Influence of Flow Behavior of Alginate-Cell Suspensions on Cell Viability and Proliferation

Tissue Engineering - Part C: Methods

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 652-662

  Ning, Liqun ^a   Guillemot, Arthur ^b   Zhao, Jingxuan ^a   Kipouros, Georges ^a   Chen, Xiongbiao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b Mécanique et Matériaux   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGINATE; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NEURONS; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); TISSUE; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ALGINATE SOLUTIONS; CELL SUSPENSION; FIBROBLAST CELLS; FLOW BEHAVIORS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; SKELETAL MUSCLE CELLS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL BIOPRINTING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ALGINIC ACID; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACID;

3T3 CELL LINE; ARTICLE; BIOPRINTING; CELL DAMAGE; CELL DEATH; CELL DENSITY; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SUSPENSION; CELL VIABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW RATE; FLOWMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHWANN CELL; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR RATE; SHEAR STRESS; SKELETAL MUSCLE CELL; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MOUSE; NIH 3T3 CELL LINE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGENERATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ALGINATES; ANIMALS; BIOPRINTING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACIDS; MICE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NIH 3T3 CELLS; REGENERATION; SCHWANN CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84978419839     PISSN: 19373384     EISSN: 19373392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0011     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Drury, J.L., and Mooney, D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24, 4337, 2003.
2. Langer, R., and Vacanti, J.P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920, 1993.
3. Coelho, P.G., Hollister, S.J., Flanagan, C.L., et al. Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis. Med Eng Phys 37, 287, 2015.
4. Gonçalves, E.M., Oliveira, F.J., Silva, R.F., et al. Threedimensional printed PCL-hydroxyapatite scaffolds filled with CNTs for bone cell growth stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2015 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33432.
5. Pfister, A., Landers, R., Laib, A., et al. Biofunctional rapid prototyping for tissue-engineering applications: 3D bioplotting versus 3D printing. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 42, 624, 2004.
6. Castilho, M., Rodrigues, J., Pires, I., et al. Fabrication of individual alginate-TCP scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by means of powder printing. Biofabrication 7, 015004, 2015.
7. Kang, A., Park, J., Ju, J., et al. Cell encapsulation via microtechnologies. Biomaterials 35, 2651, 2014.
8. Shim, J.H., Lee, J.S., Kim, J.Y., et al. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multihead tissue/organ building system. J Micromech Microeng 22, 085014, 2012.
9. Sachlos, E., and Czernuszka, J. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater 5, 39, 2003.
10. Li, M., Tian, X., and Chen, X. A brief review of dispensingbased rapid prototyping techniques in tissue scaffold fabrication: role of modeling on scaffold properties prediction. Biofabrication 1, 032001, 2009.
11. Murphy, S.V., and Atala, A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32, 773, 2014.
12. Bajaj, P., Schweller, R.M., Khademhosseini, A., et al. 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16, 247, 2014.
13. Draget, K.I., Skjåk-Bræk, G., and Smidsrød, O. Alginate based new materials. Int J Biol Macromol 21, 47, 1997.
14. Lee, K.Y., and Mooney, D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101, 1869, 2001.
15. Nicodemus, G.D., and Bryant, S.J. Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 14, 149, 2008.
16. Li, M., Tian, X., and Chen, X. Modeling of flow rate, pore size, and porosity for the dispensing-based tissue scaffolds fabrication. J Manuf Sci Eng 131, 034501, 2009.
17. Zhu, N., Li, M., Cooper, D., et al. Development of novel hybrid poly (l-lactide)/chitosan scaffolds using the rapid freeze prototyping technique. Biofabrication 3, 034105, 2011.
18. Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., and Ozbolat, I.T. Direct bioprinting of vessel-like tubular microfluidic channels. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 4, 020902, 2013.
19. Min, Z., Shichang, Z., Chen, X., et al. 3D-printed dimethyloxallyl glycine delivery scaffolds to improve angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Biomater Sci 3, 1236, 2015
