Hemicellulose-reinforced nanocellulose hydrogels for wound healing application

Cellulose

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 3129-3143

  Liu, Jun ^a   Chinga Carrasco, Gary ^b   Cheng, Fang ^c,d   Xu, Wenyang ^a   Willför, Stefan ^a   Syverud, Kristin ^b,e   Xu, Chunlin ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b Papir og fiberinstituttet AS   (Norway)

^c ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^e NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

All polysaccharide composites; Cell behavior; Hemicelluloses; Hydrogel; Mechanical strength; Nanofibrillated cellulose; Reinforcing; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; CELLULOSE; CYTOLOGY; REINFORCEMENT; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

CELL BEHAVIORS; HEMICELLULOSES; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; REINFORCING; WOUND HEALING;

HYDROGELS;

EID: 84981266432     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-1038-3     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alexandrescu L, Syverud K, Gatti A, Chinga-Carrasco G (2013) Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose 20:1765–1775. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9948-9
2. Andrijevic L, Radotic K, Bogdanovic J, Mutavdzic D, Bogdanovic G (2008) Antiproliferative effect of synthetic lignin against human breast cancer and normal fetal lung cell lines. Potency of low molecular weight fractions. J BUON 13:241–244
3. Balakrishnan B, Banerjee R (2011) Biopolymer-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Chem Rev 111:4453–4474. doi:10.1021/cr100123h
4. Barbucci R (2009) Hydrogels: biological properties and applications. Springer, Milan
5. Bhattacharya M et al (2012) Nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel promotes three-dimensional liver cell culture. J Controll Release 164:291–298. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.06.039
6. Bodin A, Ahrenstedt L, Fink H, Brumer H, Risberg B, Gatenholm P (2007) Modification of nanocellulose with a xyloglucan-RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: implications for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 8:3697–3704. doi:10.1021/bm070343q
7. Bonilla MR, Lopez-Sanchez P, Gidley MJ, Stokes JR (2015) Micromechanical model of biphasic biomaterials with internal adhesion: application to nanocellulose hydrogel composites. Acta Biomater. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.032
8. Borges AC et al (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose composite hydrogel for the replacement of the nucleus pulposus. Acta Biomater 7:3412–3421. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.029
9. Cartmell SH, Thurstan S, Gittings JP, Griffiths S, Bowen CR, Turner IG (2014) Polarization of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds: influence on osteoblast cell proliferation and extracellular matrix production. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 102:1047–1052. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34790
10. Chang H-I, Wang Y (2011) Cell responses to surface and architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Daniel E (ed) Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering—cells and biomaterials. InTech, Croatla. doi:10.5772/21983
11. Chinga-Carrasco G, Syverud K (2014) Pretreatment-dependent surface chemistry of wood nanocellulose for pH-sensitive hydrogels. J Biomater Appl 29:423–432. doi:10.1177/0885328214531511
12. Chinga-Carrasco G, Averianova N, Kondalenko O, Garaeva M, Petrov V, Leinsvang B, Karlsen T (2014) The effect of residual fibres on the micro-topography of cellulose nanopaper. Micron 56:80–84. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2013.09.002
13. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM Jr (2007) The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8:1–12. doi:10.1021/bm060620d
14. Eckardt NA (2008) Role of xyloglucan in primary cell walls. Plant Cell 20:1421–1422. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.061382
15. Eisenbarth E, Meyle J, Nachtigall W, Breme J (1996) Influence of the surface structure of titanium materials on the adhesion of fibroblasts. Biomaterials 17:1399–1403
16. Eronen P, Osterberg M, Heikkinen S, Tenkanen M, Laine J (2011a) Interactions of structurally different hemicelluloses with nanofibrillar cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 86:1281–1290. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.031
17. Eronen P, Österberg M, Heikkinen S, Tenkanen M, Laine J (2011b) Interactions of structurally different hemicelluloses with nanofibrillar cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 86:1281–1290. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.031
18. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10:162–165. doi:10.1021/bm801065u
19. George JT, Howard G (1963) Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J Cell Biol 17:15. doi:10.1083/jcb.17.2.299
