Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: A qualitative framework analysis of patient narratives

Diabetes Care

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 544-550

  Pickup, John C ^a   Holloway, Melissa Ford ^b   Samsi, Kritika ^c  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b INPUT Patient Advocacy   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN PUMP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SAFETY; SLEEP QUALITY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD; CAREGIVER; DEVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEAR; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN INFUSION; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; YOUNG ADULT;

GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; INSULIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CAREGIVERS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938589838     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: 19355548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1855     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mastrototaro JJ. The MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther 2000;2(Suppl. 1):S13-S18.
2. Joubert M, Reznik Y. Personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management: review of the literature and implementation for practical use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;96:294-305.
3. Choudhary P, Shin J, Wang Y, et al. Insulin pump therapy with automated insulin suspension in response to hypoglycemia: reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia in those at greatest risk. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2023-2025.
4. Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, et al.; ASPIRE In-Home Study Group. Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 2013;369:224-232.
5. Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 2011;343:d3805.
6. Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:795-800.
7. Choudhary P, Ramasamy S, Green L, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring significantly reduces severe hypoglycemia in hypoglycemia-unaware patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36:4160-4162.
8. Ly TT, Nicholas JA, Retterath A, Lim EM, Davis EA, Jones TW. Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013;310: 1240-1247.
9. Tansey M, Laffel L, Cheng J, et al.; Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2011;28:1118-1122.
10. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Beck RW, Lawrence JM, Laffel L, et al. Quality of life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2010;33: 2175-2177.
11. Markowitz JT, Pratt K, Aggarwal J, Volkening LK, Laffel LM. Psychological correlates of continuous glucose monitoring use in youth and adults with type 1 diabetes of youth. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:1-4.
12. Halford J, Harris C. Determining clinical and psychological benefits and barriers with continuous glucose monitoring therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:201-205.
13. Polonsky WH, Hessler D. What are the quality of life-related benefits and losses associated with real-time continuous glucose monitoring? A survey of current users. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013;15:295-301.
14. Ramchandani N, Arya S, Ten S, Bhandari S. Real-life utilization of real-time continuous glucose monitoring: the complete picture. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2011;5:860-870.
15. Brain J, Schofield J, Gerrish K, et al. A guide for clinical audit, research and service review. Health Quality Improvement Partnership. Available from http://www.hqip.org.uk Accessed 14 October 2014.
16. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analyzing qualitative data. BMJ 2000;320:114-116.
17. Richie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analysing Qualitative Data. Bryman A, Burgess RG, Eds. London, Routledge, 1994, p. 173-194.
18. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London, Sage Publications, 2003.
19. Pickup JC. The evidence base for diabetes technology: Appropriate and inappropriate meta-analysis. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2013;7: 1567-1574.
20. Choi BC, Pak AW. A catalogue of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2: 1-13.