Perceptual normalization for speaking rate II: Effects of signal discontinuities

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 285-300

  Sawusch, James R ^a,b   Newman, Rochelle S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034132593     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205549     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AINSWORTH, W. A. (1972). Duration as a cue in the recognition of synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 648-651.
2. BREGMAN, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. BYRD, D. (1992). Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 593-596.
4. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1982). Segmental duration in connected-speech signals: Preliminary results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 705-716.
5. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1988a). The duration of American-English vowels: An overview. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 263-284.
6. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1988b). A note on the durations of fricatives in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1932-1935.
7. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1988c). Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1553-1573.
8. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1988d). Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Syllabic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1574-1585.
9. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1990). Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 101-112.
10. DIEHL, R. L., & WALSH, M. A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2154-2164.
11. FLEGE, J. E., & SCHMIDT, A. M. (1995). Native speakers of Spanish show rate-dependent processing of English stop consonants. Phonetica, 52, 90-111.
12. FOWLER, C. A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1236-1249.
13. GANONG, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 110-125.
14. GREEN, K. P., STEVENS, E. B., & KUHL, P. K. (1994). Talker continuity and the use of rate information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 249-260.
15. KIDD, G. R. (1989). Articulatory-rate context effects in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 736-748.
16. KLATT, D. H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 971-995.
17. LIBERMAN, A. M., & MATTINGLY, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
18. LISKER, L., & ABRAMSON, A. E. (1964). A cross language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
19. LOTTO, A. J., KLUENDER, K. R., & GREEN, K. P. (1996). Spectral discontinuities and the vowel length effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1005-1014.
20. MILLER, J. L. (1981). Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In P. D. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 39-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. MILLER, J. L., & DEXTER, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 369-378.
22. MILLER, J. L., GROSJEAN, F., & LOMANTO, C. (1984). Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: A reanalysis and some implications. Phonetica, 41, 215-225.
23. MILLER, J. L., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457-465.
24. MILLER, J. L., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 505-512.
25. MILLER, J. L., & WAYLAND, S. C. (1993). Limits on the limitations of context-conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w]. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 205-210.
26. NEWMAN, R. S., & SAWUSCH, J. R. (1996). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 540-560.
27. PATTERSON, R. D., HOLDSWORTH, J., & ALLERHAND, M. (1992). Auditory models as preprocessors for speech recognition. In M. E. H. Schouten (Ed.), The auditory processing of speech: From the auditory periphery to words (pp. 67-83). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. PISONI, D. B., CARRELL, T. D., & GANS, S. J. (1983). Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 314-322.
29. PISONI, D. B., & SAWUSCH, J. R. (1975). Some stages of processing in speech perception. In A. Cohen & S. G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and process in speech perception (pp. 16-34). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. REMEZ, R. E., RUBIN, P. E., BERNS, S. M., PARDO, J. S., & LANG, J. M. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.
31. SAMUEL, A. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 452-499.
32. SAWUSCH, J. R. (1976). Selective adaptation effects on end-point stimuli in a speech series. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 61-65.
33. SHINN, P. C., BLUMSTEIN, S. E., & JONGMAN, A. (1985). Limitations of context conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w]. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 397-407.
34. SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1074-1095.