An analysis of public participation in the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence river study

Water Co-Management

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 48-77

  Carr, Gemma ^a   Loucks, Daniel P ^b   Blöschl, Günter ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979038052     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b14591     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Beierle, T.C. 1998. Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals. Discussion Paper 99-06. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, USA.
2. Beierle, T.C and D.M. Konisky. 2000. Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(4): 587-602.
3. Bentrup, G. 2001. Evaluation of a Collaborative Model: A Case Study Analysis of Watershed Planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management 27(5): 739-748.
4. Blackstock, K.L., G.J. Kelly and B.L. Horsey. 2007. Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics 60: 726-742.
5. Burgess, J. and J.Chilvers. 2006. Upping the ante: a conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy 33(10):713-28.
6. Carr, G., G. Bloeschl and D.P. Loucks. 2012. Evaluating participation in water resource management: A review. Water Resources Research 48, W11401.
7. Chess, C. and K. Purcell. 1999. Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environmental Science and Technology 33(16): 2685-2692
8. Chilvers, J. Deliberative and Participatory Approaches in Environmental Geography. In:N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman and B. Rhoads [eds.]. 2009. A Companion to Environmental Geography, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
9. Clinton Edmonds and Associates Limited. 2002. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River-Changes in the Institutional Structure and Their Impact on Water Levels, 1950-2001. Report to International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board University of Ottawa, Institute of the Environment.
10. Collins, K., C. Blackmore, D. Morris and D. Watson. 2007. A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environmental Science and Policy 10: 564-574.
11. Conley, A. and M.A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16: 371-386.
12. Connick, S. and J.E. Innes. 2003. Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(2): 177-197.
13. Duram, L.A. and K.G. Brown. 1999. Assessing public participation in US watershed planning initiatives. Society and Natural Resources 12: 455-467.
14. Eberhardt, A.J., J.C. Rassam and L. Duckstein. Operation and management of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River System: Present and future options. pp. 217-232. In: J. Ganoulis, L. Duckstein, P. Literarthy and I. Bogardi [eds.]. 1996. Transboundary Water Resources Management: Institutional and Engineering Approaches. NATO ASI Series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. GLIN. 2011. Great Lakes-St Lawrence River System. Great Lakes Information Network. Map produced by US Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District, Detroit, Michigan. http:// gis.glin.net/maps/.
16. Hedelin, B. 2007. Criteria for assessment of sustainable water management. Environmental Management 39: 151-163. http://www.boatnerd.com.
17. Hedelin, B. 2011. http://www.boatnerd.com/news/newsthumbs/images-07-3/smchl72607bh.jpg. Accessed August, 2011.
18. IJC. 1909. Boundary Waters Treaty.
19. IJC. 1998. The International Joint Commission and the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909. September, 1998. Washington/Ottawa.
20. IJC. 1999. Plan of Study for Criteria Review in the Orders of Approval for the Regulation of Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Levels and Flows. Prepared for the International Joint Commission By The St. Lawrence River-Lake Ontario Plan of Study Team. September, 1999. Washington/Ottawa.
21. IJC. 2008. Your Guide to the IJCs Proposed new Order of Approval and Plan. 2007. International Joint Commission. Washington/Ottawa.
22. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher. 2004. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice 5(4): 419-436.
23. Jiggins, J., E. van Slobbe and N. Röling. 2007. The organisation of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of The Netherlands. Environmental Science and Policy 10: 526-536.
24. Kitchin, R. and N.J. Tate. 2000. Conducting Research in Human Geography: Theory, Methodology and Practice. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow, England.
25. Klinke, A. 2009. Deliberatie transnationalism-Transnational governance, public participation and expert deliberation. Forest Policy and Economics 11: 348-356.
26. Leach, W.D., N.W. Pelkey and P.A. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder Partnerships as Collaborative Policymaking: Evaluation Criteria Applied to Watershed Management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(4): 645-670.
27. LOSL Study Board. 2006. Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows. Final Report by the International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board to the International Joint Commission, March, 2006.
28. Loucks, D.P. 2006. Modeling and managing the interactions between hydrology, ecology and economics. Journal of Hydrology 328: 408-416.
29. Moote, M.A., M.P. McClaran and D.K. Chickering. 1997. Theory in practice: Applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management, 21(6): 877-889.
30. Mostert, E., C. Pahl-Wostl, Y. Rees, B.Seare, D. Tàbara and J. Tippett. 2007. Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society 12(1): 19 [online].
31. Muro, M. and P. Jeffrey. 2006. A review of participatory test and evaluation approaches for water management. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 6(5): 1-8.
32. Newig, J. and O. Fritsch. More Input-Better Output: Does citizen involvement improve environmental governance? In: I. Blühdorn [ed.]. 2009. In Search of Legitimacy. Policy Making in Europe and the Challenge of Complexity. Opladen, Farmington Hills.
33. Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Craps, A. Dewulf, E. Mostert, D. Tabara and T. Taillieu. 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12(2): 5[online].
34. Pretty, J.N. 2003. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912-1914.
35. Petts, J. 2006. Managing public engagement to optimize learning: Reflections from urban river restoration. Human Ecology Review 13(2): 172-181.
36. Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417-2431.
37. Rowe, G. and L.J. Frewer. 2000. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values 25(1): 3-29.
38. Steyaert, P., M. Barzman, J. Billaud, H. Brives, B. Hubert, G. Ollivier and B. Roche. 2007. The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environmental Science and Policy 10: 537-550.
39. Walker, G.B., S.L. Senecah and S.E. Daniels. 2006. From the forest to the river: Citizens’ views of stakeholder engagement. Human Ecology Review 13(2): 193-202.
40. Webler, T. “Right” discourse in citizen participation: an evaluation yardstick. pp. 35-86. In:O. Renn, T. Webler and P. Wiedemann [eds.]. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation-Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
41. Webler, T. 1999. The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process. Journal of Risk Research 2(1): 55-71.
42. Webler, T., S. Tuler and R. Krueger. 2001. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27(3): 435-450.
43. Werick, W. The Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence Rive Study. pp. 71-90. In: E. Bourget [ed.]. 2011. Converging Waters: Integrating Collaborative Modeling with Participatory Processes to Make Water Resources Decisions. Maass-White Series, The Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, United States.