Three-dimensional printed PCL-hydroxyapatite scaffolds filled with CNTs for bone cell growth stimulation

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1210-1219

  Gonçalves, Elsa M ^a   Oliveira, Filipe J ^a   Silva, Rui F ^a   Neto, Miguel A ^a   Fernandes, M Helena ^b   Amaral, Margarida ^a   Vallet Regí, María ^c   Vila, Mercedes ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

3D printing; electrical properties; functional composites; mechanical properties; nano composites

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CARBON; CARBON NANOTUBES; CELL ADHESION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL GROWTH; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELECTRIC PROPERTIES; GROWTH KINETICS; HYDROXYAPATITE; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOCRYSTALS; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES; PRINTING; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE ENGINEERING; YARN;

3-D PRINTING; COMPOSITE SCAFFOLDS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL COMPOSITES; INTERCONNECTED NETWORK; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR; POLYMERIC MATRICES; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE;

3D PRINTERS;

HYDROXYAPATITE; MULTI WALLED NANOTUBE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; SILICON;

ARTICLE; BONE CELL; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL SPREADING; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL THERMAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; GROWTH STIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; OSTEOBLAST; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TRABECULAR BONE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

EID: 84978758756     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33432     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Navarro M, Planell J. Bioactive composites based on calcium phosphates for bone regeneration. Key Eng Mater 2010;44:203–233.
2. Cooper G, Mooney M, Gosain A, Phil G, Losee J, Huard J. Testing the “critical-size” in calvarian bone defects: Revisiting the concept of a critical-sized defect (CSD). Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;125:1685–1692.
3. Seitz H, Rieder W, Irsen S, Leukers B, Tille C. Three-dimensional printing of porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2005;74:782–788.
4. Navarro M, Michiardi A, Castaño O, Planell J. Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J R Soc Interface 2008;5:1137–1158.
5. Rezwan K, Chen Q, Blaker J, Boccaccini A. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006;27:3413–3431.
6. Hutmacher D. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues–state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci: Polym Ed 2001;12:107–124.
7. Leong K, Cheah C, Chua C. Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2003;24:2363−2378.
8. Butscher A, Bohner M, Hofmann S, Gauckler L, Müller R. Structural and material approaches to bone tissue engineering in powder-based three-dimensional printing. Acta Biomater 2011;7:907–920.
9. Mano J, Sousa R, Boesel L, Neves N, Reis R. Bioinert, biodegradable and injectable polymeric matrix composites for hard tissue replacement: state of the art and recent developments. Compos Sci Technol 2004;64:789–817.
10. Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 2002;295:1014–1017.
11. Geng Y, Hutmacher D, Feng L, Fuh J. Rapid prototyping of 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering using a four-axis multiple-dispenser robotic system L. Concurr Eng 2003;40:423–432.
12. Salgado A, Coutinho O, Reis R. Bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 2004;4:743–765.
13. Dubok V. Bioceramics: Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Powder Metall Met Ceram 2001;39:381–394.
14. Burg KJ, Porter S, Kellam JF. Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2000;21:2347–2359.
15. Sandino C, Planell JA, Lacroix D. A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 2008;41:1005–1014.
16. Huebsch N, Mooney D. Inspiration and Application in the evolution of biomaterials. Nature 2010;462:426–432.
17. Ju YM, Yu B, Koob TJ, Moussy Y, Moussy F. A novel porous collagen scaffold around an implantable biosensor for improving biocompatibility. I. In vitro/in vivo stability of the scaffold and in vitro sensitivity of the glucose sensor with scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;87:136–146.
18. Ercan B, Webster T. The effect of biphasic electrical stimulation on osteoblast function at anodized nanotubular titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2010;31:3684–3693.
19. Griffin M, Bayat A. Electrical stimulation in bone healing: Critical analysis by evaluation levels os evidence. Open Access J Plast Surgery 2011;11:e34.
20. Huang C, Chen X, Chen Z. Osteocyte: The impresario in the electrical stimulation for bone fracture healing. Med Hypotheses 2008;70:287–290.
