Employee engagement for sustainable organizations: Keyword analysis using social network analysis and burst detection approach

Sustainability (United States)

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Kim, Woocheol ^a   Khan, Gohar Feroz ^b   Wood, Jacob ^c   Mahmood, Muhammad Tariq ^a  

^a Korea University of Technology and Education   (South Korea)

^b Keimyung University   (South Korea)

^c Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Burst detection; Employee engagement; Keyword analysis; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ALGORITHM; NETWORK ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; RECRUITMENT (EMPLOYMENT); SOCIAL NETWORK; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84982676381     PISSN: 19370695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8070631     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aninkan, D.O.; Oyewole, A.A. The influence of individual and organizational factors on employee engagement. Int. J. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 3, 1381-1392.
2. Florea, L.; Cheung, Y.H.; Herndon, N.C. For all good reasons: Role of values in organizational sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 114, 393-408.
3. Spreitzer, G.; Porath, C.L.; Gibson, C.B. Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organ. Dyn. Q. Rev. Organ. Behav. Prof. Manag. 2012, 41, 155-162.
4. Knut Haanaes, M.R.; von Velken, I.; Audretsch, M.; Kiron, D.; Kruschwitz, N. Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2012, 53, 69.
5. Hart, S.L.; Milstein, M.B. Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manag. Exec. 2003, 17, 56-67.
6. Kleinberg, J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2003, 7, 373-397.
7. Carasco-Saul, M.; Kim, W.; Kim, T. Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2014, 14, 38-63.
8. Lee, Y.; Kwon, K.; Kim,W.; Cho, D.Work engagement and career: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2016, 15, 29-54.
9. Mirvis, P. Employee engagement and CSR: Transactional, relational, and developmental approaches. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2012, 54, 93-117.
10. Kahn, W.A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 1990, 33, 692-724.
11. Schaufeli,W.B.; Salanova, M.; González-romá, V.; Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002, 3, 71-92.
12. Kim, W.; Kolb, J.A.; Kim, T. The relationship between work engagement and performance: A review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2013, 12, 248-276.
13. Shuck, B. Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2011, 10, 304-328.
14. Haanaes, K.; Balagopal, B.; Arthur, D.; Kong, M.T.; Velken, I.; Kruschwitz, N.; Hopkins, M.S. First look: The second annual sustainability & innovation survey. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2011, 55, 77.
15. Kim, W. Introduction. In Creating Engaged Employees: It's Worth the Investment; Rothwell, W.J., Ed.; American Society for Training and Development: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2014; pp. 1-12.
16. Harter, J.K.; Schmidt, F.L.; Hayes, T.L. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 268.
17. Macey, W.H.; Schneider, B. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2008, 1, 3-30.
18. May, D.R.; Gilson, R.L.; Harter, L.M. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2004, 77, 11-37.
19. Reuters, T. Web of Science (Wos) Database. Available online: http://thomsonreuters.com/en/productsservices/ scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/web-of-science.html (accessed on 30 June 2016).
20. van Eck, N.; Waltman, L. Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2009, 84, 523-538.
21. Choi, J.; Yi, S.; Lee, K.C. Analysis of keyword networks in mis research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Inf. Manag. 2011, 48, 371-381.
22. Yoon, B.; Park, Y. A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2005, 72, 145-160.
23. Sci2Team. Science of Science (Sci2) Tooi Indiana University and Scitech Strategies. Available online: http://sci2.cns.iu.edu (accessed on 20 May 2016).
24. Leydesdorff, L. The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated; Universal-Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.
25. Cattell, J.M. A statistical study of american men of science. II. The measurement of scientific merit. Science 1906, 24, 699-707.
26. Garfield, E. Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 35, 1123-1127.
27. Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. Am. Doc. 1963, 14, 195-201.
