Correction of gradient nonlinearity artifacts in prospective motion correction for 7T MRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1562-1569

  Yarach, Uten ^a,b   Luengviriya, Chaiya ^c   Danishad, Appu ^a   Stucht, Daniel ^a   Godenschweger, Frank ^a   Schulze, Peter ^a,d   Speck, Oliver ^a,d,e,f  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^d GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

^e LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^f Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences   (Germany)

Author keywords

coil sensitivity mismatch; gradient nonlinearity; gradient warp correction; prospective motion correction

Indexed keywords

BINARY ALLOYS; COBALT ALLOYS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); ERRORS; HARMONIC FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOLYBDENUM ALLOYS; SIGNAL ENCODING;

ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES; COIL SENSITIVITY; GEOMETRIC DISTORTION; GRADIENT NONLINEARITY; MOTION CORRECTION; RETROSPECTIVE CORRECTIONS; SENSITIVITY ENCODING; SPHERICAL HARMONIC FUNCTIONS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MOTION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTION; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84925427821     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25283     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ehman RL, Felmlee JP,. Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. Radiology 1989; 173: 255-263.
2. Pipe JG,. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 963-969.
3. Derbyshire JA, Wright GA, Henkelman RM, Hinks RS,. Dynamic scan-plane tracking using MR position monitoring. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 924-932.
4. Bydder M, Larkman DJ, Hajnal JV,. Detection and elimination of motion artifacts by regeneration of k-space. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 677-686.
5. Atkinson D, Hill DL, Stoyle PN, Summers PE, Clare S, Bowtell R, Keevil SF,. Automatic compensation of motion artifacts in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41: 163-170.
6. Batchelor PG, Atkinson D, Irarrazaval P, Hill DL, Hajnal J, Larkman D,. Matrix description of general motion correction applied to multishot images. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1273-1280.
7. Thesen S, Heid O, Mueller E, Schad LR,. Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 457-465.
8. Ward HA, Riederer SJ, Grimm RC, Ehman RL, Felmlee JP, Jack CR Jr,. Prospective multiaxial motion correction for fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 459-469.
9. Zaitsev M, Dold C, Sakas G, Hennig J, Speck O,. Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. NeuroImage 2006; 31: 1038-1050.
10. Maclaren J, Herbst M, Speck O, Zaitsev M,. Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: a review. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 621-636.
11. Atkinson D, Larkman DJ, Batchelor PG, Hill DL, Hajnal JV,. Coil-based artifact reduction. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 825-830.
12. Liu C, Moseley ME, Bammer R,. Simultaneous phase correction and SENSE reconstruction for navigated multi-shot DWI with non-cartesian k-space sampling. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1412-1422.
13. Bammer R, Aksoy M, Liu C,. Augmented generalized SENSE reconstruction to correct for rigid body motion. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 90-102.
14. Wang D, Strugnell W, Cowin G, Doddrell DM, Slaughter R,. Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems part II: correction using a 3D phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 1223-1232.
15. Doran SJ, Charles-Edwards L, Reinsberg SA, Leach MO,. A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 1345-1361.
16. Baldwin LN, Wachowicz K, Thomas SD, Rivest R, Gino Fallone B,. Characterization, prediction and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images. Med Phys 2007; 34: 388-399.
17. Langlois S, Desvignes M, Constans JM, Revenu M,. MRI geometric distortion: a simple approach to correcting the effects of non-linear gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 821-831.
18. Polzin JA, Kruger DG, Gurr DH, Brittain JH, Riederer SJ,. Correction for gradient nonlinearity in continuously moving table MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 181-187.
19. Hu HH, Madhuranthakam AJ, Kruger DG, Glockner JF, Riederer SJ,. Continuously moving table MRI with SENSE: application in peripheral contrast enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1025-1031.
20. Luengviriya C., Necessity of sensitivity profile correction in retrospective motion correction. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010. Abstract 3064.
21. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Bornert P, Boesiger P,. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 638-651.
22. Fessler J., Image reconstruction toolbox. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Available at http://web.eecs.umich.edu/afessler/irt/fessler.tgz. Accessed on October 15, 2012.
23. Janke A, Zhao H, Cowin GJ, Galloway GJ, Doddrell DM,. Use of spherical harmonic deconvolution methods to compensate for nonlinear gradient effects on MRI images. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 115-122.
24. Keys RG,. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 1981; 29: 1153-1160.
25. Koay CG, Sarlls JE, Ozarslan E,. Three dimensional analytical magnetic resonance imaging phantom in the Fourier domain. Magn Reson Med 2003; 58: 430-436.
26. Maclaren J, Armstrong BSR, Barrows RT, et al. Measurement and Correction of Microscopic Head Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e48088.
27. Kroon D-J, Multimodality non-rigid demon algorithm image registration. Mathworks Web site. Available at http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange /21451-multimodality-non-rigid-demon-algorithm-image-registration. Accessed on December 1, 2012.
28. Luengviriya C., Necessity of sensitivity profile correction in retrospective motion correction at 7T MRI. In ISMRM Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRM, Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria, 2010. Abstract 10.
29. Archip N, Clatz O, Whalen S, Dimaio SP, Black PM, Jolesz FA, Golby A, Warfield SK,. Compensation of geometrical distortion effects on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for enhanced visualization in image-guided neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 209-216.
30. Sumanaweera T, Adler JR, Napel S, Glover GH,. Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implications for stereotaxic surgery. Neurosurgery 1994; 35: 696-704.
31. Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DMC, Kemeny AA,. Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 131-139.
32. van der Kouwe AJ, Benner T, Dale AM,. Real-time rigid body motion correction and shimming using cloverleaf navigators. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 1019-1032.
33. Ooi MB, Muraskin J, Zou X, Thomas WJ, Krueger S, Aksoy M, Bammer R, Brown TR,. Combined prospective and retrospective correction to reduce motion-induced image misalignment and geometric distortions in EPI. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 803-811.
34. Wang H, Balter J, Cao Y,. Patient-induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortion of clinical brain MRI for radiation treatment planning on a 3T scanner. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58: 465-477.
35. Wang D, Strugnell W, Cowin G, Doddrell DM, Slaughter R,. Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 1211-1221.
36. Banerjee S, Beatty PJ, Zhang JZ, Shankaranarayanan A,. Parallel and partial Fourier imaging with prospective motion correction. Magn Reson Med. 2013; 69: 421-433.
37. Maclaren J, Lee KJ, Luengviriya C, Speck O, Zaitsev M,. Combined prospective and retrospective motion correction to relax navigator requirements. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 1724-1732.