Conversational role influences speech imitation

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2254-2264

  Pardo, Jennifer S ^a   Jay, Isabel Cajori ^b   Krauss, Robert M ^c  

^a MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047689153     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196699     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ANDERSON, A. H., BADER, M., BARD, E. G., BOYLE, E., DOHERTY, G., GARROD, S., ET AL. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language & Speech, 34, 351-366.
2. APPLE, W., STREETER, L. A., & KRAUSS, R. M. (1979). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 715-727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.715
3. BARD, E. G., ANDERSON, A. H., SOTILLO, C., AYLETT, M., DOHERTY-SNEDDON, G., & NEWLANDS, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 1-22.
4. BILOUS, F. R., & KRAUSS, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language & Communication, 8, 183-194. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90016-X
5. BOURHIS, R. Y., & GILES, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119-135). London: Academic Press.
6. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1991). Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change. In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 313-338). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. BROWN, B. L., STRONG, W. J., & RENCHER, A. C. (1974). Fifty-four voices from two: The effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 313-318. doi:10.1121/1.1914504
8. BYRD, D. (1994). Relations of sex and dialect to reduction. Speech Communication, 15, 39-54. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90039-6
9. CLOPPER, C. G., CONREY, B., & PISONI, D. B. (2005). Effects of talker gender on dialect categorization. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 24, 182-206. doi:10.1177/0261927X05275741
10. DELVAUX, V., & SOQUET, A. (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64, 145-173.
11. ECKERT, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453-476.
12. ECKERT, P., & MCCONNELL-GINET, S. (1999). New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28, 185-201.
13. FOWLER, C. A., BROWN, J. M., SABADINI, L., & WEIHING, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 396-413.
14. FOWLER, C. A., & HOUSUM, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 489-504. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90136-7
15. FOWLER, C. A., LEVY, E., & BROWN, J. M. (1997). Reductions of spoken words in certain discourse contexts. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2504
16. GENTILUCCI, M., & BERNARDIS, P. (2007). Imitation during phoneme production. Neuropsychologia, 45, 608-615.
17. GILES, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87-109.
18. GILES, H., COUPLAND, J., & COUPLAND, N. (Eds.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
20. GREGORY, S. W., & WEBSTER, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 1231-1240. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231
21. GROSJEAN, F., & LANE, H. (1976). How the listener integrates the components of speaking rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 538-543. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.538
22. JUNGERS, M. K., & HUPP, J. M. (2009). Speech priming: Evidence for rate persistence in unscripted speech. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 611-624. doi:10.1080/01690960802602241
23. KRALJIC, T., BRENNAN, S. E., & SAMUEL, A. G. (2008). Accommodating variation: Dialects, idiolects, and speech processing. Cognition, 107, 54-81.
24. KRALJIC, T., SAMUEL, A. G., & BRENNAN, S. E. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19, 332-338.
25. LABOV, W. (1974). Linguistic change as a form of communication. In A. Silverstein (Ed.), Human communication: Theoretical explorations (pp. 221-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. LABOV, W. (1986). Sources of inherent variation in the speech process. In J. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 402-425). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. LABOV, W. (2006). A sociolinguistic perspective on sociophonetic research. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 500-515.
28. LABOV, W., ASH, S., & BOBERG, C. (2006). The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. LIBERMAN, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. MILLER, J. L., & GROSJEAN, F. (1981). How the components of speaking rate influence perception of phonetic segments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 208-215. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.208
31. MITTERER, H., & ERNESTUS, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition, 109, 168-173. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002
32. NAMY, L. L., NYGAARD, L. C., & SAUERTEIG, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 21, 422-432.
33. NEAREY, T. M. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2088-2113.
34. PARDO, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382-2393.
35. PARDO, J. S. (2010). Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. In E. Morsella (Ed.), Expressing oneself/expressing one's self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity (pp. 183-196). New York: Psychology Press.
36. PARDO, J. S., & REMEZ, R. E. (2006). The perception of speech. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 201-248). New York: Academic Press.
37. PETERSON, G. E., & BARNEY, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175-184.
38. PICKERING, M. J., & GARROD, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 169-226.
39. PICKERING, M. J., & GARROD, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105-110.
40. PISONI, D. B., & TASH, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 285-290.
41. PUTNAM, W. B., & STREET, R. L., JR. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech-accommodation theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 97-114.
42. RICHARDSON, M. J., MARSH, K. L., ISENHOWER, R. W., GOODMAN, J. R. L., & SCHMIDT, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867-891. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
43. RIZZOLATTI, G., & CRAIGHERO, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
44. SCHMIDT, R. C., RICHARDSON, M. J., ARSENAULT, C., & GALANTUCCI, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 860-870. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.860
45. SHEPARD, C. A., GILES, H., & LE POIRE, B. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33-56). New York: Wiley.
46. SHOCKLEY, K., SABADINI, L., & FOWLER, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 422-429.
47. STREET, R. L., JR. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11, 139-169.
48. THOMAS, E. R., & KENDALL, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. [Online resource: http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/]
49. THOMAS, E. R., KENDALL, T., YEAGER-DROR, M., & KRETZSCHMAR, W. (2007). Two things sociolinguists should know: Software packages for vowel normalization, and accessing linguistic atlas data. Paper presented at Workshop at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 36. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
50. THOMSON, R., MURACHVER, T., & GREEN, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12, 171-175. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00329
51. VALLABHA, G. K., & TULLER, B. (2004). Perceptuomotor bias in the imitation of steady-state vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1184-1197.
52. WILSON, M., & WILSON, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 957-968.