Computer-mediated communication

Interpersonal Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 541-564

  Walther, Joseph B ^a   Lee, Eun Ju ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication (CMC); Hyperpersonal model; Social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE); Social information processing(SIP) theory; Social presence theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979176499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110276794.541     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
2. Antheunis, Marjolijn, Patti M. Valkenburg and Jochen Peter. 2010. Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior 26: 100-109.
3. Biocca, Frank, Chad Harms and Judee Burgoon. 2003. Towards a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12: 456-480.
4. Burgoon, Judee and Beth Le Poire. 1993. Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research 20: 67-96.
5. Burgoon, Judee, Joseph Bonito, Artemio Ramirez, Norah Dunbar, Karadeen Kam and Jenna Fischer. 2002. Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication 52: 657-677.
6. Derks, Daantje, Arjan Bos and Jasper von Grumbkow. 2007. Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior 23: 842-849.
7. Douglas, Karen and Craig Mc Garty. 2001. Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology 40: 399-416.
8. Dubrosky, Vitaly, Sara Kiesler and Beheruz Sethna. 1991. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction 6: 119-146.
9. Epley, Nicholas and Justin Kruger. 2005. What you type isn't what they read: The perseverance of stereotypes and expectancies over email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41: 414-422.
10. Fogg, B. J. and Clifford Nass. 1997. Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal ofHuman-Computer Studies 46: 551-561.
11. Friedman, Raymond and Steven Currall. 2003. Conflict escalation: Dispute exacerbating elements of email communication. Human Relations 56: 1325-1347.
12. Ganayem, Asmaa, Elaine Hoter, Miri Shonfeld, and Joseph Walther. 2011. November. Virtual groups and the reduction of intergroup prejudice using CMC: A controlled, longitudinal field experiment among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
13. Gasiorek, Jessica, Howard Giles, Thomas Holtgraves and Stephanie Robbins. 2012. Celebrating thirty years of the JLSP: Analyses and prospects. Journal ofLanguage and Social Psychology 31: 361-375.
14. Gonzales, Amy and Jeffrey Hancock. 2008. Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychology 11: 167-185.
15. Green, Melanie and Timothy Brock. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 701-721.
16. Green, Melanie, Sheryl Kass, Jana Carrey, Benjamin Herzig, Ryan Feeney and John Sabini. 2008. Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology 11: 512-539.
17. Hartmann, Tilo and Charlotte Goldhoorn. 2011. Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers' experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication 61: 1104-1121.
18. Hian, Lee Bee, Sim Li Chuan, Tan Mot Kiat Trevor and Benjamin Detenber. 2004. Getting to know you: Exploring the development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9. Retrieved January 3, 2007. from http:// jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue3/detenber.html.
19. Hiltz, Starr, Kenneth Johnson and Murray Turoff. 1986. Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research 13: 225-252.
20. Horton, Donald and Anselm Strauss. 1957. Interaction in audience participation shows. The American Journal of Sociology 62: 579-587.
21. Horton, Donald and Richard Wohl. 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19: 215-229.
22. Ickes, William, Miles Patterson, Donald Rajecki and Sarah Tanford. 1982. Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to pre-interaction expectancies. Social Cognition 1: 160-190.
23. Jacobson, David. 1999. Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5. Retrieved May 18, 2000, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html.
24. Johnson, Jeff. 1994. Scenarios of people using the NII. CPSR News 12. Retrieved from http:// cpsr.org/prevsite/publications/newsletters/issues/1994/Fall1994/johnson2.html/.
25. Joinson, Adam. 1998. Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In: Jayne Gackenbach (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications, 43-60. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. Joinson, Adam. 2001. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of selfawareness and visual anonymity, European Journal of Social Psychology 31: 177-192.
27. Kelly, Janice and Joseph McGrath. 1985. Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 395-407.
28. Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel and Timothy W. McGuire. 1984. Social psychological aspect of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39: 1123-1134.
29. Kiesler, Sara and Lee Sproull. 1992. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52: 96-123.
30. Lea, Martin and Russell Spears. 1991. Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34: 283-301.
31. Lea, Martin and Russell Spears. 1992. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing 2: 321-341.
32. Lea, Martin, Russell Spears and Daphne de Groot. 2001. Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on group polarization in CMC within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 526-537.
33. Lee, Eun-Ju. 2006. When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research 33: 423-447.
34. Lee, Eun-Ju. 2007. Effects of gendered language on gender stereotyping in computer-mediated communication: The moderating role of depersonalization and gender-role orientation. Human Communication Research 33: 515-535.
35. Lee, Eun-Ju and Jeong-woo Jang. 2013. Not so imaginary interpersonal contact with public figures on social network sites: How affiliative tendency moderates its effects. Communication Research 40: 27-52.
36. Lee, Eun-Ju and Soo Youn Oh. 2012. To personalize or depersonalize? When and how politicians' personalized tweets affect the public's reactions. Journal of Communication 62: 932-949.
37. Lee, Eun-Ju and Soo Yun Shin. In press. When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians' Twitter communication. Communication Research.
38. Lee, Kwan Min. 2004. Presence, explicated. Communication Theory 14: 27-50.
39. Lee, Kwan Min, Wei Peng, Seung AJin and Chang Yan. 2006. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Communication 56: 754-772.
40. Lombard, Matthew, Robert Reich, Maria Grabe, Cheryl Bracken and Theresa Ditton. 2000. Presence and television: The role of screen size. Human Communication Research 26: 7598.
