Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: Diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 831-837

  Akyalcin, Sercan ^a   Dyer, David J ^b   English, Jeryl D ^a   Sar, Cagla ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b Research Development Test and Evaluation Division Code 524   (Japan)

^c BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84888590282     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. M.J. Peluso, S.D. Josell, S.W. Levine, and B.J. Lorei Digital models: an introduction Semin Orthod 10 2004 226 238
2. S. Akyalcin Are digital models replacing plaster casts? Dentistry 1 2011 e102
3. P.S. Fleming, V. Marinho, and A. Johal Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review Orthod Craniofac Res 14 2011 1 16
4. R.W. Goonewardene, M.S. Goonewardene, J.M. Razza, and K. Murray Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models Aust Orthod J 24 2008 83 90
5. M.F. Leifert, M.M. Leifert, S.S. Efstratiadis, and T.J. Cangialosi Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 16.e1 16.e4
6. M.L. Quimby, K.W. Vig, R.G. Rashid, and A.R. Firestone The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models Angle Orthod 74 2004 298 303
7. S.R. Mullen, C.A. Martin, P. Ngan, and M. Gladwin Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 2007 346 352
8. D.R. Stevens, C. Flores-Mir, B. Nebbe, D.W. Raboud, G. Heo, and P.W. Major Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 794 803
9. H.M. Horton, J.R. Miller, P.R. Gaillard, and B.E. Larson Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models Angle Orthod 80 2010 254 261
10. A.P. Keating, J. Knox, R. Bibb, and A.I. Zhurov A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy J Orthod 35 2008 191 201
11. M. Santoro, S. Galkin, M. Teredesai, O. Nicolay, and T.J. Cangialosi Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 2003 101 105
12. J.J. Tomassetti, L.J. Taloumis, J.M. Denny, and J.R. Fischer Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method Angle Orthod 71 2001 351 357
13. P.E. Shrout, and J.L. Fleiss Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 86 1979 420 428
14. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Stat Methods Med Res 8 1999 135 160
15. G. Rankin, and M. Stokes Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses Clin Rehabil 12 1998 187 199
16. C.H. Kau, J. Littlefield, N. Rainy, J.T. Nguyen, and B. Creed Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's index Angle Orthod 80 2010 435 439
17. B. Creed, C.H. Kau, J.D. English, J.J. Xia, and R.P. Lee A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models Semin Orthod 17 2011 49 56
18. K.G. Lightheart, J.D. English, C.H. Kau, S. Akyalcin, H.I. Bussa, and K.R. McGrory Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141 2012 686 693
19. B. Tarazona, J.M. Llamas, R. Cibrian, J.L. Gandia, and V. Paredes A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method Eur J Orthod 35 2013 1 6
20. M. Redich, T. Weinstock, Y. Abed, S. Schneor, Y. Holdstein, and A. Fischer A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor Orthod Craniofac Res 11 2008 90 95
21. T.J. Park, S.H. Lee, and K.S. Lee A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model Korean J Orthod 42 2012 169 181
22. B. Al-Rawi, B. Hassan, B. Vandenberge, and R. Jacobs Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans J Oral Rehabil 37 2010 352 358
23. Z. Fourie, J. Damstra, R.H. Schepers, P.O. Gerrits, and Y. Ren Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography Eur J Radiol 81 2012 e524 e530
24. D. Maret, F. Molinier, J. Braga, O.A. Peters, N. Telmon, and J. Treil Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography J Dent Res 89 2010 1465 1469
25. B. Hassan, P. Couto Souza, R. Jacobs, S. de Azambuja Berti, and P. van der Stelt Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography Clin Oral Investig 14 2010 303 310
26. G. Torassian, C.H. Kau, J.D. English, J. Powers, H.I. Bussa, and A. Marie Salas-Lopez Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials Angle Orthod 80 2010 474 481
27. A.M.R. Cuperus, M.C. Harms, F.A. Rangel, E.M. Bronkhorst, J.G.J.H. Schols, and K.H. Breuning Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142 2012 308 313
28. R. Pauwels, J. Beinsberger, B. Collaert, C. Theodorakou, J. Rogers, A. Walker SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners Eur J Radiol 81 2012 267 271
29. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs J Am Dent Assoc 143 2012 899 902