20. Goldschmid O (1954) Determination of phenolic hydroxyl content of lignin preparations by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Anal Chem 26:1421–1423
21. Holback H, Yeo Y, Park K (2011) Hydrogel swelling behavior and its biomedical applications. In: Rimmer S (ed) Biomedical hydrogels. Woodhead Publishing, UK, pp 3–24
22. Hua K, Carlsson DO, Ålander E, Lindström T, Strømme M, Mihranyan A, Ferraz N (2014) Translational study between structure and biological response of nanocellulose from wood and green algae. RSC Adv 4:2892–2903. doi:10.1039/c3ra45553j
23. Itoh S, Nakamura S, Nakamura M, Shinomiya K, Yamashita K (2006) Enhanced bone ingrowth into hydroxyapatite with interconnected pores by Electrical Polarization. Biomaterials 27:5572–5579. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.007
24. Janmey PA, Miller RT (2011) Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease. J Cell Sci 124:9–18. doi:10.1242/jcs.071001
25. Johansson P et al (2004) Crystal structures of a poplar xyloglucan endotransglycosylase reveal details of transglycosylation acceptor binding. Plant cell 16:874–886. doi:10.1105/tpc.020065
26. Kabel MA, van den Borne H, Vincken JP, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA (2007) Structural differences of xylans affect their interaction with cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 69:94–105
27. Karaaslan MA, Tshabalala MA, Yelle DJ, Buschle-Diller G (2011) Nanoreinforced biocompatible hydrogels from wood hemicelluloses and cellulose whiskers. Carbohydr Polym 86:192–201. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.030
28. Kilpeläinen P, Kitunen V, Pranovich A, Ilvesniemi H, Willfor S (2013) Pressurized Hot Water Flow-through Extraction of Birch Sawdust with Acetate pH Buffer. Bioresources 8:5202–5218
29. Lin S, Sangaj N, Razafiarison T, Zhang C, Varghese S (2011) Influence of physical properties of biomaterials on cellular behavior. Pharm Res 28:1422–1430. doi:10.1007/s11095-011-0378-9
30. Linder A, Bergman R, Bodin A, Gatenholm P (2003) Mechanism of assembly of xylan onto cellulose surfaces. Langmuir ACS J Surf Colloids 19:5072–5077
31. Liu J, Korpinen R, Mikkonen K, Willför S, Xu C (2014) Nanofibrillated cellulose originated from birch sawdust after sequential extractions: a promising polymeric material from waste to films. Cellulose 21:2587–2598. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0321-4
32. Liu J, Willför S, Xu C (2015) A review of bioactive plant polysaccharides: biological activities, functionalization, and biomedical applications. Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre 5:31–61
33. Liu J et al (2016) Development of nanocellulose scaffolds with tunable structures to support 3D cell culture. Carbohydr Polym 148:259–271
34. Lopez-Sanchez P, Cersosimo J, Wang D, Flanagan B, Stokes JR, Gidley MJ (2015) Poroelastic mechanical effects of hemicelluloses on cellulosic hydrogels under compression. PLOS One 10:e0122132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122132
35. Lucenius J, Parikka K, Österberg M (2014) Nanocomposite films based on cellulose nanofibrils and water-soluble polysaccharides. React Funct Polym 85:167–174. doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.08.001
36. Malinen MM, Kanninen LK, Corlu A, Isoniemi HM, Lou Y-R, Yliperttula ML, Urtti AO (2014) Differentiation of liver progenitor cell line to functional organotypic cultures in 3D nanofibrillar cellulose and hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels. Biomaterials 35:5110–5121. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.020
37. Martinez-Ruvalcaba A (2008) Swelling characterization and drug delivery kinetics of polyacrylamide-co-itaconic acid/chitosan hydrogels eXPRESS. Polym Lett 3:25–32. doi:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.5
38. Mehling T, Smirnova I, Guenther U, Neubert RHH (2009) Polysaccharide-based aerogels as drug carriers. J Non-Cryst Solids 355:2472–2479. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.08.038
39. Mertaniemi H et al (2016) Human stem cell decorated nanocellulose threads for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 82:208–220. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.020
40. Moroni L, de Wijn JR, van Blitterswijk CA (2006) 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Biomaterials 27:974–985. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.023
41. Muiznieks LD, Keeley FW (2013) Molecular assembly and mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix: a fibrous protein perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta 1832:866–875. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.022
42. Okay O (2010) General properties of hydrogels. In: Gerlach G, Arndt K-F (eds) Hydrogel sensors and actuators, vol vol 6., Springer Series on Chemical Sensors and BiosensorsSpringer, Heidelberg, pp 1–14. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75645-3_1
