The “open innovation” paradigm: A contingency perspective

Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 176-207

  Torkkeli, Marko T ^a   Kock, Carl Joachim ^b   Salmi, Pekka A S ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b IE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Competitive advantage; Open innovation; R D; Resource based view

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; GAME THEORY;

ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE; EXTERNAL CONSTRAINTS; OPEN INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; TYPES OF INNOVATIONS;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84978364281     PISSN: 20138423     EISSN: 20130953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3926/jiem.2009.v2n1.p176-207     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Afuah, A. (1998). Innovation management: Strategies, implementation, and profits. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419-451.
3. Arrow, K. J. (1964). Control in large organizations. Management Science, 10(3), 397-408.
4. Arrow, K. J. (1996). The economics of information: An exposition. Empirica, 23(2), 119-128.
5. Arthur, B. W. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131.
6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
7. Berkovitch, E., & Narayanan, M.P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 347-362.
8. Blonigen, B. A., & Taylor, C. T. (2000). R&D intensity and acquisitions in hightechnology industries: Evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 47-70.
9. Cohen W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
10. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing Open Innovation. Research Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
12. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a new paradigm. USA: Oxford University Press.
14. Chiesa, V., & Toletti, G. (2003). Standard-Setting strategies in the multimedia sector. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 281-308.
15. Coughlan, P. J. (2001). Competitive Dynamics in Home Video Games (K): PlayStation vs. Nintendo64. HBS case study 9-701-101 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1225/701101).
16. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
17. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
18. Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120-1153.
19. Ferretti, M., & Romano, C. (2006). Technological acquisition processes in product development of large companies. International Journal of Product Development, 3(2), 191-213.
20. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323.
21. Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333-350.
22. th, 2009, from http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/EXPORT/DL/20417.pdf
23. Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., & Sjöberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management, 22(2), 111–133.
24. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. N., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
25. Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. M. (2002). External sources of innovative capabilities: the preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 167-188.
26. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164.
27. Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58-66.
28. Knudsen, L. G. (2005). Determinants of ‘openness’ in R&D collaboration: The roles of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Paper presented at the DRUID-DIME Academy winter 2006 PhD-conference 26-28 January: “The Evolution of Capabilities and Industrial Dynamics”. Retrieved Jan 8th, 2009, from http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2006-1704.pdf
29. Kogut, B. (1989). The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(2), 183-198.
30. Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(2), 102-116.
31. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215.
32. Laursen K., & Salter A. (2005). The Paradox of Openness Appropriability and the Use of External Sources of Knowledge for Innovation. Paper prepared for the All-Academy Symposium “Open Innovation: Empirical Research on Locating and Incorporating External Innovations”, August 9, 2005, at the Academy of Management Conference 2005, August 5-10, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Retrieved Jan 8th, 2009, from http://www.cob.sjsu.edu/west_j/OpenInnovation/2005_Academy/LaursenSalter.pdf.
33. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Management differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
34. Leiponen, A. (2006). Cooperative strategies in the standardization of wireless telecommunications. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University. Retrieved Jan 8th, 2009, from http://emertech.wharton.upenn.edu/Agenda/SDO_Wharton.pdf.
35. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-338.
36. Lichtenthaler, U. (2004). Organising the external technology exploitation process: current practices and future challenges. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2/3), 255-271.
37. Lichtenthaler, U. (2006). Technology exploitation strategies in the context of open innovation. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1), 1-21.
38. Lichtenthaler, U. (2007a). Corporate technology out-licensing: Motives and scope. World Patent Information, 29(2), 117-121.
39. Lichtenthaler, U. (2007b). Hierarchical strategies and strategic fit in the keep-orsell decision. Management Decision, 45(3), 340-359.
40. Lieberman, M., & Montgomery, D. (1988). First mover advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1/Summer), 41-58.
41. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
42. Nash, J. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155-162.
43. Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21(1), 128-140.
44. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. N.N. 2007, Intel personal communication, 24 September.
46. N.N. 2007, Philips personal communication, 22 August.
47. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
48. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resourcebased view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
49. Philips. (2004). Research Password Magazine. Issue 19, Apr2004. Retrieved Jan 8th, 2009, from http://www.research.philips.com/password/download/password_19.pdf.
50. Philips. (2006). Research Password Magazine. Issue 27, May 2006. Retrieved Jan 8th, 2009, from http://www.research.philips.com/password/download/password_27.pdf.
51. Rivette, K. G., & Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the hidden value of patents. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
52. Sakakibara, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2-3), 117-132.
53. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
55. Tennenhouse, D. (2004). Intel’s open collaborative model of industry-university research. Research Technology Management, 49(4), 19-26.
56. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
57. Tschirky, H., Koruna, S. M., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2004). Technology marketing: a firm’s core competence? International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2/3), 115-122.
58. Tsai, K-H., & Wang, J-C. (2007). Inward technology licensing and firm performance: a longitudinal study. R&D Management, 37(2), 151-160.
59. van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Management, 36(3), 347-363.
60. Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Noorderhaven, N. (2002). External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13(6), 714-733.
61. Vanhaverbeke, W., Gelsin, V., & Duysters, G. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in technology-based alliance networks. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007, 1-6.
62. Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28(1), 63-80.
63. West, J. (2006). Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation? In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke & J. West (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 109-133.) USA: Oxford University Press.
64. Williamson, O. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.
65. Winter, S. (1995). Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines and replication. In C. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis (pp. 147-178). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
66. Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.