41. Mc Kenna, Katelyn and John Bargh. 1999. Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology 1: 249-269.
42. Moon, Youngme and Clifford Nass. 1996. How “real” are computer personalities?: Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research 23: 651-674.
43. Nass, Clifford and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal ofSocial Issues 56: 81-103.
44. Nass, Clifford, Youngme Moon and Nancy Green. 1997. Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27: 864-876.
45. Okdie, Bradley, Rosanna Guadagno, Frank Bernieri, Andrew Geers and Amber Mclarney-Vesotski. 2011. Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 27: 153-159.
46. Peter, Jochen, Patti Valkenburg and Alexander Schouten. 2005. Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 8: 423-430.
47. Postmes, Tom and Russell Spears. 2002. Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 1073-1083.
48. Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears and Martin Lea. 1999. Social identity, normative content and “deindividuation” in computer-mediated groups. In: Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears, and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content, 164-183. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
49. Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, Antonia Lee and Rosemary Novak. 2005. Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89: 747-763.
50. Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, Khaled Sakhel and Daphne de Groot. 2001. Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 1243-1254.
51. Prentice-Dunn, Steven and Ronald Rogers. 1980. Effects of deindividuating situational cues and aggressive models on subjective deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 104-113
52. Ramirez, Artemio, Shuangyue Zhang, Cat McGrew and Shu-Fang Lin. 2007. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction: A comparison of participant-observer perspectives. Communication Monographs 74: 492-516.
53. Reeves, Byron and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54. Rice, Ronald and Donald Case. 1983. Electronic message systems in the university: A description of use and utility. Journal of Communication 33: 131-154.
55. Roberts, Lynne, Leigh Smith and Clare Pollock. 1996. September A model of social interaction via computer-mediated communication in real-time text-based virtual environments. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Psychological Society, Sydney.
56. Rogers, Paul and Martin Lea. 2004. Cohesion in online groups. In: Konrad Morgan, Carlos Brebbia, Javier Sanchez and Alexander Voiskounsky (eds). Human perspectives in the Internet society: Culture, psychology and gender, 115-124. Southampton: WIT Press.
57. Rosenthal, Robert. 1993. Interpersonal expectancies: Some antecedents and some consequences. In: Peter David Blanck (ed.), Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, 242-260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Shamp, Scott. 1991. Mechanomorphism in perception of computer communication partners. Computers in Human Behavior 7: 141-161
59. Short, John, Ederyn Williams and Bruce Christie. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
60. Siegel, Jane, Vitaly Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler and Timothy Mc Guire. 1986. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37: 157-187.
61. Skalski, Paul and Ron Tamborini. 2007. The role of social presence in interactive agent-based persuasion. Media Psychology 10: 385-413.
62. Snyder, Mark, Elizabeth Tanke and Ellen Berscheid. 1977. Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 656-666.
63. Spears, Russell, Martin Lea and Stephen Lee. 1990. De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology 29: 121-134.
64. Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler 1992, February 3. Don't forget Dr. Frankenstein. Computerworld 25.
65. Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Interindividual behavior and intergroup behavior. In: Henri Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, 61-76. London: Academic Press.
66. Tanis, Martin and Tom Postmes. 2003. Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication 53: 676-693.
67. Thompson, Leigh and Janice Nadler. 2002. Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application. Journal ofSocial Issues 58: 109-124.
68. Tidwell, Lisa and Joseph Walther. 2002. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research 28: 317-348.
69. Tong, Stephanie, Brandon Van Der Heide, Lindsey Langwell and Joseph Walther. 2008. Too much of a good thing?: The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: 531-549.
70. Tong, Stephanie and Joseph Walther. In press. The confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research.
71. Turner, John. 1987. A self-categorization theory. In: John Turner, Michael Hogg, Penelope Oakes, Stephen Reicher, and Margaret Wetherell (eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory, 42-67. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
72. Walther, Joseph. 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research 19: 52-90.
73. Walther, Joseph. 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23: 3-43.
74. Walther, Joseph. 2006. Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or: (and the net: ('s with you,:) and you:) alone. In: Valerie Manusov and Miles Patterson (eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication, 461-479. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. Walther, Joseph. 2007. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior 23: 2538-2557.
76. Walther, Joseph. 2012. Interaction through technological lenses: Computer-mediated communication and language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31: 397-414.
77. Walther, Joseph and Natalya Bazarova. 2008. Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research 35: 622-645.
78. Walther, Joseph and Caleb Carr. 2010. Internet interaction and intergroup dynamics: Problems and solutions in computer-mediated communication. In: Howard Giles, Scott Reid, and Jake Harwood (eds.), The dynamics of intergroup communication, 209-220. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
79. Walther, Joseph, Yuhua Liang, David DeAndrea, Stephanie Tong, Caleb Carr, Erin Spottswood and Yair Amichai-Hamburger. 2011. The effect of feedback on identity shift in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychology 14: 1-26.
80. Walther, Joseph, Tracy Loh and Laura Granka. 2005. Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and FtF affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24: 36-65.
81. Walther, Joseph, Brandon Van Der Heide, Stephanie Tong, Caleb Carr and Charles Atkin. 2010. Effects of interpersonal goals on inadvertent intrapersonal influence in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research 36: 323-347.
82. Wang, Zuoming, Joseph Walther and Jeffrey Hancock. 2009. Social identification and interpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication: What you do versus who you are in virtual groups. Human Communication Research 35: 59-85.
83. Wilson, Jeanne, Susan Straus and Bill McEvily. 2006. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and FtF groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99: 16-33.