FamPipe: An Automatic Analysis Pipeline for Analyzing Sequencing Data in Families for Disease Studies

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Chung, Ren Hua ^a   Tsai, Wei Yun ^a   Kang, Chen Yu ^a   Yao, Po Ju ^a   Tsai, Hui Ju ^a,b,c   Chen, Chia Hsiang ^d,e  

^a NATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOMES; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

ANALYSIS TOOLS; AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOMAL REGIONS; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; CURRENT ANALYSIS; DISEASE MODELS; NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; SIMULATION STUDIES;

PIPELINES;

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; INTERNET; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84978864803     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004980     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Pabinger S, Dander A, Fischer M, Snajder R, Sperk M, et al. (2014) A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Brief Bioinform15: 256–278. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs08623341494
2. San Lucas FA, Wang G, Scheet P, Peng B, (2012) Integrated annotation and analysis of genetic variants from next-generation sequencing studies with variant tools. Bioinformatics28: 421–422. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr66722138362
3. Hu H, Huff CD, Moore B, Flygare S, Reese MG, et al. (2013) VAAST 2.0: improved variant classification and disease-gene identification using a conservation-controlled amino acid substitution matrix. Genet Epidemiol37: 622–634. doi: 10.1002/gepi.2174323836555
4. Wijsman EM, (2012) The role of large pedigrees in an era of high-throughput sequencing. Hum Genet131: 1555–1563. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1190-222714655
5. Sincan M, Simeonov DR, Adams D, Markello TC, Pierson TM, et al. (2012) VAR-MD: a tool to analyze whole exome-genome variants in small human pedigrees with mendelian inheritance. Hum Mutat33: 593–598. doi: 10.1002/humu.2203422290570
6. Yao J, Zhang KX, Kramer M, Pellegrini M, McCombie WR, (2014) FamAnn: an automated variant annotation pipeline to facilitate target discovery for family-based sequencing studies. Bioinformatics.
7. Vandeweyer G, Van Laer L, Loeys B, Van den Bulcke T, Kooy RF, (2014) VariantDB: a flexible annotation and filtering portal for next generation sequencing data. Genome Med6: 74. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0074-625352915
8. Koboldt DC, Larson DE, Sullivan LS, Bowne SJ, Steinberg KM, et al. (2014) Exome-based mapping and variant prioritization for inherited Mendelian disorders. Am J Hum Genet94: 373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.01.01624560519
9. Miyazawa H, Kato M, Awata T, Kohda M, Iwasa H, et al. (2007) Homozygosity haplotype allows a genomewide search for the autosomal segments shared among patients. Am J Hum Genet80: 1090–1102. 17503327
10. Thomas A, Camp NJ, Farnham JM, Allen-Brady K, Cannon-Albright LA, (2008) Shared genomic segment analysis. Mapping disease predisposition genes in extended pedigrees using SNP genotype assays. Ann Hum Genet72: 279–287. 18093282
11. Leibon G, Rockmore DN, Pollak MR, (2008) A SNP streak model for the identification of genetic regions identical-by-descent. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol7: Article16.
12. Knight S, Abo RP, Abel HJ, Neklason DW, Tuohy TM, et al. (2012) Shared genomic segment analysis: the power to find rare disease variants. Ann Hum Genet76: 500–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2012.00728.x22989048
13. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR, (2002) Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet30: 97–101. 11731797
14. Thompson EA, Kendall WS, Linag F, Wang J-S, (2005) MCMC in the Analysis of Genetic Data on Pedigrees. In: In Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Innovations and Applications. Singapore: National University of Singapore. pp. 183–216.
15. Bahlo M, Bromhead CJ, (2009) Generating linkage mapping files from Affymetrix SNP chip data. Bioinformatics25: 1961–1962. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp31319435744
16. Bellenguez C, Ober C, Bourgain C, (2009) A multiple splitting approach to linkage analysis in large pedigrees identifies a linkage to asthma on chromosome 12. Genet Epidemiol33: 207–216. doi: 10.1002/gepi.2037118839415
17. Nato AQ, Jr.Chapman NH, Sohi HK, Nguyen HD, Brkanac Z, et al. (2015) PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers. Bioinformatics31: 3790–3798. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv44426231429
18. Morris JA, Barrett JC, (2012) Olorin: combining gene flow with exome sequencing in large family studies of complex disease. Bioinformatics28: 3320–3321. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts60923052039
19. Bureau A, Younkin SG, Parker MM, Bailey-Wilson JE, Marazita ML, et al. (2014) Inferring rare disease risk variants based on exact probabilities of sharing by multiple affected relatives. Bioinformatics30: 2189–2196. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu19824740360
20. Ott J, Wang J, Leal SM, (2015) Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet16: 275–284. doi: 10.1038/nrg390825824869
21. Lander ES, Green P, (1987) Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A84: 2363–2367. 3470801
22. Wijsman EM, Rothstein JH, Thompson EA, (2006) Multipoint linkage analysis with many multiallelic or dense diallelic markers: Markov chain-Monte Carlo provides practical approaches for genome scans on general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet79: 846–858. 17033961
23. Hu H, Roach JC, Coon H, Guthery SL, Voelkerding KV, et al. (2014) A unified test of linkage analysis and rare-variant association for analysis of pedigree sequence data. Nat Biotechnol32: 663–669. doi: 10.1038/nbt.289524837662
