Three-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography in a breath hold with sparsitybased reconstruction of highly undersampled data

Radiology

Volumn 280, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 585-594

  Chandarana, Hersh ^a   Doshi, Ankur M ^a   Shanbhogue, Alampady ^a   Babb, James S ^a   Bruno, Mary T ^a   Zhao, Tiejun ^b   Raithel, Esther ^c   Zenge, Michael O ^b   Li, Guobin ^d   Otazo, Ricardo ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Siemens HealthCare   (United States)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OUTPATIENT; PANCREAS CYST; PANCREATIC DUCT; PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SAMPLING PERFECTION WITH APPLICATION OPTIMIZED CONTRAST USING DIFFERENT FLIP ANGLE EVOLUTION ACQUISITION; SPARSITY BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL BREATH HOLD MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST; BILE DUCT; BREATH HOLDING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS DISEASE; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILE DUCTS; BREATH HOLDING; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84979937134     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151935     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancrea-tography compared with diagnostic endo-scopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess 2004;8(10):iii, 1-89.
2. O'Neill E, Hammond N, Miller FH. MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 2014;52(4):757-777.
3. Prabhakar PD, Prabhakar AM, Prabhakar HB, Sahani D. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of benign disorders of the biliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18(3):497-514, xi.
4. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. RadioGraphics 2000;20(4):939-957; quiz 1107-1108, 1112. [Published correction appears in RadioGraphics 2000;20(5):1494.]
5. Wong HP, Chiu YL, Shiu BH, Ho LC. Preop-erative MRCP to detect choledocholithiasis in acute calculous cholecystitis. J Hepatobili-ary Pancreat Sci 2012;19(4):458-464.
6. Ringe KI, Hartung D, von Falck C, Wacker F, Raatschen HJ. 3D-MRCP for evaluation of intra-and extrahepatic bile ducts: comparison of different acquisition and reconstruction planes. BMC Med Imaging 2014;14:16.
7. Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, Ferrone CR, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatog-raphy: comparison of 2-and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatogra-phy for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Com-put Assist Tomogr 2009;33(3):363-368.
8. Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS, et al. High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR cholangiography using a high-sampling-eff-ciency technique (SPACE) at 3T: comparison with the conventional constant fip angle sequence in healthy volunteers. J Magn Re-son Imaging 2008;28(3):685-690.
9. Matsunaga K, Ogasawara G, Tsukano M, Iwadate Y, Inoue Y. Usefulness of the navigator-echo triggering technique for free-breathing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31(3):396-400.
10. Morita S, Ueno E, Suzuki K, et al. Navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique vs. conventional respiratory-triggered technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP: an initial prospective comparative study using healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28(3): 673-677.
11. Almehdar A, Chavhan GB. MR cholan-giopancreatography at 3.0 T in children: diagnostic quality and ability in assessment of common paediatric pancreatobi-liary pathology. Br J Radiol 2013;86(1025): 20130036.
12. Mugler JP 3rd, Bao S, Mulkern RV, et al. Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;216(3):891-899.
13. Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS, et al. High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling effciency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T. Eur J Radiol 2010;73(1):114-118.
14. Block KT, Uecker M, Frahm J. Undersam-pled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57(6):1086-1098.
15. Chandarana H, Feng L, Block TK, et al. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Ra-diol 2013;48(1):10-16.
16. Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT, et al. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and fexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2014;72(3): 707-717.
17. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(6):1182-1195.
18. Otazo R, Kim D, Axel L, Sodickson DK. Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated frst-pass cardiac perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(3):767-776.
19. Vasanawala SS, Alley MT, Hargreaves BA, Barth RA, Pauly JM, Lustig M. Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. Radiology 2010;256(2):607-616.
20. Li G, Hennig J, Raithel E, et al. An L1-norm phase constraint for half-Fourier compressed sensing in 3D MR imaging. MAGMA 2015; 28(5):459-472.
21. Akansu AN, Haddad RA. Multiresolution signal decomposition: transforms, subbands, and wavelets. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press, 1992.
22. Beck A, Teboulle M. Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. IEEE Trans Image Proc 2009;18(11):2419-2434.
23. Stalder AF, Schmidt M, Quick HH, et al. Highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MRA with iterative reconstruction: Integration in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med 2015;74(6):1652-1660.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174.
25. Smith DS, Li X, Abramson RG, Quarles CC, Yankeelov TE, Welch EB. Potential of compressed sensing in quantitative MR imaging of cancer. Cancer Imaging 2013;13(4):633-644.
26. Rosenkrantz AB, Geppert C, Grimm R, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41(5):1365-1373.
27. Glockner JF, Saranathan M, Bayram E, Lee CU. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatog-raphy (MRCP) using a 3D Dixon fat-water separated balanced steady state free precession sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31(8):1263-1270.
28. Lavdas E, Vlychou M, Arikidis N, et al. How reliable is MRCP with an SS-FSE sequence at 3.0 T: comparison between SS-FSE BH and 3D-FSE BH ASSET sequences. Clin Imaging 2013;37(4):697-703.