International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 537-556

  Wood, Jacob ^a   Khan, Gohar Feroz ^a  

^a Korea University of Technology and Education   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Authors network; Emerging themes; International trade research; Network and semantic knowledge infrastructure; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942982426     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1651-1     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies,43, 957–983.
2. Adar, E. (2006). GUESS: A language and interface for graph exploration. CHI. http://graphexploration.cond.org/
3. Ahn, Y. H. (2002). Domestic institution and politics of international negotiation: Analysis on agricultural negotiation under the two-level game. Asian Research,45, 167–189. (in Korean).
4. Ahn, S. H., & Kim, J. (2007). A political economic analysis of free trade agreements: Temporal and distribution effects. Korea Development Institute.
5. Baldwin, R. E. (1996). The Poltical economy of trade policy: Integrating the perspectives of economists and political scientists. In R. C. Feenstra, B. M. Grossman & D. A. Irwin (Eds.), Political Economy of Trade Policy: Paper in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati (pp. 147–173). Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science,286, 509–512.
7. Barabási, A.-L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,311, 590–614.
8. Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9. Capling, A., & Low, P. (2010). Government, non-state actors and trade policy making. Negotiating preferentially or multilaterally. New York: CUP.
10. Cattell, J. M. (1906). A statistical study of American men of science. II. The measurement of scientific merit. Science,24, 699–707.
11. Chakraborty, D., & Mukherjee, S. (2013). How do trade and investment flows affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from panel data. Environmental Development,6, 34–47.
12. Chen, C. (2006). Citespace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology,57, 359–377.
13. Chen, H. (2009). A literature review on the relationship between foreign trade and economic growth. International Journal of Economic and Finance,1, 127–130.
14. Chen, C., Chen, Y., Horowitz, M., Hou, H., Liu, Z., & Pellegrino, D. (2009). Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery. Journal of Informetrics,3, 191–209.
15. Choi, J., Yi, S., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Information & Management,48, 371–381.
16. Congcong, W. (2010a). A social network analysis of international trade of copper ore. 2010 International conference on future information technology and management engineering (FITME) (pp. 464–467). 9–10 Oct 2010.
17. Congcong, W. (2010b). A social network analysis of international wheat trade. 2010 International conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering (ICIII) (pp. 413–416). 26–28 Nov 2010.
18. Cooper, W., & Manyin, M. (2011). The US–South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Looking ahead—Prospects and potential challenges. International Journal of Korean Studies, 15, 127–150.
19. Copeland, B., & Taylor, M. S. (2005). Free trade and global warming: A trade theory view of the Kyoto protocol. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,49, 205–234.
20. Davis, C. L. (2004). International institutions and issue linkage: Building support for agricultural trade liberalization. American Political Science Review,98, 153–169.
21. Davis, C. L. (2005). Food fights over free trade: How international institutions promote agricultural trade liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (2000). Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987–1997. Scientometrics,47, 55–73.
23. Dur, A., & De Bievre, D. (2008). The question of interest group influence. Opening EU-governance to civil society gains and challenges. Mannheim: Connex.
24. Dutt, P., & Mitra, D. (2005). Political ideology and endogenous trade policy: An empirical investigation. Review of Economic and Statistics,87, 59–72.
25. Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K., & Putnam, R. D. (1993). Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. Oakland: University of California Press.
26. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through Association of Ideas Science. Science,122, 108–111.
27. Garriaga, A. C. (2009). Regime type and bilateral treaty formation: Do too many cooks spoil the soup? The Journal of Conflict Resolution,53, 698–726.
28. Goldberg, P., & Maggi, G. (1999). Protection for sale: An empirical investigation. Amercian Economic Review,89, 1135–1155.
29. Griswold, G. (2010). Unions, protectionism, and U.S competitiveness. Cato Journal,30, 191–196.
30. Guo, H., Weingart, S., & Borner, K. (2011). Mixed-indicators model for identfying emerging research areas. Scientometrics,89, 421–435.
31. Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International Organization,63, 559–592.
32. Hamulic, I., & Bijedic, N. (2009). Social network analysis in virtual learning community at faculty of information technologies (fit), Mostar. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences,1, 2269–2273.
33. Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
34. Harris, R., & Li, Q. C. (2005). Review of the literature: The role of international trade and investment in business growth and development. UKTI 05/01, 1–95.
35. Hug, S. (2009). Models of multilateral negotiations and ratification. Department of Political Science, University of Geneve.
36. Hwang, C. H. (2011). Analysis of negotiation with the theoretical game model and its implications. Social Research,21, 95–120.
37. Hwang, G. S., & Lee, I. W. (2009). Analysis of Korea–US beef negotiation under the two-level game model. The Korea Association for Policy Analysis and Evaluation,19, 153–179.
38. Ishikawa, J., & Kiyono, K. (2006). Greenhouse-gas emission controls in an open economy. International Economic Review,47, 431–450.
39. Ishikawa, J., & Okubo, T. (2008). Greenhouse-gas emission controls and international carbon leakage through trade liberalization. Hitotsubashi COE/RES Conference on International Trade and FDI.
40. Kandogan, Y. (2014). The effect of foreign trade and investment liberalization on spatial concentration of economic activity. International Business Review,23, 648–659.
41. Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2013). International collaboration within electronic government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the Regional, Country, and Institutional levels. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 182–193.
42. Kim, S., & Shin, E. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: A social network approach. Special Forces,81, 445–471.
