Stakeholder Partnerships as Collaborative Policymaking: Evaluation Criteria Applied to Watershed Management in California and Washington

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 645-670

  Leach, William D ^a   Pelkey, Neil W ^b   Sabatier, Paul A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JUNIATA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038300412     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.10079     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Beierle, T.C. (1998). Public participation in environmental decisions: An evaluation framework using social goals. Discussion paper 99-06. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
2. Beierle, T.C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
3. Beierle, T.C., & Konisky, D.M. (1999). Public participation in environmental planning in the Great Lakes region. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
4. Bellamy, J.A., McDonald, G.T., Syme, G.J., & Butterworth, I.E. (1999). Evaluating integrated resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 337-353.
5. Bobrowsky, D. (2000). Creating a global public policy network in the apparel industry: The apparel industry partnership. Case study for the UN Vision Project on Global Public Policy Networks. www.globalpublicpolicy.net.
6. Born, S. M., & Genskow, K. D. (1999). Exploring the watershed approach: Critical dimensions of state-local partnerships. The Four Corners Watershed Innovators Initiative Final Report. Portland, OR: River Network.
7. Born, S.M., & Genskow, K.D. (2000). The watershed approach: An empirical assessment of innovation in environmental management. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.
8. Born, S.M., & Genskow, K.D. (2001). Toward understanding new watershed initiatives: A report from the Madison Watershed Workshop. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
9. Carr, D.S., Selin, S.W., & Schuett, M.A. (1998). Managing public forests: Understanding the role of collaborative planning. Environmental Management, 22, 767-776.
10. Coe, Robert. (2000). What is an effect size? A guide for users. Available at: www.cem.dur.ac.uk/ebeuk/research/effectsize/ESguide.htm.
11. Coggins, G. C. (1999). Regulating federal natural resources: a summary case against devolved collaboration. Ecology Law Quarterly, 25, 602-610.
12. Coglianese, C. (1999). The limits of consensus. Environment, 41, 28-33.
13. Coglianese, C. (2001). Is satisfaction success? Evaluating public participation in regulatory policy making. Conference on evaluating environmental and public policy dispute resolution programs and policies, Washington, DC, March 8-9.
14. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
15. Connell, J.P., & Kubisch, A.C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. In Fullbright-Anderson, Kubisch, & Connell, eds. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (vol. 2, pp. 15-44). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
16. Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B., & Weiss, C.H., Eds. (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
17. EPA. (1999). EPA's framework for community-based environmental protection, EPA 237-K-99-001. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
18. EPA & USDA. (1998). Clean water action plan: Restoring and protecting America's waters. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Agriculture.
19. Ewing, S.A., Grayson, R.B., & Argent, R.M. (2000). Science, citizens, and catchments: Decision support for catchment planning in Australia. Society and Natural Resources, 13, 443-459.
20. Federal Register. (2000). Unified federal policy for ensuring a watershed approach to federal land and resource management; notices, February 22, 65(35), 8834-8840.
21. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
22. Gonzales, J.L., Lauder, K., & Melles, B. (2000). Opting for partnership: governance innovations in Southeast Asia. Ottawa: Institute on Governance.
23. Griffin, C. B. (1999). Watershed councils: An emerging form of public participation in natural resource management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35, 505-518.
24. Halla, F., & Majani, B. (1999). Innovative ways for solid waste management in Dar-es-Salaam: Toward stakeholder partnerships. Habitat International, 23, 351-361.
25. Harrington, J., & Born, M. (2000). Measuring the health of California streams and rivers: A methods manual for resource professionals, citizen monitors, and natural resources students, second edition. Sacramento, CA: Sustainable Land Stewardship International Institute.
26. Huntington, C.W., & Sommarstrom, S. (2000). An evaluation of selected watershed councils in the Pacific Northwest and northern California. Eugene, OR: Trout Unlimited and Pacific Rivers Council.
27. Innes, J.E. (1999). Evaluating consensus building. In Susskind, McKearnan, & Thomas-Larmer, (Eds.) The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement (pp. 631-675). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Innes, J.E., & Booher, D.E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412-423.
29. Innes, J.E., Gruber, J., Neuman, M., & Thompson, R. (1994). Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building. Berkeley, CA: California Policy Seminar.
