A robust method for suppressing motion-induced coil sensitivity variations during prospective correction of head motion in fMRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1206-1219

  Faraji Dana, Zahra ^a,b   Tam, Fred ^b   Chen, J Jean ^a,c   Graham, Simon J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Canada   (Canada)

^c ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coil sensitivity maps; Echo planar imaging; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Head movements; Multi channel head coils

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; BOLD SIGNAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE ACQUISITION CORRECTION METHOD; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; YOUNG ADULT; ARTIFACT; BRAIN; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGING PHANTOM; MOTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84979210543     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. [1] Ogawa, S, Tank, D, Memon, R, Ellerman, J, Kim, S-G, Merkle, H, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89 (1992), 5951–5955.
2. [2] Ogawa, S, Lee, T-M, Nayak, AS, Glynn, P, Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 14 (1990), 68–78, 10.1002/mrm.1910140108.
3. [3] Ogawa, S, Menon, RS, Tank, DW, Kim, S, Merkle, H, Ellermann, JM, et al. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging a comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys J 64 (1993), 803–812.
4. [4] Gati, JS, Menon, RS, Ugurbil, K, Rutt, BK, Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue. Magn Reson Med 38 (1997), 296–302.
5. [5] Schulz, J, Siegert, T, Bazin, P-L, Maclaren, J, Herbst, M, Zaitsev, M, et al. Prospective slice-by-slice motion correction reduces false positive activations in fMRI with task-correlated motion. Neuroimage 84 (2014), 124–132, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.006.
6. [6] Thesen, S, Heid, O, Mueller, E, Schad, LR, Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn Reson Med 44 (2000), 457–465.
7. [7] Zaitsev, M, Dold, C, Sakas, G, Hennig, J, Speck, O, Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. Neuroimage 31 (2006), 1038–1050, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.039.
8. [8] White, N, Roddey, C, Shankaranarayanan, A, Han, E, Rettmann, D, Santos, J, et al. PROMO: real-time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking. Magn Reson Med 63 (2010), 91–105, 10.1002/mrm.22176.
9. [9] Aksoy, M, Forman, C, Straka, M, Çukur, T, Hornegger, J, Bammer, R, Hybrid prospective and retrospective head motion correction to mitigate cross-calibration errors. Magn Reson Med 67 (2012), 1237–1251, 10.1002/mrm.23101.
10. [10] Jezzard, P, Balaban, RS, Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 34 (1995), 65–73.
11. [11] Ooi, MB, Muraskin, J, Zou, X, Thomas, WJ, Krueger, S, Aksoy, M, et al. Combined prospective and retrospective correction to reduce motion-induced image misalignment and geometric distortions in EPI. Magn Reson Med 69 (2013), 803–811, 10.1002/mrm.24285.
12. [12] Rotenberg, D, Chiew, M, Ranieri, S, Tam, F, Chopra, R, Graham, SJ, Real-time correction by optical tracking with integrated geometric distortion correction for reducing motion artifacts in functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 69 (2013), 734–748, 10.1002/mrm.24309.
13. [13] Yarach, U, Luengviriya, C, Danishad, A, Stucht, D, Godenschweger, F, Schulze, P, et al. Correction of gradient nonlinearity artifacts in prospective motion correction for 7 T MRI. Magn Reson Med 73 (2015), 1562–1569, 10.1002/mrm.25283.
14. [14] Luengviriya, C, Yun, J, Speck, O, Combination of prospective and retrospective motion correction for multi-channel MRI In:. Proc. 18th Sci. Meet. Int. Conf. Syst. Eng., vol. q, 2010, 5023.
15. [15] Luengviriya, C, Yun, J, Lee, K, Maclaren, J, Speck, O, Necessity of sensitivity profile correction in retrospective motion correction. Proc. 18th Sci. Meet. Int. Conf. Syst. Eng., vol. 18, 2010, 3064.
16. [16] Yancey, SE, Rotenberg, DJ, Tam, F, Chiew, M, Ranieri, S, Biswas, L, et al. Spin-history artifact during functional MRI: potential for adaptive correction. Med Phys 38 (2011), 4634–4646, 10.1118/1.3583814.
17. [17] Seto, E, Sela, G, McIlroy, WE, Black, SE, Staines, WR, Bronskill, MJ, et al. Quantifying head motion associated with motor tasks used in fMRI. Neuroimage 14 (2001), 284–297, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0829.
18. [18] Zhao, T, Hu, X, Iterative GRAPPA (iGRAPPA) for improved parallel imaging reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 59 (2008), 903–907, 10.1002/mrm.21370.
19. [19] Bhat, H, Tisdall, MD, Cauley, SF, Witzel, T, Setsompop, K, van der Kouwe, AJW, et al. Simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) accelerated EPI navigators for prospective motion correction in the brain. Proc. 23rd Sci. Meet. Int. Soc. of. Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 23, 2015, 817 [Toronto].
20. [20] Papp, D, Callaghan, MF, Buckley, C, Meyer, H, Weiskopf, N, Inter-scan motion artefacts in quantitative R1 mapping require correction of coil sensitivity profiles. Proc. 23rd Sci. Meet. Int. Soc. of. Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 23, 2015, 2554 [Toronto].