28. Price, D. Statistical studies of networks of scientific papers. In Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation: Symposium Proceedings; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1965.
29. Cross, R.; Parker, A.; Prusak, L.; Borgatti, S. Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organ. Dyn. 2001, 30, 100-120.
30. Polites, G.; Watson, R. Using social network analysis to analyze relationships among IS journals. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2009, 10, 595-636.
31. Acedo, F.J.; Barroso, C.; Casanueva, C.; Calán, J.L. Co-Authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. J. Manag. Stud. 2006, 43, 957-983.
32. Khan, G.F.; Wood, J. Information technology management domain: Emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 959-972.
33. Pereira, C.S.; Soares, A.L. Improving the quality of collaboration requirements for information management through social networks analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2007, 27, 86-103.
34. Willging, P.A. Using social network analysis techniques to examine online interactions. US-China Educ. Rev. 2005, 2, 46-56.
35. Mali, F.; Kronegger, L.; Ferligoj, A. Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian sociological community. Corvinus J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 2010, 1, 29-50.
36. Wood, J.; Khan, G.F. International trade negotiation analysis: Network and semantic knowledge infrastructure. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 537-556.
37. Christensen, K.; Krontalis, A.K.; Ormrod, R.P. Patterns and regularities in the european marketing academic community. In Proceedings of the 2011 Emac Conference, Ljubliana, Slovenia, 24-27 May 2011; European Marketing Academy-EMAC: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
38. Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev. Int. 2008, 13, 209-223.
39. Besieux, T.; Baillien, E.; Verbeke, A.L.; Euwema, M.C. What goes around comes around: The mediation of corporate social responsibility in the relationship between transformational leadership and employee engagement. Econ. Ind. Democr. 2015.
40. Caesens, G.; Stinglhamber, F.; Luypaert, G. The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being: The role of work-related social support. Career Dev. Int. 2014, 19, 813-835.
41. Shimazu, A.; Schaufeli,W.B.; Kamiyama, K.; Kawakami, N.Workaholism vs. Work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2015, 22, 18-23.
42. Hu, Q.; Schaufeli, W.; Taris, T.; Hessen, D.; Hakanen, J.; Salanova, M.; Shimazu, A. East is east and west is west and never the twain shall meet: Work engagement and workaholism across eastern and western cultures. J. Behav. Soc. Sci. 2014, 1, 6-24.
43. Seppälä, P.; Hakanen, J.; Mauno, S.; Perhoniemi, R.; Tolvanen, A.; Schaufeli,W. Stability and change model of job resources and work engagement: A seven-year three-wave follow-up study. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2015, 24, 360-375.
44. Barnett, M.L. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 794-816.
45. Orlitzky, M.; Schmidt, F.L.; Rynes, S.L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 2003, 24, 403-441.
46. Yu, Y.; Choi, Y. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. Soc. Sci. J. 2014, 53, 226-235.
47. Casey, D.; Sieber, S. Employees, sustainability and motivation: Increasing employee engagement by addressing sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Res. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 6, 69-76.
48. Sharp, Z.; Zaidman, N. Strategization of CSR. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 93, 51-71.
49. Costa, P.L.; Passos, A.M.; Bakker, A.B. Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 2015, 8, 211-227.
50. Wollard, K.K.; Shuck, B. Antecedents to employee engagement a structured review of the literature. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 2011, 13, 429-446.
51. Julia Claxton, D.; Ferreira, P.; Real de Oliveira, E. Does corporate social responsibility impact on employee engagement? J. Workplace Learn. 2014, 26, 232-247.
52. Aguilera, R.V.; Rupp, D.E.; Williams, C.A.; Ganapathi, J. Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 836-863.
53. Tziner, A. Corporative social responsibility (csr) activities in the workplace: A comment on aguinis and glavas (2013). J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2013, 29, 91-93.
54. Maslach, C.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Leiter, M.P. Job burnout. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 397-422.
55. Cole, M.S.;Walter, F.; Bedeian, A.G.; O'Boyle, E.H. Job burnout and employee engagement a meta-analytic examination of construct proliferation. J. Manag. 2012, 38, 1550-1581.