Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique

Korean Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 69-76

  Kim, Jae Hong ^a   Kim, Ki Baek ^a   Kim, Woong Chul ^a   Kim, Ji Hwan ^a   Kim, Hae Young ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Intraoral scanning; Precision; Three dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896466603     PISSN: 12255610     EISSN: 2005372X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Henkel S. A better first impression: manufacturing dental restorations using impressions. J Dent Technology 2008;13-6.
2. Jones P. The iTero optical scanner for use with Invisalign: A descriptive review. Dent Implantol Update 2008;19:1-4.
3. Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Lisle DA. Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy. Australas Radiol 1994;38:106-11.
4. Kragskov J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Gyldensted C, Jensen KL. A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:402-11.
5. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:308-13.
6. Lill W, Solar P, Ulm C, Watzek G, Blahout R, Matejka M. Reproducibility of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:233-6.
7. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
8. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.
9. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
10. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803.
11. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009;23: 288-95.
12. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:16.e1-4.
13. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:346-52.
14. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008;35:191-201.
15. Creed B, Kau CH, English JD, Xia JJ, Lee RP. A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 2011;17: 49-56.
16. Alcan T, Ceylanoǧlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.
17. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.; 1940. p. 122-32.
18. Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 2004;19: 288-97.
19. Bland JM. Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
20. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986. p.76-8.
21. BeGole EA. Statistics for the orthodontist. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, eds. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 339-52.
22. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36:36-41.
23. Mok KH, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:653-61.
24. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:517-22.
25. Linnet K. Limitations of the paired t-test for evaluation of method comparison data. Clin Chem 1999;45:314-5.
26. Donatelli RE, Lee SJ. How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:156-61.
27. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:521-6.
28. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:494, 496, 498-505.
29. Klein HM, Schneider W, Alzen G, Voy ED, Günther RW. Pediatric craniofacial surgery: comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing. Pediatr Radiol 1992;22:458-60.
30. Petrzelka JE, Frank MC. Advanced process planning for subtractive rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping J 2010;16:216-24.