30. Karr, J.R., & Chu, E.W. (1999). Restoring life to running waters: Better biological monitoring. Washington, DC: Island Press.
31. Kenney, D.S. (1999). Historical and sociopolitical context of the western watersheds movement. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35, 493-503.
32. Kenney, D. S. (2000). Arguing about consensus: Examining the case against western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resources management. Boulder: University of Colorado School of Law.
33. Kenney, D.S., McAllister, S.T., Caile, W.H., & Peckham, J.S. (2000). The new watershed source book: A directory and review of watershed initiatives in the western United States. Boulder: University of Colorado School of Law.
34. Kier, W. (1995). Watershed restoration: A guide for citizen involvement in California, Decision Analysis Series No. 8. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
35. Kingsley, G.T., McNeely, J. B., & Gibson, J.O. (1997). Community building coming of age. Baltimore, MD: Development Training Institute and Urban Institute.
36. Kondolf, G.M. (1995). Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology, 3, 133-136.
37. Kondolf, G.M., & Micheli, E.R. (1995). Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management, 19, 1-15.
38. Kusel, J. (1996). Well-being in forest-dependent communities, pt. I: A new approach. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress (vol. 2). Davis: University of California.
39. Leach, W. D. (2002). Surveying diverse stakeholder groups. Society and Natural Resources, 15(7), 641-649.
40. Leach, W.D., & Pelkey, N.W. (2001). Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127, 378-385.
41. Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology, 2nd English ed. New York: Elsevier.
42. Margerum, R.D. (1999). Integrated environmental management: The foundations for successful practice. Environmental Management, 24, 151-166.
43. Mazmanian, D.A., & Sabatier, P.A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
44. McCloskey, M. (1996). The skeptic: Collaboration has its limits. High Country News, 28, May 13.
45. McGinnis, M.V. (1996). Deep ecology and the foundations of restoration. Inquiry-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 39, 203-217.
46. Meadowcroft, J. (1999). Cooperative management regimes: collaborative problem-solving to implement sustainable development. International Negotiation Journal, 4, 225-254.
47. Miranda, M.L., Miller, J.N., & Jacobs, T.L. (2000). Talking trash about landfills: Using quantitative scoring schemes in landfill siting processes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 3-22.
48. Moote, M.A., McClaran, M.P., & Chickering, D.K. (1997). Theory in practice: Applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management, 21, 877-889.
49. Mullen, M.W., & Allison, B.E. (1999). Stakeholder involvement and social capital: Keys to watershed management success in Alabama. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35, 655-662.
50. National Research Council. (1999). New strategies for America's watersheds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. Ogu, V.I. (2000). Stakeholders' partnership approach to infrastructure provision and management in developing world cities: Lessons from the Sustainable Ibadan project. Habitat International, 24, 517-533.
52. Ozawa, C., & Podziba, S. (1997). Social learning and the building of social capital. Resolve 28, 9.
53. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
54. Rieke, B., & Kenney, D. (1997). Resource management at the watershed level: An assessment of the changing federal role in the emerging era of community-based watershed management. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law.
55. Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1989). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25, 3-29.
57. Sabatier, P. A., & Pelkey, N. W. (1990). Land development at Lake Tahoe: The effects of environmental controls and economic conditions on housing construction. Davis, CA: FAU/FIU Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems, and the Institute of Ecology, University of California.
58. Selin, S., & Chavez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 19, 189-95.
59. Sinclair, A. J., & Smith, D. L. (1999). The Model Forest Program in Canada: Building consensus on sustainable forest management? Society and Natural Resources, 12, 121-138.
60. Stern, P. C., & Fineberg, H. V. (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
61. Syme, G.J., & Sadler, B.S. (1994). Evaluation of public involvement in water resources planning: A researcher-practitioner dialogue. Evaluation Review, 18, 523-542.
62. Toupal, R.S., & Johnson, M.D. (1998). Conservation partnerships: indicators of success. Tucson: NRCS Social Sciences Institute, University of Arizona.
63. Weiss, C.H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
64. Weiss, C.H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In Connell, Kubisch, Schorr, & Weiss, eds., New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-92). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
65. Yaffee, S.L., Phillips, A.F., Frentz, I.C., Hardy, P.W., Maleki, S.M., & Thorpe, B.E. (1996). Ecosystem management in the United States: An assessment of current experiences. Washington, DC: Island Press.