43. Kinsella, D. T. (2004). Mapping the small arms trade: Insights from social network analysis. Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations (Paper 21).
44. Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,7, 373–397.
45. Komolavanji, S., Jeenamunta, C., Ammarapala, V., & Chongphaisal, P. (2008). Thailand regional free trade agreements and the effect of industrial clustering. The formation of industrial clusters in Asia and regional integration. IDE.
46. Krystallis, A., Ormond, R., & Christensen, K. V. (2011). Patterns and regularities in the European marketing academic community: A social network analysis of the EMAC annual conferences 2000–2010. In Proceedings of the 2011 EMAC conference. Ljubliana, Slovenia.
47. Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. The Journal of Political Economy,108, 632–662.
48. Lesser, E., & Prusak, L. (2004). Creating value with knowledge: Insights from the IBM Institute for business value. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers.
50. Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy,42, 1515–1530.
51. Liesch, P., Håkanson, L., McGaughey, S., Middleton, S., & Cretchley, J. (2011). The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics,88, 17–42.
52. Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management,41, 1462–1480.
53. Ma, J., & Lu, Y. (2011). Free trade or protection: A literature review on trade barriers. Research in World Economy,2, 69–76.
54. Mahutga, M. C. (2006). The persistence of structural inequality? A network analysis of international trade, 1965–2000. Social Forces,84, 1863–1889.
55. Mail, F., Kronegger, L., & Ferligo, A. (2010). Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian Sociological Community. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,1, 29–50.
56. Mane, K., & Borner, K. (2004). Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americas (PNAS), 101, 5287–5290.
57. Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (2012). Votes, vetoes, and the political economy of international trade agreements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58. Marsden, P. V. (2008). Network data and measurement. London: Sage.
59. Milner, H. V., & Judkins, B. (2004). Partisanship, trade policy and globalization: Is there a left–right divide on trade policy? International Studies Quarterly,48, 95–120.
60. Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review,69, 213–238.
61. Morel, C. M., Serruya, S. J., Penna, G. O., & Guimar E. S. (2009). Co-authorship network analysis: A powerful tool for strategic planning of research, development and capacity building programs on neglected diseases. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 3, 99–107.
62. Nooy, W. D., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Structural analysis in the social sciences (Vol. 27). New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Oh, C. H., Travis Selmier, W., & Lien, D. (2011). International trade, foreign direct investment, and transaction costs in languages. The Journal of Socio-Economics,40, 732–735.
64. Pahre, R. (1997). Endogenous domestic institutions in two-level games and parliamentary oversight of the European Union. Journal of Conflict Resolution,41, 147–174.
65. Pahre, R. (2001). Divided government and international cooperation in Austria–Hungary, Sweden–Norway and the European Union. European Union Politics,2, 131–162.
66. Pahre, R. (2006). Democratic foreign policy making: Problems of divided government and international cooperation. Palgrave: MacMillan.
67. Price, D. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science,149, 510–515.
68. Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization,42, 427–460.
69. 2 emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Economic Review,28, 123–134.
70. Roy, P., Martínez, A. J., Miscione, G., Zuidgeest, M. H. P., & van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2012). Using social network analysis to profile people based on their e-communication and travel balance. Journal of Transport Geography,24, 111–122.
71. Santa-Cruz, A. (1997). Domestic politics and international negotiations: NAFTA’s two-level games. Journal of International and Area Studies,4, 1–16.
72. Sarigol, E., Pfitzner, R., Scholtes, I., Garas, A., & Scheitzer, F. (2014). Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks. Working paper to appear in EPJ Data Science.
73. Sci2team. (2009). Science of science (Sci2) TooI Indiana University and SciTech strategies. http://sci2.cns.iu.edu.
74. Sen, S. (2010). International trade theory and policy: A review of the literature. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, working paper no. 635.
75. Smith, M., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., & Leskovec, J. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010. The Social Media Research Foundation.
76. Smith, D. A., & White, D. R. (1992). Structure and dynamics of the global economy: Network analysis of international trade 1965–1980. Social Forces,70, 857–893.
77. Sofia Pereira, C., & Soares, A. L. (2007). Improving the quality of collaboration requirements for information management through social networks analysis. International Journal of Information Management,27, 86–103.
78. Tsay, M.-Y., Xu, H., & Wu, C.-W. (2003). Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. Scientometrics,57, 7–25.
79. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84, 523–538.
80. Vidgen, R., Henneberg, S., & Naude, P. (2007). What sort of community is the European Conference on Information Systems? A social network analysis 1993–2005. European Journal of Information Systems,16, 5–19.
81. Vymětal, D., & Šperka, R. (2014). MAREA—from an agent simulation application to the social network analysis. Procedia Computer Science,35, 1416–1425.
82. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature,393, 440–442.
84. Willging, P. A. (2009). Using social network analysis techniques to examine online interactions. US-China Education Review, 2(9), 46–56.
85. Williams, B. R., Manyin, M. E., Jurenas, R., & Platzer, M. D. (2014). The U.S.–South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and implementation. Congressional Research Service Reports, 1–50.
86. Worrell, J., Wasko, M., & Johnston, A. (2013). Social network analysis in accounting information systems research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems,14, 127–137.
87. WTO. (2011). World trade report. World Trade Organization.
88. Yi, S., & Choi, J. (2012). The organization of scientific knowledge: The structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics,90, 1015–1026.
89. Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2005). A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,72, 145–160.