Nanofibrillated cellulose composite hydrogel for the replacement of the nucleus pulposus

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3412-3421

  Borges, Ana C ^a   Eyholzer, Christian ^b,d   Duc, Fabien ^a   Bourban, Pierre Etienne ^a   Tingaut, Philippe ^b   Zimmermann, Tanja ^b   Pioletti, Dominique P ^c   Månson, Jan Anders E ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE TECHNOLOGIE DES COMPOSITES ET POLYMÈRES LTC   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

^d LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Composite hydrogel; Compression and shear properties; Nanofibrillated cellulose; Nucleus pulposus; Swelling behavior

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLULOSE; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; RESTORATION; SWELLING;

CELLULOSE COMPOSITES; COMPOSITE HYDROGELS; COMPRESSION AND SHEAR; COMPRESSION PROPERTIES; N-VINYL-2-PYRROLIDONE; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; SHEAR PROPERTIES; SWELLING BEHAVIOR; SWELLING MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; SWELLING RATIO;

HYDROGELS;

1 VINYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; CELLULOSE; NANOFIBER; POLYSORBATE 20;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FETUS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; HYDROGEL; IMPLANT; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SWELLING; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 79960972514     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.029     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Urban JPG, Roberts S. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther 2003;5(3):120-30. (Pubitemid 36849758)
2. Anderson DG, Tannoury C. Molecular pathogenic factors in symptomatic disc degeneration. The Spine J 2005;5(6 Suppl. 1):S260-6.
3. Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, Winterbottom N, Hollander AP, Poole RA, et al. The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest 1996;98(4):996-1003. (Pubitemid 26293318)
4. White III AA, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1990.
5. Bao QB, McCullen GM, Higham PA, Dumbleton JH, Yuan HA. The artificial disc: theory, design and materials. Biomaterials 1996;17(12):1157-67. (Pubitemid 26175592)
6. Ferguson SJ, Ito K, Nolte LP. Fluid flow and convective transport of solutes within the intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2004;37(2):213-21. (Pubitemid 38050052)
7. Ferguson SJ, Steffen T. Biomechanics of the aging spine. Eur Spine J 2003;12(Suppl. 2):S97-S103. (Pubitemid 37409927)
8. Bono CM, Garfin SR. History and evolution of disc replacement. Spine J 2004;4(6 Suppl.):145S-50S.
9. Lee CK, Goel VK. Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria. Spine J 2004;4(6 Suppl.):209S-18S.
10. Goins ML, Wimberley DW, Yuan PS, Fitzhenry LN, Vaccaro AR. Nucleus pulposus replacement: an emerging technology. Spine J 2005;5(6 Suppl.):317S-24S.
11. Mizuno H, Roy AK, Zaporojan V, Vacanti CA, Ueda M, Bonassar LJ. Biomechanical and biochemical characterization of composite tissueengineered intervertebral discs. Biomaterials 2006;27(3):362-70. (Pubitemid 41457239)
12. Galante JO. Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 1967(Suppl. 100):1-91.
13. Yu J, Winlove PC, Roberts S, Urban JP. Elastic fibre organization in the intervertebral discs of the bovine tail. J Anat 2002;201(6):465-75. (Pubitemid 35452734)
14. Rannou F, Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Poiraudeau S, Revel M. Disque intervertébral et structures voisines de la colonne lombaire: anatomie, biologie, physiologie et biomécanique [Anatomy, biology, physiology, and biomechanics of intervertebral disk and other anatomical structures of the lumbar spine]. EMC-Rhumatol-Orthop 2004;1(6):487-507. (Pubitemid 39646941)
15. Cloyd JM, Malhotra NR, Weng L, Chen W, Mauck RL, Elliott DM. Material properties in unconfined compression of human nucleus pulposus, injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Spine J 2007;16(11):1892-8. (Pubitemid 350105326)
16. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC. The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. J Biomech 1997;30(10):1005-13. (Pubitemid 27490229)
17. Bao QB, Yuan HA. Prosthetic disc replacement: the future? Clin Orthop Related Res 2002(394):139-45.
18. Joshi A, Fussell G, Thomas J, Hsuan A, Lowman A, Karduna A, et al. Functional compressive mechanics of a PVA/PVP nucleus pulposus replacement. Biomaterials 2006;27(2):176-84. (Pubitemid 41278518)
19. Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54(1):3-12. (Pubitemid 34081178)
20. Kopecek J. Hydrogels: from soft contact lenses and implants to self-assembled nanomaterials. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem 2009;47(22):5929-46.
21. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci: Appl Polym Symp 1983;37:815-27.
22. Lu J, Wang T, Drzal LT. Preparation and properties of microfibrillated cellulose polyvinyl alcohol composite materials. Comp Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 2008;39(5):738-46.
23. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, et al. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 2009;45(1):1-33.
24. Hubbe MA. Are lignocellulosic resources too valuable to burn? BioResources 2008;3(2):295-6.
25. Hubbe MA, Pawlak JJ, Koukoulas AA. Paper's appearance: a review. BioResources 2008;3(2):627-65.
26. Zimmermann T, Pöhler E, Geiger T. Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement. Adv Eng Mater 2004;6(9):754-61.
27. Krupa I, Nedelcev T, Racko D, Lacik I. Mechanical properties of silica hydrogels prepared and aged at physiological conditions: testing in the compression mode. J Sol - Gel Sci Technol 2010;53(1):107-14.
28. Pioletti DP, Rakotomanana LR. Non-linear viscoelastic laws for soft biological tissues. Eur J Mech, A/Solids 2000;19(5):749-59.
29. 2-TCP for use in vertebroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A 2006;78(3):629-37.
30. Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54(1):13-36. (Pubitemid 34075312)
31. Cavalieri F, Miano F, D'Antona P, Paradossi G. Study of gelling behavior of poly(vinyl alcohol)-methacrylate for potential utilizations in tissue replacement and drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 2004;5(6):2439-46. (Pubitemid 39585299)
32. van Dijk-Wolthuis WNE, Franssen O, Talsma H, Van Steenbergen MJ, Kettenesvan den Bosch JJ, Hennink WE. Synthesis, characterization, and polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate derivatized dextran. Macromolecules 1995;28:6317-22.
33. Liu Y, Chan-Park MB. Hydrogel based on interpenetrating polymer networks of dextran and gelatin for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009;30(2):196-207.
34. Fleury G, Schlatter G, Brochon C, Hadziioannou G. From high molecular weight precursor polyrotaxanes to supramolecular sliding networks. The 'sliding gels'. Polymer 2005;46(19 special issue):8494-501.
35. Carl A, Ledet E, Yuan H, Sharan A. New developments in nucleus pulposus replacement technology. Spine J 2004;4(6 Suppl.):325S-9S.
36. Lin-Gibson S, Jones RL, Washburn NR, Horkay F. Structure - property relationships of photopolymerizable poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate hydrogels. Macromolecules 2005;38(7):2897-902. (Pubitemid 40496783)
37. Gonen-Wadmany M, Oss-Ronen L, Seliktar D. Protein - polymer conjugates for forming photopolymerizable biomimetic hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007;28(26):3876-86. (Pubitemid 47048353)
38. Lee JH, Bucknall DG. Swelling behavior and network structure of hydrogels synthesized using controlled UV-initiated free radical polymerization. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 2008;46(14):1450-62.
39. Prasitsilp M, Siriwittayakorn T, Molloy R, Suebsanit N, Siriwittayakorn P, Veeranondha S. Cytotoxicity study of homopolymers and copolymers of 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate and some alkyl acrylates for potential use as temporary skin substitutes. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14(7):595-600. (Pubitemid 36851209)
40. van de Wetering P, Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek NME, van Steenbergen MJ, Crommelin DJA, Hennink WE. Copolymers of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate with ethoxytriethylene glycol methacrylate or N-vinylpyrrolidone as gene transfer agents. J Control Release 2000;64(1-3):193-203. (Pubitemid 30035319)
41. Furukawa H, Horie K, Nozaki R, Okada M. Swelling-induced modulation of static and dynamic fluctuations in polyacrylamide gels observed by scanning microscopic light scattering. Phys Rev E - Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2003;68(31):314061-3140614.
42. Tanaka Y, Gong JP, Osada Y. Novel hydrogels with excellent mechanical performance. Progr Polym Sci (Oxford) 2005;30(1):1-9. (Pubitemid 40220194)
43. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005;26(4):419-31. (Pubitemid 38951109)