The effect of surface roughness on fibroblast adhesion in vitro

Injury

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL.3, 1996, Pages

  Richards, R G ^a  

^a AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Back scattered electron imaging; Cells; Image analysis; Infection; Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; FIBROBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELLS, CULTURED; FIBROBLASTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0030339135     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(96)89031-0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Boxma H. Wound infections in fracture surgery. Thesis. University of Amsterdam. 1995.
2. Richards RG, ap Gwynn I, Bundy KJ and Rahn BA. Microjet impingement followed by scanning electron microscopy as a qualitative technique to compare cellular adhesion to various biomaterials. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 1995;12:1015-1024.
3. Weiss L. The measurement of cell adhesion. Exp.Cell Res. 1961;8:141-153.
4. Weiss L and Coombs RA. The demonstration of rupture of cell surfaces by an immunological technique. Exp.Cell Res. 1963;30:331-338.
5. Evans EA, Berk D and Leung A. Detachment of agglutinin bonded red blood cells. I - Forces to rupture molecular point attachments. Biophys. J. 1991;59:838-848.
6. Lotz, MM, Burdsal, CA, Erickson, HP and McClay, DR Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin : Quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response. J. Cell Biol. 1989; 109: 1795-1805.
7. Elvin P and Evans CW. The adhesiveness of normal and SV40 transformed Balb C/3T3 cells: Effects of culture density and shear rate. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 1982;18:669-675.
8. Richards RG, Rahn BA and ap Gwynn I. Scanning electron microscopy of the undersurface of cell monolayers grown on metallic implants. J. Mat. Sci.-Mat. in Med. 1995;6:120-124.
9. Richards RG, ap Gwynn I. Backscattered electron imaging of the undersurface of resin-embedded cells by field emission scanning electron microscopy. J. Microsc. 1995;177:43-52.
10. Könönen M, Hormia M, Kivilaahti J, Hautaniemi J and Thesleff I. Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium.. J.Biomed.Mat.Res. 1992;26,1325-1341.
11. Porter K, Prescott D and Frye J. Changes in surface morphology of CHO cells during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 1973;57,815-836.
12. Elvin P & Evans CW. Cell adhesiveness and the cell cycle. Correlation in synchronised BaIb/C 3T3 cells. Biol.Cell. 1983;48,1-10.
13. Reid G, Hawthorn LA, Eisen A and Beg HS. Adhesion of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis to polymer and urinary catheter surfaces. Colloids Surfaces. 1989;42,299-311.