Our own speech rate influences speech perception

Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

Volumn 2016-January, Issue , 2016, Pages 227-231

  Bosker, Hans Rutger ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Phonetic convergence; Rate normalization; Selfmonitoring; Speech rate

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; LINGUISTICS;

COMMON SOURCE; PHONETIC CONVERGENCE; RATE EFFECTS; SELF-MONITORING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RATES; TARGET WORDS;

SPEECH;

EID: 84982892903     PISSN: 23332042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.21437/speechprosody.2016-47     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. P. Ladefoged and D. E. Broadbent, "Information conveyed by vowels," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 29, pp. 98-104, 1957.
2. J. L. Miller and A. M. Liberman, "Some effects of lateroccurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel," Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 25, pp. 457-465, 1979.
3. H. R. Bosker and E. Reinisch, "Normalization for speechrate in native and nonnative speech.," in Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2015 [ICPhS XVIII], Glasgow, M. Wolters, J. Livingstone, B. B., R. Smith, M. MacMahon, J. Stuart-Smith, et al., Eds., 2015.
4. M. J. Sjerps and E. Reinisch, "Divide and conquer: How perceptual contrast sensitivity and perceptual learning cooperate in reducing input variation in speech perception," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 41, pp. 710-722, 2015.
5. E. Reinisch and M. J. Sjerps, "The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context," Journal of Phonetics, vol. 41, pp. 101-116, 2013.
6. T. Wade and L. L. Holt, "Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories," Perception & psychophysics, vol. 67, pp. 939-950, 2005.
7. H. R. Bosker, E. Reinisch, and M. J. Sjerps, "Listening under cognitive load makes speech sound fast.," in Proceedings of the Speech Processing in Realistic Environments [SPIRE] workshop, Groningen, H. v. d. Heuvel, B. Cranen, and S. Mattys, Eds., 2016, pp. 23-24.
8. R. S. Newman and J. R. Sawusch, "Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another," Journal of Phonetics, vol. 37, pp. 46-65, 2009.
9. J. R. Sawusch and R. S. Newman, "Perceptual normalization for speaking rate II: Effects of signal discontinuities," Perception & psychophysics, vol. 62, pp. 285-300, 2000.
10. T. Stivers, N. J. Enfield, P. Brown, C. Englert, M. Hayashi, T. Heinemann, et al., "Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, pp. 10587-10592, 2009.
11. J. Koreman, "Perceived speech rate: The effects of articulation rate and speaking style in spontaneous speech," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 582-596, 2006.
12. S. Schwab, "Relationship between speech rate perceived and produced by the listener," Phonetica, vol. 68, pp. 243-255, 2011.
13. H. R. Bosker, A.-F. Pinget, H. Quené, T. J. M. Sanders, and N. H. De Jong, "What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs," Language Testing, vol. 30, pp. 157-175, 2013.
14. J. F. Houde, S. Nagarajan, K. Sekihara, and M. M. Merzenich, "Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study," Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 14, pp. 1125-1138, 2002.
15. J. F. Houde and S. S. Nagarajan, "Speech production as state feedback control," Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 5, 2011.
16. J. Numminen and G. Curio, "Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel-evoked responses of the human auditory cortex," Neuroscience letters, vol. 272, pp. 29-32, 1999.
17. Y.-C. Tsao and G. Weismer, "Interspeaker variation in habitual speaking rate: Evidence for a neuromuscular component," Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 40, pp. 858-866, 1997.
18. H. Quené, "Multilevel modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 123, pp. 1104-1113, 2008.
19. H. Quené, "Longitudinal trends in speech tempo: The case of Queen Beatrix," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 133, pp. EL452-EL457, 2013.
20. P. Boersma and D. Weenink, "Praat: doing phonetics by computer" [computer program], 2012.
21. H. Quené and H. Van den Bergh, "Examples of mixedeffects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data," Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 59, pp. 413-425, 2008.
22. D. Bates, M. Maechler, and B. Bolker, "lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes", 2012.
23. R Development Core Team, "R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing", 2012.
24. J. S. Pardo, "Expressing oneself in conversational interaction," in Expressing oneself/Expressing one's self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity, E. Morsella, Ed., New York: Psychology Press, 2010, pp. 183-196.
25. M. Natale, "Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 32, p. 790, 1975.
26. K. Nielsen, "Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation," Journal of Phonetics, vol. 39, pp. 132-142, 2011.
27. L. Bell, J. Gustafson, and M. Heldner, "Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction.," in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2003
28. [ICPhS XV], Barcelona. vol. 3, 2003, pp. 833-836.
29. M. K. Jungers and J. M. Hupp, "Speech priming: Evidence for rate persistence in unscripted speech," Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 24, pp. 611-624, 2009.
30. I. Finlayson, R. J. Lickley, and M. Corley, "Convergence of speech rate: Interactive alignment beyond representation.," in Proceedings of the 25th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, 2012, p. 24.
31. H. Giles, N. Coupland, and I. Coupland, Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
32. J. S. Pardo, "On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 2382-2393, 2006.
33. J. S. Pardo, R. Gibbons, A. Suppes, and R. M. Krauss, "Phonetic convergence in college roommates," Journal of Phonetics, vol. 40, pp. 190-197, 2012.
34. M. Wilson and T. P. Wilson, "An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking," Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 12, pp. 957-968, 2005.
35. M. J. Pickering and S. Garrod, "Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 169-189, 2004.
36. M. Natale, "Social desirability as related to convergence of temporal speech patterns," Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 40, pp. 827-830, 1975.
37. J. S. Pardo, I. C. Jay, and R. M. Krauss, "Conversational role influences speech imitation," Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 72, pp. 2254-2264, 2010.
38. C. R. Berger and M. E. Roloff, "Social cognition, selfawareness, and interpersonal communication.," in Progress in communication sciences. vol. 2, B. Dervin and M. J. Voight, Eds., Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1980, pp. 1-49.
39. H. Giles and P. F. Powesland, Speech style and social evaluation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.