Pretreatment-dependent surface chemistry of wood nanocellulose for pH-sensitive hydrogels

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 423-432

  Chinga Carrasco, Gary ^a   Syverud, Kristin ^a  

^a Papir og fiberinstituttet AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

characterisation; cross linking; hydrogels; Nanocellulose; nanofibrillated cellulose; pH responsive; wound healing

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDES; ALKALINITY; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; HYDROGELS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; POROSITY; POROUS MATERIALS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

CHARACTERISATION; NANO-CELLULOSE; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; PH-RESPONSIVE; WOUND HEALING;

CELLULOSE;

ACID; ALDEHYDE; CALCIUM ION; CARBOXYL GROUP; CELLULOSE; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOPARTICLE; PERIODATE; POLYANION; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HYDROGEL; NANOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOFILM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HYDROGEL; IONIZATION; OXIDATION; PH; POLYMERIZATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN METHYLATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY; WOOD; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CELLULOSE; HYDROGELS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; WOOD;

EID: 84906703646     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328214531511     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, et al. Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 2006 ; 7 (6). 1687-1691
2. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, et al. The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir. 2008 ; 24 (3). 784-795
3. Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Toledo J, et al. A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym. 2010 ; 84 (3). 1033-1038
4. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E. Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym. 2010 ; 79 (4). 1086-1093
5. Alila S, Besbesa I, Rei Vilar M, et al. Non-woody plants as raw materials for production of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC): a comparative study. Ind Crops Prod. 2013 ; 41: 250-259
6. Taniguchi T, Okamura K. New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int. 1998 ; 47: 291-294
7. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, et al. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules. 2008 ; 9 (6). 1579-1585
8. Spence K, Venditti RA, Habibi Y, et al. The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. Bioresour Technol. 2010 ; 101: 5961-5968
9. Chinga-Carrasco G. Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: the morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011 ; 6: 417-417
10. Pääkkö M, Ankefors M, Kosonen H, et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules. 2007 ; 8 (6). 1934-1941
11. Chinga-Carrasco G, Yu Y, Diserud O. Quantitative electron microscopy of cellulose nanofibril structures from Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata kraft pulp fibres. Microsc Microanal. 2011 ; 17: 563-571
12. Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirviö J, et al. Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose strength through sequential periodate-chlorite oxidation. Biomacromolecules. 2012 ; 13: 1592-1597
13. Tejado A, Nur Alam Md, Antal M, et al. Energy requirements for the disintegration of cellulose fibers into cellulose nanofibers. Cellulose. 2012 ; 19: 831-842
14. Varma AJ, Kulkarni MP. Oxidation of cellulose under controlled conditions. Polym Degrad Stab. 2002 ; 77: 25-27
15. Syverud K, Kirsebom H, Hajizadeh S, et al. Cross-linking cellulose nanofibrils for potential elastic cryo-structured gels. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011 ; 6: 626-626
16. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, et al. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharmaceut Biopharm. 2000 ; 50: 27-46
17. Martinez-Ruvalcaba A, Sánchez-Díaz JC, Becerra F, et al. Swelling characterization and drug delivery kinetics of polyacrylamide-co- itaconic acid/chitosan hydrogels. eXPRESS Polym Lett. 2009 ; 3 (1). 25-32
18. Vartiainen J, Pöhler T, Sirola K, et al. Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose. 2011 ; 18: 775-786
19. Jong S, Hirani AA, Colacino KR, et al. Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of cellulose nanocrystals. Nano Life. 2012 ; 02: 1241006-1241006
20. Alexandrescu L, Syverud K, Gatti A, et al. Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose. 2013 ; 20: 1765-1775
21. Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, et al. Microbial cellulose - the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials. 2006 ; 27 (2). 145-151
22. Walecka JA. An investigation of low degree of substitution carboxymethylcellulose. TAPPI. 1956 ; 39 (7). 458-463
23. ISO 5263-1:2004. Pulps - laboratory wet disintegration, part 1: disintegration of chemical pulps.
24. Shet TR. Sulfonated cellulose and method of preparation. Patent 5,522,967, USA, 1996.
25. Sirvio J, Hyvakko U, Liimatainen H, et al. Periodate oxidation of cellulose at elevated temperatures using metal salts as cellulose activators. Carbohydr Polym. 2011 ; 83: 1293-1297
26. ISO 5351:2010. Pulps - determination of limiting viscosity number in cupri-ethylenediamine (CED) solution.
27. Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, et al. Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules. 2012 ; 13: 842-849
28. Saito T, Isogai A. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromolecules. 2004 ; 5: 1983-1989
29. Sihtola H, Kyrklund B, Laamanen L, et al. Comparison and conversion of viscosity and DP-values determined by different methods. Pap Puu. 1963 ; 4: 225-232
30. Chinga-Carrasco G, Averianova N, Kodalenko O, et al. The effect of residual fibres on the micro-topography of cellulose nanopaper. Micron. 2014 ; 56: 80-84
31. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, et al. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 2485-2491.
32. Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N, et al. Biomacromolecules 2009; 10: 1992-1996.
33. Chinga-Carrasco G, Kuznetsova N, Garaeva M, et al. Bleached and unbleached MFC nanobarriers - properties and hydrophobization with hexamethyldisilazane. J Nanoparticle Res. 2012 ; 14: 1280-1280
34. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H. The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules. 2008 ; 9: 1022-1026
35. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, et al. Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules. 2009 ; 10 (1). 162-165
36. Chinga-Carrasco G. Optical methods for the quantification of the fibrillation degree of bleached MFC materials. Micron. 2013 ; 48: 42-48
37. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A. Influence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril length on film properties. Carbohdr Polym. 2013 ; 93: 172-177
38. Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules. 2010 ; 11: 1696-1700
39. Rodionova G, Saito T, Lenes M, et al. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of Norway spruce and eucalyptus pulps: preparation and characterization of nanofibers and nanofiber dispersions. J Polym Environ. 2013 ; 21: 207-214
40. You J-O, Almeda D, Ye GJC, et al. Bioresponsive matrices in drug delivery. J Biol Eng. 2010 ; 4: 15-15
41. Pandey M, Amin MCIM, Ahmad N, et al. Rapid synthesis of superabsorbent smart-swelling bacterial cellulose/acrylamide-based hydrogels for drug delivery. Int J Polym Sci 2013; dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/905471.
42. Nussinovitch A. Bead formation, strengthening, and modification. In: Polymer macro- and micro-gel beads: fundamentals and applications, 2010, pp.27-52. Springer: New York.
43. Gethin G. The significance of surface pH in chronic wounds. Wounds UK. 2007 ; 3 (3). 52-56
44. Nagoba B, Wadher B, Kulkarni P, et al. Acetic acid treatment of pseudomonal wound infections. Eur J Gen Med. 2008 ; 5 (2). 104-106
45. Costa E, Lloyd MM, Chopko C, et al. Tuning smart microgel swelling and responsive behavior through strong and weak polyelectrolyte pair assembly. Langmuir. 2012 ; 28 (26). 10082-10090