The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 101-116

  Reinisch, Eva ^a   Sjerps, Matthias J ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874359901     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adank P., van Hout R., Smits R. An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:1729-1738.
2. Adank P., van Hout R., van de Velde H. An acoustic description of the vowels of northern and southern standard Dutch II: Regional varieties. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007, 121:1130-1141.
3. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:419-439.
4. Baayen H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effect modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412.
5. Barr D.J. Analyzing 'visual world' eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:457-474.
6. Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (version 0.999375-27) [software application].
7. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). PRAAT, doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1) [computer program].
8. Brady S.A., Darwin C.J. Range effects in perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1978, 63:1556-1558.
9. Broadbent D.E., Ladefoged P. Vowel judgments and adaption level. Proceedings of the Royal Society 1960, 151:384-399.
10. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
11. Crystal T.H., House A.S. Segmental durations in connected speech signals: Preliminary results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1982, 72:705-716.
12. Crystal T.H., House A.S. Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 83:1553-1573.
13. Cutler A., Chen H.C. Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken word-processing. Perception & Psychophysics 1997, 59:165-179.
14. Dahan D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Hogan E.M. Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001, 16:507-534.
15. Escudero P., Benders T., Lipski S. Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:452-466.
16. Gerrits, E. (2001). The categorisation of speech sounds by adults and children. Doctoral Dissertation. Utrecht University. http://www.isbn:90-76912-08-4/.
17. Green K.P., Stevens E.B., Kuhl P.K. Talker continuity and the use of rate information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 55:249-260.
18. Green K.P., Tomiak G.R., Kuhl P.K. The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics 1997, 59:675-692.
19. Holt L.L. Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science 2005, 16:305-312.
20. Holt L.L. The mean matters: Effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:2801-2817.
21. Holt L.L., Lotto A.J. Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects. Hearing Research 2002, 167:156-169.
22. Huettig F., McQueen J.M. The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:460-482.
23. Jaeger T.F. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:434-446.
24. Johnson K. Speaker normalization in speech perception. The handbook of speech perception 2005, 363-389. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. D.B. Pisoni, R.E. Remez (Eds.).
25. Johnson K., Strand E.A., D'Imperio M. Auditory visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics 1999, 27:359-384.
26. Kluender K.R., Coady J.A., Kiefte M. Sensitivity to change in perception of speech. Speech Communication 2003, 41:59-69.
27. Kidd G.R. Articulatory-rate context effects in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:736-748.
28. Lotto A.J., Kluender K.R. General contrast effects of speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:602-619.
29. Lotto A.J., Sullivan S.C., Holt L.L. Central locus for nonspeech context effects on phonetic identification (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:53-56.
30. Malins J.G., Joanisse M.F. The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 62:407-420.
31. Matin E., Shao K.C., Boff K.R. Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccadic overhead. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 53:372-380.
32. McMurray B., Clayards M.A., Tanenhaus M., Aslin R. Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:1064-1071.
33. McQueen J.M., Viebahn M. Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:661-671.
34. Miller J.O., Patterson T., Ulrich R. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:99-115.
35. Miller J.L. Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. Perspectives on the study of speech 1981, 39-74. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA. P.D. Eimas, J.L. Miller (Eds.).
36. Miller J.L. Rate-dependent processing in speech perception. Progress in the psychology of language 1987, Vol. 3:119-157. Erlbaum Associates, London, UK.
37. Nearey T.M. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989, 85:2088-2113.
38. Nearey T.M., Assmann P.F. Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1986, 80:1297.
39. Newman R.S., Sawusch J.R. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:46-65.
40. Nooteboom S.G., Coden A. Het proces van spreken en verstaan, een nieuwe inleidingin de experimentele fonetiek 1984, Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands.
41. Peterson G.E., Barney H.L. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1952, 24:175-184.
42. Quené H., Van Den Bergh H. Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:413-425.
43. Reinisch E., Jesse A., McQueen J.M. Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:978-996.
44. Reinisch E., Jesse A., McQueen J.M. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue. Language and Speech 2011, 54:147-165.
45. Sawusch J.R., Newman R.S. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate II: Effects of signal discontinuities. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:285-300.
46. Sawusch J.R., Nusbaum H.C. Contextual effects in vowel perception 1 anchor-induced contrast effects. Perception & Psychophysics 1979, 25:292-302.
47. Shatzman K.B., McQueen J.M. Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:1-16.
48. Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 107:2697-2703.
49. Sjerps M.J., Mitterer H., McQueen J.M. Constraints on the processes responsible for the extrinsic normalization of vowels. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2011, 73:1195-1215.
50. Sjerps M.J., Mitterer H., McQueen J.M. Listening to different speakers: On the time-course of perceptual compensation for vocal-tract characteristics. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3831-3846.
51. Summerfield Q. Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:1074-1095.
52. Summerfield Q., Haggard M., Foster J., Gray S. Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect. Perception & Psychophsyics 1984, 35:203-213.
53. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632-1634.
54. Ulrich R., Miller J.O. Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:816-827.
55. van Heuven V.J., van Houten J.E., De Vries J.W. De perceptie van Nederlandse klinkers door Turken. Spektator 1986, 15:225-238.
56. Watkins A.J. Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral envelope distortion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 90:2942-2955.
57. Watkins A.J., Makin S.J. Perceptual compensation for speaker differences and for spectral-envelope distortion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 96:1263-1282.
58. Watkins A.J., Makin S.J. Effects of spectral contrast on perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 99:3749-3757.
59. West P. Perception of distributed coarticulatory properties of English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics 1999, 27:405-426.
60. Wilson J.P. An auditory after-image in frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing 1970, Sijthoff, Leiden, The Netherlands. R. Plomp, G.F. Smoorenburg (Eds.).