24. Ionita-Laza I, Makarov V, Yoon S, Raby B, Buxbaum J, et al. (2011) Finding disease variants in Mendelian disorders by using sequence data: methods and applications. Am J Hum Genet89: 701–712. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.00322137099
25. Chung RH, Tsai WY, Martin ER, (2014) Family-based association test using both common and rare variants and accounting for directions of effects for sequencing data. PLoS One9: e107800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010780025244564
26. De G, Yip WK, Ionita-Laza I, Laird N, (2013) Rare variant analysis for family-based design. PLoS One8: e48495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.004849523341868
27. Madsen BE, Browning SR, (2009) A groupwise association test for rare mutations using a weighted sum statistic. PLoS Genet5: e1000384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100038419214210
28. Lee S, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M, Lin X, (2014) Rare-variant association analysis: study designs and statistical tests. Am J Hum Genet95: 5–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.00924995866
29. Cheung CY, Thompson EA, Wijsman EM, (2013) GIGI: an approach to effective imputation of dense genotypes on large pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet92: 504–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.02.01123561844
30. Saad M, Wijsman EM, (2014) Power of family-based association designs to detect rare variants in large pedigrees using imputed genotypes. Genet Epidemiol38: 1–9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.2177624243664
31. Matise TC, Chen F, Chen W, De La Vega FM, Hansen M, et al. (2007) A second-generation combined linkage physical map of the human genome. Genome Res17: 1783–1786. 17989245
32. Consortium TGP, (2010) A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature467: 1061–1073. doi: 10.1038/nature0953420981092
33. Kamphans T, Sabri P, Zhu N, Heinrich V, Mundlos S, et al. (2013) Filtering for compound heterozygous sequence variants in non-consanguineous pedigrees. PLoS One8: e70151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.007015123940540
34. Burdick JT, Chen WM, Abecasis GR, Cheung VG, (2006) In silico method for inferring genotypes in pedigrees. Nat Genet38: 1002–1004. 16921375
35. Liu F, Kirichenko A, Axenovich TI, van Duijn CM, Aulchenko YS, (2008) An approach for cutting large and complex pedigrees for linkage analysis. Eur J Hum Genet16: 854–860. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.2418301450
36. Cukier HN, Dueker ND, Slifer SH, Lee JM, Whitehead PL, et al. (2014) Exome sequencing of extended families with autism reveals genes shared across neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol Autism5: 1. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-5-124410847
37. Stittrich AB, Ashworth J, Shi M, Robinson M, Mauldin D, et al. (2016) Genomic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease in five families with multiple affected individuals. Human Genome Variation3.
38. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, et al. (2011) Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet12: 745–755. doi: 10.1038/nrg303121946919
39. Bureau A, Parker MM, Ruczinski I, Taub MA, Marazita ML, et al. (2014) Whole exome sequencing of distant relatives in multiplex families implicates rare variants in candidate genes for oral clefts. Genetics197: 1039–1044. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.16522524793288
40. Basu S, Di Y, Thompson EA, (2008) Exact trait-model-free tests for linkage detection in pedigrees. Ann Hum Genet72: 676–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00451.x18507652
41. Basu S, Stephens M, Pankow JS, Thompson EA, (2010) A likelihood-based trait-model-free approach for linkage detection of binary trait. Biometrics66: 205–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01270.x19459835
42. Tong L, Thompson E, (2008) Multilocus lod scores in large pedigrees: combination of exact and approximate calculations. Hum Hered65: 142–153. 17934317
43. George AW, Thompson EA, (2003) Discovering disease genes: Multipoint linkage analysis via a new Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Statistical Science18: 515–531.
44. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet81: 559–575. 17701901
45. Chung RH, Hauser ER, Martin ER, (2007) Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens. Genet Epidemiol31: 134–142. 17123303
46. Smith KR, Bromhead CJ, Hildebrand MS, Shearer AE, Lockhart PJ, et al. (2011) Reducing the exome search space for mendelian diseases using genetic linkage analysis of exome genotypes. Genome Biol12: R85. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r8521917141
47. Mullaney JM, Mills RE, Pittard WS, Devine SE, (2010) Small insertions and deletions (INDELs) in human genomes. Hum Mol Genet19: R131–136. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq40020858594
48. Ramu A, Noordam MJ, Schwartz RS, Wuster A, Hurles ME, et al. (2013) DeNovoGear: de novo indel and point mutation discovery and phasing. Nat Methods10: 985–987. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.261123975140
49. Kojima K, Nariai N, Mimori T, Takahashi M, Yamaguchi-Kabata Y, et al. (2013) A statistical variant calling approach from pedigree information and local haplotyping with phase informative reads. Bioinformatics29: 2835–2843. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt50324002111
50. Peng G, Fan Y, Wang W, (2014) FamSeq: a variant calling program for family-based sequencing data using graphics processing units. PLoS Comput Biol10: e1003880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100388025357123