Process evaluation for complex interventions in health services research: Analysing context, text trajectories and disruptions

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Murdoch, Jamie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex health interventions; Context; Linguistic ethnography; Process evaluation; Randomised controlled trials

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MANPOWER; NURSE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TELEPHONE;

ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; NURSES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TELEPHONE; TRIAGE;

EID: 84982273749     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1651-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ioannidis JP. Clinical trials: what a waste. BMJ. 2014;349:g7089.
2. Antes G, Chalmers I. Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical. Lancet. 2003;361(9362):978-9.
3. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. London: MRC Population Health Science Research Network; 2014.
4. Moran-Ellis J, Alexander VV, Cronin A, Dickinson M, Fielding J, Sleney J, et al. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qual Res. 2006;6:45-59.
5. Smith J, Hershusius L. Closing down the conversation: the End of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational enquirers. Educ Res. 1986;15:4-12.
6. Duranti A, Goodwin C. Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (No. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
7. Auer P, Di Luzio A. The contextualization of language (Vol. 22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing; 1992.
8. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman; 1995.
9. Hymes D. Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality. London: Taylor & Francis; 1996.
10. Atkinson JM, Heritage J. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
11. Wells M, Williams B, Treweek S, Coyle J, Taylor J. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials. 2012;13(1):95-111.
12. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581-629.
13. Star SL, Griesemer JR. Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci. 1989;19(3):387-420.
14. Katz E, Levin ML, Hamilton H. Traditions of research on the diffusion of innovation. Am Sociol Rev. 1963;1:237-52.
15. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T, Gold L. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(9):788-93.
16. Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. New York: Routledge; 2013.
17. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester; 2004.
18. Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2299-306.
19. Fabian J. Time and the other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press; 1983.
20. Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework - a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence based practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19(4):297-304.
21. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.
22. Rampton BK, Tusting K, Maybin J, Barwell R, Creese A, Lytra V. UK linguistic ethnography: a discussion paper. 2004. http://www.lingethnog.org/docs/rampton-et-al-2004-uk-linguistic-ethnography-a-discussion-paper/. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.
23. Sealey A. Linguistic ethnography in realist perspective1. J Socioling. 2007;11(5):641-60.
24. Blommaert J. Discourse: Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
25. Blommaert J. Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2013.
26. Woydack J, Rampton B. Text trajectories in a multilingual call centre: The linguistic ethnography of a calling script. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies. 2015; Paper 147.
27. Kell C. Inequalities and crossings: literacy and the spaces-in-between. Int J Educ Develop. 2011;31(6):606-13.
28. Rueda R, Mehan H. Metacognition and passing: strategic interactions in the lives of students with learning disabilities. Anthropol Educ Q. 1986;17(3):145-65.
29. Harris R, Rampton B. Ethnicities without guarantees: an empirical approach. In: Wetherell M, editor. Identity in the 21st century: New trends in changing times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. p. 95-119.
30. Geertz C. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Readings in the philosophy of social science. 1994:213-31
31. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell; 1953.
32. Dixon-Woods MA, Bosk CL, Aveling EL, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q. 2011;89(2):167-205.
33. Murdoch J, Salter C, Cross J, Poland F. Misunderstandings, communicative expectations and resources in illness narratives: Insights from beyond interview transcripts. Commun Med. 2013;10(2):153-63.
34. Murdoch J, Salter C, Poland F, Cross J. Challenging social cognition models of adherence: cycles of discourse, historical bodies, and interactional order. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(2):283-94.
35. Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt TA, Lattimer V, Richards DA, Richards SH, Salisbury C, Calitri R, Bowyer V, Chaplin K, Kandiyali R, Murdoch J, Roscoe J, Varley A, Warren FC, Taylor RS. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859-68.
36. Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt T, Lattimer V, Richards SH, Richards DA, Salisbury C, Taylor RS, Calitri R, Bowyer V, Chaplin K, Kandiyali R, Murdoch J, Price L, Roscoe J, Varley A, Warren F. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage for managing same-day consultation requests in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing nurse-led and GP-led management systems with usual care, (The ESTEEM trial). Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:13.
37. Murdoch J, Varley A, Fletcher E, Britten N, Price L, Calitri R, Green C, Lattimer V, Richards SH, Richards DA, Salisbury C. Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):1.
38. Murdoch J, Barnes R, Pooler J, Lattimer V, Fletcher E, Campbell JL. The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences. Soc Sci Med. 2015;126:36-47.
39. Murdoch J, Barnes R, Pooler J, Lattimer V, Fletcher E, Campbell JL. Question design in nurse-led and GP-led telephone triage for same-day appointment requests: a comparative investigation. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3):e004515.
40. May C, Finch T, Mair F, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Eccles M, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:148.
41. Haynes A, Brennan S, Redman S, Williamson A, Gallego G, Butow P. Figuring out fidelity: a worked example of the methods used to identify, critique and revise the essential elements of a contextualised intervention in health policy agencies. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):1-18.
42. Mitchell CJ. Typicality and the case study. In: Ellen, PF, editor. Ethnographic research: a guide to general conduct. New York: Academic; 1984. p. 238-41.
43. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3-4):267-76.
44. Engeström Y. "Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice." Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. 1993: 64-103
45. Heritage J. Conversation analysis as an approach to the medical encounter. In: McKinlay JB, Marceau L, editors. 2009. e-Source: Behavioral and Social Science Research Interactive Textbook. Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research. http://www.esourceresearch.org/eSourceBook/ConversationAnalysis/4CAandtheMedicalEncounter/tabid/512/Default.aspx. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.
46. Lawson T. Economics and reality. London: Routledge; 1997.
47. Bunce AE, Gold R, Davis JV, McMullen CK, Jaworski V, Mercer M, Nelson C. Ethnographic process evaluation in primary care: explaining the complexity of implementation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):607.
48. Weiss CH. Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Concepts Methods Contexts. 1995;1:65-92.
49. Palareti L, Berti C. Different ecological perspectives for evaluating residential care outcomes: Which window for the black box? Children Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31:1080-5.