20. Onoe, H., Okitsu, T., Itou, A., et al. Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions. Nat Mater 12, 584, 2013.
21. Cornock, R., Beirne, S., Thompson, B., et al. Coaxial additive manufacture of biomaterial composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biofabrication 6, 025002, 2014.
22. Kim, G., Ahn, S., Kim, Y., et al. Coaxial structured collagen-alginate scaffolds: fabrication, physical properties, and biomedical application for skin tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem 21, 6165, 2011.
23. Mironov, V., Kasyanov, V., and Markwald, R.R. Organ printing: from bioprinter to organ biofabrication line. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22, 667, 2011.
24. Orive, G., Hernández, R.M., Gascón, A.R., et al. Cell encapsulation: promise and progress. Nat Med 9, 104, 2003.
25. Rajaram, A., Schreyer, D., and Chen, D. Bioplotting alginate/hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds with structural integrity and preserved Schwann cell viability. 3D Print Addit Manuf 1, 194, 2014.
26. Chang Yan, K., Nair, K., and Sun, W. Three dimensional multi-scale modelling and analysis of cell damage in cellencapsulated alginate constructs. J Biomech 43, 1031, 2010.
27. Tallawi, M., Rai, R., Boccaccini, A.R., et al. Effect of substrate mechanics on cardiomyocyte maturation and growth. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 21, 157, 2014.
28. Desai, E.S., Tang, M.Y., Ross, A.E., et al. Critical factors affecting cell encapsulation in superporous hydrogels. Biomed Mater 7, 024108, 2012.
29. Nair, K., Gandhi, M., Khalil, S., et al. Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes. Biotechnol J 4, 1168, 2009.
30. Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., et al. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissueengineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials 35, 49, 2014.
31. Li, M., Tian, X., Schreyer, D.J., et al. Effect of needle geometry on flow rate and cell damage in the dispensingbased biofabrication process. Biotechnol Prog 27, 1777, 2011.
32. Li, M.G., Tian, X.Y., and Chen, X. Temperature effect on the shear-induced cell damage in biofabrication. Artif Organs 35, 741, 2011.
33. Ozbolat, I.T., Chen, H., and Yu, Y. Development of 'Multiarm Bioprinter' for hybrid biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30, 295, 2014.
34. Tian, X.Y., Li, M.G., and Chen, X.B. Bio-rapid-prototyping of tissue engineering scaffolds and the process-induced cell damage. J Biomim Biomater Biomedical Eng 17, 1, 2013.
35. Chang, R., Nam, J., and Sun, W. Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cellwriting. Tissue Eng Part A 14, 41, 2008.
36. Gupta, R., Truong, L., Bear, D., et al. Shear stress alters the expression of myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and myelin basic protein (MBP) in Schwann cells. J Orthop Res 23, 1232, 2005.
37. Ouyang, L., Yao, R., Chen, X., et al. 3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions. Biofabrication 7, 015010, 2015.
38. Li, M., Tian, X., Zhu, N., et al. Modeling process-induced cell damage in the biodispensing process. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 16, 533, 2009.
39. Tirella, A., and Ahluwalia, A. The impact of fabrication parameters and substrate stiffness in direct writing of living constructs. Biotechnol Prog 28, 1315, 2012.
40. Zehnder, T., Sarker, B., Boccaccini, A.R., et al. Evaluation of an alginate-gelatine crosslinked hydrogel for bioplotting. Biofabrication 7, 025001, 2015.
41. Lee, H., Ahn, S., Chun, W., et al. Enhancement of cell viability by fabrication of macroscopic 3D hydrogel scaffolds using an innovative cell-dispensing technique supplemented by preosteoblast-laden micro-beads. Carbohydr Polym 104, 191, 2014.
42. Secomb, T. Red blood cell mechanics and capillary blood rheology. Cell Biophys 18, 231, 1991.
43. Hall, P.A., and Woods, A.L. Immunohistochemical markers of cellular proliferation: achievenment, problems and prospects. Cell Proliferaiton 23, 505, 1990.
44. Levental, L., Georges, P., and Janmey, P. Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter 3, 299, 2007.
45. Janmey, P., and Mcculloch, C. Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9, 1, 2007.
46. Gu, Y., Ji, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. The influence of substrate stiffness on the behavior and functions of Schwann cells in culture. Biomaterials 33, 6672, 2012.
47. Close, R. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 52, 129, 1972.
48. Martin, R.B. Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones. J Biomech 24, 79, 1991.
49. van Meerloo, J., Kaspers, G.J., and Cloos, J. Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. In: Cancer Cell Culture. Hatfield, United Kingdom: Humana Press, 2011, pp. 237-245.