:10.1023/A:1018915827400.
30. Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2004: An improved Mellor-Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: Its design and verification. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112, 1-31, doi:10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020164.04146.98.
31. Ogura, T., S. Emori, M. J. Webb, Y. Tsushima, T. Yokohata, A. Abe-Ouchi, and M. Kimoto, 2008: Towards understanding cloud response in atmospheric GCMs: The use of tendency diagnostics. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 86, 69-79, doi:10.2151/jmsj.86.69.
32. Pan, D. M., and D. A. Randall, 1998: A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 949-981, doi:10.1002/qj.49712454714.
33. Piani, C., D. J. Frame, D. A. Stainforth, and M. R. Allen, 2005: Constraints on climate change from a multi-thousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23825, doi:10.1029/2005GL024452.
34. Pincus, R., S. Platnick, S. A. Ackerman, R. S. Hemler, and R. J. P. Hofmann, 2012: Reconciling simulated and observed views of clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the limits of instrument simulators. J. Climate, 25, 4699-4720, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00267.1.
35. Qu, X., A. Hall, S. A. Klein, and P. M. Caldwell, 2014: On the spread of changes in marine low cloud cover in climate model simulations of the 21st century. Climate Dyn., 42, 2603-2626, doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1945-z.
36. Reichler, T., and J. Kim, 2008: How well do coupled models simulate today's climate? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 303-311, doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-3-303.
37. Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2011:MERRA: NASA's Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Climate, 24, 3624-3648, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1.
38. Sanderson, B. M., 2011: A multimodel study of parametric uncertainty in predictions of climate response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations. J. Climate, 24, 1362-1377, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3498.1.
39. Sanderson, B. M., K. M. Shell, and W. Ingram, 2010: Climate feedbacks determined using radiative kernels in a multithousand member ensemble of AOGCMs. Climate Dyn., 35, 1219-1236, doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0661-1.
40. Sherwood, S. C., C. L. Meyer, R. J. Allen, and H. A. Titchner, 2008: Robust tropospheric warming revealed by iteratively homogenized radiosonde data. J. Climate, 21, 5336-5352, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2320.1.
41. Sherwood, S. C., S. Bony, and J.-L. Dufresne, 2014: Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing. Nature, 505, 37-42, doi:10.1038/nature12829.
42. Shiogama, M., and Coauthors, 2012: Perturbed physics ensemble using the MIROC5 coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM without flux corrections: Experimental design and results. Climate Dyn., 39, 3041-3056, doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1441-x.
43. Shiogama, M., M. Watanabe, T. Ogura, T. Yokohata, and M. Kimoto, 2014: Multi-parameter multi-physics ensemble (MPMPE): A new approach exploring the uncertainties of climate sensitivity. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 15, 97-102, doi:10.1002/asl2.472.
44. Soden, B. J., I. M. Held, R. Colman, K. M. Shell, J. T. Kiehl, and C. A. Shields, 2008: Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Climate, 21, 3504-3520, doi:10.1175/2007JCLI2110.1.
45. Stainforth, D. A., and Coauthors, 2005: Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 433, 403-406, doi:10.1038/nature03301.
46. Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl, 2012: An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 485-498, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.
47. Tebaldi, C., and R. Knutti, 2007: The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 365A, 2053-2075, doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2076.
48. Tomassini, L., A. Voigt, and B. Stevens, 2015: On the connection between tropical circulation, convective mixing, and climate sensitivity. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1404-1416, doi:10.1002/qj.2450.
49. Tsushima, Y., and Coauthors, 2006: Importance of the mixedphase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: A multimodel study. Climate Dyn., 27, 113-126, doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0127-7.
50. Vial, J., J.-L. Dufresne, and S. Bony, 2013: On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates. Climate Dyn., 41, 3339-3362, doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9.
51. Watanabe, M., S. Emori, M. Satoh, and H. Miura, 2009: A PDFbased hybrid prognostic cloud scheme for general circulation models. Climate Dyn., 33, 795-816, doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0489-0.
52. Watanabe, M., and Coauthors, 2010: Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: Mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J. Climate, 23, 6312-6335, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1.
53. Watanabe, M., and Coauthors, 2012: Using a multi-physics ensemble for exploring diversity in cloud-shortwave feedback in GCMs. J. Climate, 25, 5416-5431, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00564.1.
54. Webb, M., C. Senior, S. Bony, and J. J. Morcrette, 2001: Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models. Climate Dyn., 17, 905-922, doi:10.1007/s003820100157.
55. Webb, M., and Coauthors, 2006: On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. Climate Dyn., 27, 17-38, doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0111-2.
56. Webb, M., F. Lambert, and J. Gregory, 2013: Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing and feedback in climate models. Climate Dyn., 40, 677-707, doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1336-x.
57. Wilson, D. R., and S. P. Ballard, 1999: A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1607-1636, doi:10.1002/qj.49712555707.
58. Yamazaki, K., and Coauthors, 2013:Obtaining diverse behaviors in a climate model without the use of flux adjustments. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2781-2793, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50304.
59. 2 increase between two perturbed physics ensembles. J. Climate, 23, 1392-1410, doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2917.1.
60. Yokohata, T., and Coauthors, 2013: Reliability and importance of structural diversity of climate model ensembles. Climate Dyn., 41, 2745-2763, doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1733-9.
61. Zelinka, M. D., S. A. Klein, and D. L. Hartmann, 2012a: Computing and partitioning cloud feedbacks using cloud property histograms. Part I: Cloud radiative kernels. J. Climate, 25, 3715-3735, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00248.1.
62. Zelinka, M. D., S. A. Klein, and D. L. Hartmann, 2012b: Computing and partitioning cloud feedbacks using cloud property histograms. Part II: Attribution to changes in cloud amount, altitude, and optical depth. J. Climate, 25, 3736-3754, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00249.1.
63. Zelinka, M. D., S. A. Klein, K. Taylor, T. Andrews, M. Webb, J. Gregory, and P. Forster, 2013: Contributions of different cloud types to feedbacks and rapid adjustments in CMIP5. J. Climate, 26, 5007-5027, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00555.1.
64. Zhang, M., and Coauthors, 2013: CGILS: Results from the first phase of an international project to understand the physical mechanisms of low cloud feedbacks in single column models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, 826-842, doi:10.1002/2013MS000246.
65. Zhao, M., 2014: An investigation of the connections among convection, clouds, and climate sensitivity in a global climatemodel. J. Climate, 27, 1845-1862, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00145.1.