43. Park YB, Cosgrove DJ (2015) Xyloglucan and its interactions with other components of the growing cell wall. Plant Cell Physiol 56:180–194
44. Pereira MM et al (2013) Cytotoxicity and expression of genes involved in the cellular stress response and apoptosis in mammalian fibroblast exposed to cotton cellulose nanofibers. Nanotechnology 24
45. Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1277–1286. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y
46. Plant AL, Bhadriraju K, Spurlin TA, Elliott JT (2009) Cell response to matrix mechanics: focus on collagen. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)—Mol Cell Res 1793:893–902. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.012
47. Popa V (2011) Polysaccharides in medicinal and pharmaceutical applications. Smithers Rapra, Shrewsbury
48. Portal O, Clark WA, Levinson DJ (2009) Microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of nonhealing lower extremity ulcers. Wounds 21:1–3
49. Powell LC, Khan S, Chinga-Carrasco G, Wright CJ, Hill KE, Thomas DW (2016) An investigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth on novel nanocellulose fibre dressings. Carbohydr Polym 137:191–197. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.024
50. Prakobna K, Kisonen V, Xu C, Berglund L (2015) Strong reinforcing effects from galactoglucomannan hemicellulose on mechanical behavior of wet cellulose nanofiber gels. J Mater Sci 50:7413–7423. doi:10.1007/s10853-015-9299-z
51. Richards RG (1996) The effect of surface roughness on fibroblast adhesion in vitro. Injury 27(Suppl 3):SC38–43
52. Rimmer SD (2011) Biomedical hydrogels: biochemistry, manufacture and medical applications. Woodhead Pub, Oxford
53. Rosario P (2013) Advances in biomaterials science and biomedical applications. InTech. doi:10.5772/56420
54. Saddiq ZA, Barbenel JC, Grant MH (2009) The mechanical strength of collagen gels containing glycosaminoglycans and populated with fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 89A:697–706. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32007
55. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–1691. doi:10.1021/bm060154s
56. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2011) High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Compos Sci Technol 71:1593–1599. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.003
57. Simkovic I (2013) Unexplored possibilities of all-polysaccharide composites. Carbohydr Polym 95:697–715. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.040
58. Sorimachi K, Watanabe K, Yamazaki S, Yasumura Y (1992) Inhibition of fibroblast growth by polyanions; effects of dextran sulfate and lignin derivatives. Cell Biol Int Rep 16:63–71
59. Stevanic JS, Mikkonen KS, Xu CL, Tenkanen M, Berglund L, Salmen L (2014) Wood cell wall mimicking for composite films of spruce nanofibrillated cellulose with spruce galactoglucomannan and arabinoglucuronoxylan. J Mater Sci 49:5043–5055
60. Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Toledo J, Toledo PG (2011) A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 84:1033–1038. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.066
61. Syverud K, Pettersen S, Draget K, Chinga-Carrasco G (2014) Controlling the elastic modulus of cellulose nanofibril hydrogels—scaffolds with potential in tissue engineering. Cellulose 1–9 doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0470-5
62. Syverud K, Pettersen S, Draget K, Chinga-Carrasco G (2015) Controlling the elastic modulus of cellulose nanofibril hydrogels—scaffolds with potential in tissue engineering. Cellulose 22:473–481. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0470-5
63. Wells RG (2008) The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 47:1394–1400. doi:10.1002/hep.22193
64. Wells RG (2013) Tissue mechanics and fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1832:884–890. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.02.007
65. Willför S, Rehn P, Sundberg A, Sundberg K, Holmbom B (2003) Recovery of water-soluble acetylgalactoglucomannans from mechanical pulp of spruce. TAPPI J 2:27–32
66. Xu C, Leppanen AS, Eklund P, Holmlund P, Sjoholm R, Sundberg K, Willfor S (2010) Acetylation and characterization of spruce (Picea abies) galactoglucomannans. Carbohydr Res 345:810–816. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2010.01.007
67. Xu C, Spadiut O, Araújo AC, Nakhai A, Brumer H (2012) Chemo-enzymatic assembly of clickable cellulose surfaces via multivalent polysaccharides. ChemSusChem 5:661–665. doi:10.1002/cssc.201100522
68. Yang T, Malkoch M, Hult A (2013) Sequential interpenetrating poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels prepared by UV-initiated thiol–ene coupling chemistry. J Polym Sci, Part A Polym Chem 51:363–371. doi:10.1002/pola.26393