Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 37-47

  Desgranges, François Pierrick ^a   Desebbe, Olivier ^b   Pereira de Souza Neto, Edmundo ^c,d,e   Raphael, Darren ^f   Chassard, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c Montauban Hospital   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^e PAULISTA UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

blood flow velocity; cardiac output; child; fluid therapy; hemodynamics

Indexed keywords

AORTA; AORTA FLOW; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD FLOW PEAK VELOCITY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BREATHING; BREATHING MECHANICS; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ODDS RATIO; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEART PRELOAD; HUMAN; INFANT; META ANALYSIS; NEGATIVE LIKELIHOOD RATIO; PHYSIOLOGY; POSITIVE LIKELIHOOD RATIO; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; INFANT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84979915837     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pan.12803     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000–2008.
2. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4: 282–289
3. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642–2647.
4. Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 487–497.
5. Benes J, Giglio M, Brienza N et al. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2014; 18: 584.
6. Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 1380–1392.
7. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119: 867–873.
8. Vallet B, Blanloeil Y, Cholley B et al. Guidelines for perioperative haemodynamic optimization. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2013; 32: e151–e158.
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006–1012.
10. Whiting PRA, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3: 25–38.
11. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A et al. MetaDiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 31.
12. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1129–1135.
13. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993; 12: 1293–1316.
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–1558.
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557–560.
16. Baker WL, White CM, Cappelleri JC et al. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of metaregression. Int J Clin Pract 2009; 63: 1426–1434.
17. Durand P, Chevret L, Essouri S et al. Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated children. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 888–894.
18. Choi DY, Kwak HJ, Park HY et al. Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow velocity as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 31: 1166–1170.
19. Pereira de Souza Neto P, Neto E, Grousson S et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children under general anaesthesia using dynamic parameters and transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 856–864.
20. Renner J, Broch O, Gruenewald M et al. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants using pleth variability index. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 582–589.
21. Byon HJ, Lim CW, Lee JH et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children undergoing neurosurgery. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 586–589.
22. Lee JY, Kim JY, Choi CH et al. The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children. Pediatr Cardiol 2014; 35: 289–294.
23. Lemson J, Nusmeier A, van der Hoeven JG. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 560–571.
24. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285–1293.
25. Galley HF. Editorial II: solid as a ROC. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 623–626.
26. Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Marano C et al. Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1429–1437.
27. Akao M, Katsube Y, Kamisago M et al. Developmental changes in left and right ventricular function evaluated with color tissue Doppler imaging and strain echocardiography. J Nippon Med Sch 2013; 80: 260–267.
28. Rowland DG, Gutgesell HP. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial contractility, preload, and afterload in healthy newborn infants. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 818–821.
29. Spotnitz WD, Spotnitz HM, Truccone NJ et al. Relation of ultrastructure and function. Sarcomere dimensions, pressure-volume curves, and geometry of the intact left ventricle of the immature canine heart. Circ Res 1979; 44: 679–691.
30. Wolf AR, Humphry AT. Limitations and vulnerabilities of the neonatal cardiovascular system: considerations for anesthetic management. Pediatr Anesth 2014; 24: 5–9.
31. Renner J, Cavus E, Meybohm P et al. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during different loading conditions in a paediatric animal model. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 374–380.
32. De BD, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: inluence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517–523.
33. Renner J, Meybohm P, Hanss R et al. Effects of norepinephrine on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during hemorrhage and after resuscitation in a pediatric porcine model. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 688–694.
34. Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2339–2343.
35. Borow KM, Come PC, Neumann A et al. Physiologic assessment of the inotropic, vasodilator and afterload reducing effects of milrinone in subjects without cardiac disease. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 1204–1209.
36. Chew MS, Poelaert J. Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1889–1894.
37. Yang XX, Critchley LA, Rowlands DK et al. Systematic error of cardiac output measured by bolus thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter compared with that measured by an aortic flow probe in a pig model. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 1133–1139.
38. Phillips RA, Hood SG, Jacobson BM et al. Transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): an ovine cardiac output validation. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012: 621496.
39. Robson SC, Murray A, Peart I et al. Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by cross sectional and Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 680–684.
40. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1180–1192.
41. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a ‘gray zone’ approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231–241.
42. Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care 2014; 18: 587.
43. Julien F, Hilly J, Sallah TB et al. Plethysmographic variability index (PVI) accuracy in predicting fluid responsiveness in anesthetized children. Pediatr Anesth 2013; 23: 536–546.
44. Vergnaud E, Vidal C, Verchère J et al. Stroke volume variation and indexed stroke volume measured using bioreactance predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative children. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 103–109.
45. Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014; 18: 650.
46. ® pulse oximeter to predict fluid or preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 777–783.
47. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1475–1483.
48. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 845–853.