21. [21] Lustig, M, Pauly, JM, SPIRiT: iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med 64 (2010), 457–471, 10.1002/mrm.22428.
22. [22] Tian, Q, Gong, E, Leuze, CWU, Pauly, J, McNab, J, Effects of motion on coupling of coil elements and parallel imaging reconstruction at 3 T and 7 T. Proc. 23rd Sci. Meet. Int. Soc. of. Magn. Reson. Med., Toronto, 2015, 6702.
23. [23] Roemer, PB, Edelstein, WA, Hayes, CE, Souza, SP, Mueller, OM, The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 16 (1990), 192–225, 10.1002/mrm.1910160203.
24. [24] Gonzalez-Castillo, J, Roopchansingh, V, Bandettini, PA, Bodurka, J, Physiological noise effects on the flip angle selection in BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 54 (2011), 2764–2778, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.020.
25. [25] Murphy, K, Bodurka, J, Bandettini, PA, How long to scan? The relationship between fMRI temporal signal to noise ratio and necessary scan duration. Neuroimage 34 (2007), 565–574, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.032.
26. [26] Bammer, R, Aksoy, M, Liu, C, Augmented generalized SENSE reconstruction to correct for rigid body motion. Magn Reson Med 57 (2007), 90–102, 10.1002/mrm.21106.
27. [27] Friedman, L, Glover, GH, Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. J Magn Reson Imaging 23 (2006), 827–839, 10.1002/jmri.20583.
28. [28] Gach, HM, Tanase, C, Boada, F, 2D & 3D Shepp–Logan phantom standards for MRI. Proc. 19th Sci. Meet. Int. Conf. Syst. Eng., 2008, Ieee, Las Vegas, 521–526, 10.1109/ICSEng.2008.15.
29. [29] Triantafyllou, C, Hoge, RD, Krueger, G, Wiggins, CJ, Potthast, A, Wiggins, GC, et al. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5T, 3T and 7T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. Neuroimage 26 (2005), 243–250, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.007.
30. [30] Park, H, Meyer, CR, Kim, B, Improved motion correction in fMRI by joint mapping of slices into an anatomical volume. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Med. Imaging Comput. Assist. Interv., Saint-Malo, 2004, 745–751.
31. [31] Cox, RW, AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29 (1996), 162–173.
32. [32] Heid, O, Method for the phase correction of nuclear magnetic resonance signals. 2000 [6043651].
33. [33] Collins, CM, Yang, B, Yang, QX, Smith, MB, Numerical calculations of the static magnetic field in three-dimensional multi-tissue models of the human head. Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2002), 413–424, 10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00507-6.
34. [34] Harris, F, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc IEEE 66 (1978), 51–83.
35. [35] McKenzie, CA, Yeh, EN, Ohliger, MA, Price, MD, Sodickson, DK, Self-calibrating parallel imaging with automatic coil sensitivity extraction. Magn Reson Med 47 (2002), 529–538, 10.1002/mrm.10087.
36. [36] Pruessmann, KP, Weiger, M, Scheidegger, MB, Boesiger, P, SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42 (1999), 952–962.
37. [37] Graham, ASJ, Ranieri, S, Boe, S, Ween, J, Tam, F, Schweizer, TA, fMRI simulator training to suppress head motion affiliations. Neurosci Biomed Eng, 2016.
38. [38] Jenkinson, M, Fast, automated, N-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm. Magn Reson Med 49 (2003), 193–197, 10.1002/mrm.10354.
39. [39] Smith, SM, Jenkinson, M, Woolrich, MW, Beckmann, CF, Behrens, TEJ, Johansen-Berg, H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23:Suppl. 1 (2004), S208–S219, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051.
40. [40] Friston, KJ, Holmes, AP, Worsley, KJ, Poline, J-P, Frith, CD, Frackowiak, RSJ, Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2 (1995), 189–210.
41. [41] Benjamini, Y, Hochberg, Y, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57 (1995), 289–300.
42. [42] Dice, L, Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecol Soc Am 26 (1945), 297–302.
43. [43] Kaza, E, Klose, U, Lotze, M, Comparison of a 32-channel with a 12-channel head coil: are there relevant improvements for functional imaging?. J Magn Reson Imaging 34 (2011), 173–183, 10.1002/jmri.22614.
44. [44] Xiang, Q-S, Ye, FQ, Correction for geometric distortion and N/2 ghosting in EPI by phase labeling for additional coordinate encoding (PLACE). Magn Reson Med 57 (2007), 731–741, 10.1002/mrm.21187.
45. [45] Andersson, JLR, Skare, S, Ashburner, J, How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20 (2003), 870–888, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7.
46. [46] Zeng, H, Constable, RT, Image distortion correction in EPI: comparison of field mapping with point spread function mapping. Magn Reson Med 48 (2002), 137–146, 10.1002/mrm.10200.
47. [47] Wang, J, Kluge, T, Nittka, M, Jellus, V, Kuehn, B, Kiefer, B, Parallel acquisition techniques with modified SENSE reconstruction mSENSE. Proc. first Wurzbg. Work. Parallel imaging basics Clin. Appl., Wurzburg, 2001, 89.
48. [48] Gopinath, K, Crosson, B, Mcgregor, K, Peck, K, Moore, A, Sherod, M, et al. Selective detrending method for reducing task-correlated motion artifact during speech in event-related FMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 30 (2009), 1105–1119, 10.1002/hbm.20572.Selective.