Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners

Progress in Orthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Jacob, Helder B ^a   Wyatt, Graydon D ^a   Buschang, Peter H ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANINE HEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE; HUMAN; INTERCANINE WIDTH; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERMOLAR WIDTH; MANDIBLE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; POSTERIOR ARCH LENGTH; PREMOLAR CROWN DIAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; ADULT; ANATOMIC MODEL; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DEVICES; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH CROWN;

ADULT; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; OPTICAL IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOOTH CROWN;

EID: 84982798796     PISSN: 17237785     EISSN: 21961042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-015-0108-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sweeney WT, Taylor DF. Dimensional changes in dental stone and plaster. J Dent Res. 1950;29:749–55.
2. Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials. 7th ed. Philadelphia PA: WB Saunders Co; 1973. p. p682.
3. Peluso MJ, Sd J, Levine SW, Lorei BJ. Digital models: an introduction. Semin Orthod. 2004;10:226–38.
4. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Vogels III DS, Vogels PB. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48:607–30.
5. Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:194–200.
6. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Sigusch BW, Thompson GA, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro. J Dent. 2013;41:271–7.
7. Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48:337–47.
8. Villarrubia JS. Algorithms for scanned probe microscope image simulation, surface reconstruction, and tip estimation. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1997;102:425–54.
9. Axelsson P. Processing of laser scanner data—algorithms and applications. J Photogrammetry Remote Sensing. 1999;54:138–47.
10. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:794–803.
11. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136: 16.e1-4.
12. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:1–16.
13. Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:269–73.
14. Hayashi K, Uechi J, Murata M, Mizoguchi I. Comparison of maxillary canine retraction with sliding mechanics and a retraction spring: a three-dimensional analysis based on a midpalatal orthodontic implant. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:585–9.
15. Kim J, Heo G, Lagravère MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:443–50.
16. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44:69–76.
17. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos SS, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:542–51.
18. Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J. 2009;25:97–103.
19. Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146:673–82.
20. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:471–8.
21. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940.
22. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:676–80.
23. Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: Diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144:831–7.
24. El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:259–65.
25. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley; 1981.
26. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic casts. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:301–6.
27. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod. 2009;36:36–41.
28. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:346–52.
29. Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y, Schneor R, Holdstein Y, Fischer A. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:90–5.