21. Meng S, Rouabhia M, Zhang Z. Electrical stimulation in tissue regeneration. Appl Biomed Eng 2005, chapter 3, ISBN 978-953-307-256-2, Published: August 23, 2011.
22. Vila M, Manzano M, Vallet-Regi M. Carbon nanotubes: A solution forprocessing smart biomaterials. Key Eng Mater 2010;441:3–29.
23. Vila M, Cicuéndez M, Sánchez-Marcos J, Fal-Miyar V, Manzano M, Prieto C, Vallet-Regi M. Electrical stimuli to increase cell proliferation on carbon nanotubes/mesoporous silica composites for drug delivery. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013;101:213–221.
24. Supronowicz P, Ajayan P, Ullmann K, Arulanandam B, Metzger D, Bizios R. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating current stimulation. J Exp Med 2002;59:499–504.
25. Mata D, Oliveira FJ, Ferreira NM, Araújo RF, Fernandes AJS, Lopes MA, Gomes PS, Fernandes MH, Silva RF. Processing strategies for smart electroconductive carbon nanotube-based bioceramic bone grafts. Nanotechnology 2014;25:145602.
26. Bianco A, Cacciotti I, Lombardi M, Montanaro L. Si-substituted hydroxyapatite nanopowders-synthesis, thermal stability and sinterability. Mater Res Bull 2009;44:345–354.
27. Patel N, Best S, Bonfield W. A comparative study on the in vivo behavior of hydroxyapatite and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite granules. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:1199–1206.
28. Shor L, Darling A, Starly B, Sun W, Güçeri S. Precision extruding deposition of composite polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005:5–6.
29. Shor L, Güçeri S, Chang R, Gordon J, Kang Q, Hartsock L, An Y, Sun W. Biofabrication. 2009;1(1):015003.
30. Sarac A. The ratio of crystallinity and thermodynamical interactions of polycaprolactone with some aliphatic esters and aromatic solvents by inverse gas chromatography. Polym Bull 2005;53:349–557.
31. Arcos D, Rodríguez-Carvajal J, Vallet-Regí M. Silicon Incorporation in hydroxylapatite obtained by controlled crystallization. Chem Mater 2004;16:2300–2308.
32. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006;27:2907–2915.
33. Antonakos A, Liarokapis E, Leventouri T. Micro-Raman and FTIR studies of synthetic and natural apatites. Biomaterials 2007;28:3043–3054.
34. Gibson I, Best S, Bonfield W. Chemical characterization of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;44:422–428.
35. Elzubair A, Elias C, Suarez J, Lopes H, Vieira M. The physical characterization of a thermoplastic polymer for endodontic obturation. J Dent 2006;34:784–789.
36. Eswaraiah V, Sankaranarayanan V, Ramaprabhu S. Inorganic nanotubes reinforced polyvinylidene fluoride composites as low-cost electromagnetic interference shielding materials. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011;6:137.
37. Kim H, Himeno T, Kawashita M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. The mechanism of biomineralization of bone-like apatite on synthetic hydroxyapatite: An in vitro assessment. J R Soc Interface 2004;1:17–22.
38. Wiria FE, Leong KF, Chua CK, Liu Y. Poly-ε-caprolactone/hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication via selective laser sintering. Acta Biomaterialia 2007;3:1–12.
39. Dorj B, Won J-E, Kim J-H, Choi S-J, Shin US, Kim H-W. Robocasting nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite incorporating modified carbon nanotubes for hard tissue reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2013;101A:1670–1681.
40. Jiang W, Shi J, Li W, Sun K. Morphology, wettability, and mechanical properties of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with interconnected pore structures fabricated by a mini-deposition system. Polym Eng Sci 2012;52:2396–2402.
41. White A, Best S, Kinloch I. Hydroxyapatite/carbon nanotube composites for biomedical applications: A review. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2007;4:1–13.
42. Hench L. Bioceramics-From concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487–1510.
43. Bacakova L, Grausova L, Vacik J, Kromka A, Biederman H, Choukourov A, Stary V. Nanocomposite and nanostructured carbon-based films as growth substrates for bone cells. Adv Divers Ind Appl Nanocompos
44. Bacakova L, Grausova L, Vacik J, Fraczek A, Blazewicz S, Kromka A, Vanecekd M, Svorcik V. Improved adhesion and growth of human osteoblast-like MG 63 cells on biomaterials modified with carbon nanoparticles. Diam Relat Mater 2007;16:2133–2140.
45. Lee H, Shin US, Jin G, Kim H. Highly homogeneous carbon nanotube-polycaprolactone composites with various and controllable concentrations of ionically-modified-MWCNTs. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2011;32:157–161.
46. 2 for potential nanobiomaterials: Tunable properties using different phases. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2012;14:12844–12853.