Supporting the adoption of electric vehicles in urban road freight transport – A multi-criteria analysis of policy measures in Germany

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 91, Issue , 2016, Pages 61-79

  Taefi, Tessa T ^a   Kreutzfeldt, Jochen ^a   Held, Tobias ^a   Fink, Andreas ^b  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electric vehicles; Multi criteria analysis; Transport policy evaluation; Urban freight transport

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; FREIGHT CARS; ROAD VEHICLES; ROADS AND STREETS; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURES; MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS; PASSENGER TRANSPORT; ROAD FREIGHT VEHICLES; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP; TRANSPORT POLICY; URBAN FREIGHT TRANSPORT;

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION;

ELECTRIC VEHICLE; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

GERMANY;

EID: 84977270991     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aasness, M.A., Odeck, J., The increase of electric vehicle usage in Norway – incentives and adverse effects. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 7, 2015, 34.
2. Aichinger, W., Elektromobilität im städtischen Wirtschaftsverkehr. 2014, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.
3. Amburg, B.V., Pitkanen, W., Best fleet uses, key challenges and the early business case for e-trucks: findings and recommendations of the e-truck task force. EVS26 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Los Angeles, California, 2012, 1–12.
4. Bakker, S., Trip, J.J., Policy options to support the adoption of electric vehicles in the urban environment. Transport. Res. Part D 25 (2013), 18–23.
5. Ball, M., Wietschel, M., The future of hydrogen – opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009), 615–627.
6. Ballantyne, E.E., Lindholm, M., Whiteing, A., A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs. J. Transp. Geogr. 32 (2013), 93–101.
7. Bjerkan, K.Y., Norbech, T.E., Nordtomme, M.E., Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transport. Res. Part D 43 (2016), 169–180.
8. Böhm, J., Wahler, G., 2012. Luftreinhalteplan für Hamburg, 1. Fortschreibung. Behörde für Stadt und Umwelt Hamburg. (last accessed on April, 15th 2015).
9. Bozem, K., Nagl, A., Rath, V., Haubrock, A., Elektromobilität: Kundensicht, Strategien, Geschäftsmodelle. 2013, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden iSBN: 978-3-658-02627-1.
10. Bozzoa, R., Concaa, A., Marangonb, F., Decision support system for city logistics: literature review, and guidelines for an ex-ante model. Transport. Res. Proc. 3 (2014), 518–527.
11. Bryman, A., Social Research Methods. 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York iSBN 9783642200717.
12. Driscoll, A., Lyons, S., Mariuzzo, F., Tol, R.S.J., Simulating demand for electric vehicles using revealed preference data. Energy Policy 62 (2013), 686–696.
13. Duarte, G., Rolim, C., Baptista, P., How battery electric vehicles can contribute to sustainable urban logistics: a real-world application in Lisbon, Portugal. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 15 (2016), 71–78.
14. Dudenhöffer, F., 6, 2013. Dieselfahrzeuge und Stickoxide. In: Ifo Schnelldienst. Ifo Institut. (last accessed on February, 14th 2015).
15. E-Mobility NSR, 2013. Comparative Analysis of European Examples of Schemes for Freight Electric Vehicles. Online. (last accessed on Febuary 10th, 2015).
16. EmoG, 2014. Gesetz zur Bevorrechtigung der Verwendung elektrisch betriebener Fahrzeuge (Elektromobilitätsgesetz – EmoG). Drucksache 80/15.
17. European Commission, 2011. White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System, Brussels.
18. Figenbaum, E., Fearnley, N., Pfaffenbichler, P., Hjorthol, R., Kolbenstvedt, M., Jellinek, R., Emmerling, B., Bonnema, G.M., Vagane, F.R.L., Iversen, L.M., Increasing the competitiveness of e-vehicles in Europe. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 7, 2015, 28.
19. Fraunhofer IML, 2010. Trendstudie Handelslogistik. EHI Retail Institute e. V. Köln.
20. Gärling, A., Thogersen, J., Marketing of electric vehicles. Busin. Strategy Environ. 10 (2001), 53–65.
21. Gass, V., Schmidt, J., Schmid, E., Analysis of alternative policy instruments to promote electric vehicles in Austria. Renew. Energy 61 (2012), 96–101.
22. Gemeente Amsterdam, 2011. Schone lucht voor Amsterdam.
23. Gemeente Amsterdam, 2013. Evaluatie amsterdamse maatregelen luchtkwaliteit.
24. Grausam, M., Müller, U., Ried, W., Sperling, C., Wolpensinger, H., 2014. Elektromobilität in Kommunen. Handlungsleitfaden. Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (BMVI), Berlin.
25. Green, E.H., Skerlos, S.J., Winebrake, J.J., Increasing electric vehicle policy efficiency and effectiveness by reducing mainstream market bias. Energy Policy 65 (2014), 562–566.
26. Hood, C., Margetts, H., The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. second ed., 2007, Palgrave Macmillan iSBN: 9780230001435.
27. Kley, F., Lerch, C., Dallinger, D., New business models for electric cars – a holistic approach. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 3392–3403.
28. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, 2015. Fahrzeugzulassungen (FZ) Bestand an Kraftfahrzeugen nach Umwelt-Merkmalen, 1 January 2015.
29. Langbroek, J.M., Franklin, J.P., Susilo, Y.O., The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 94 (2016), 94–103.
30. Lee, D.-Y., Thomas, V.M., Brown, M.A., Electric urban delivery trucks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 8022–8030.
31. Lützenberger, M., Masuch, N., Küster, T., Keiser, J., Freund, D., Voss, M., Hrabia, C.-E., Pozo, D., Fähndrich, J., Trollmann, F., Albayrak, S., Towards a holistic approach for problems in the energy and mobility domain. Proc. Comput. Sci. 32 (2014), 780–787.
32. Macharis, C., The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport. Eur. Transp., 2005, 114–126.
33. Macharis, C., Bernardini, A., Reviewing the use of multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: time for a multi-actor approach. Transp. Policy 37 (2015), 177–186.
34. McKinsey, 2014. Electric Vehicle Index July. (last accessed September, 23th 2015).
35. Menge, J., 2013. Relevance of commercial transport from a municipality's perspective. In: Arndt, W.-H. (Ed.), Difu-Impulse: Städtischer Wirtschaftsverkehr. Dokumentation der Internationalen Konferenz 2012 in Berlin (ISBN: 9783881185189).
36. Mercer, J., Prospect theory and political science. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 8 (2005), 1–21.
37. Merkel, A., 2013. Elektromobilität bewegt weltweit: Manuskript Angela Merkel. (last accessed on February 25th, 2015).
38. Mock, P., Yang, Z., 2014. Driving Electricfication – A Global Comparison of Fiscal Incentive Policy for Electric Vehicles. Tech. Rep., The International Council on Clean Transportation.
39. Morrissey, P., Weldon, P., O'Mahony, M., Future standard and fast charging infrastructure planning: an analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour. Energy Policy 89 (2016), 257–270.
40. Myklebust, B., 2013. EVs in bus lanes – controversial incentive. In: EVS27 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Barcelona, Spain.
41. NAPE, 2014. Nationaler Aktionsplan Energieeffizienz, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy.
42. NPE, 2012. Fortschrittsbericht der Nationalen Plattform Elektromobilität. Dritter Bericht. (last accessed on January 7th, 2015).
43. NPE, 2014. Fortschrittsbericht 2014 – Bilanz der Marktvorbereitung. (last accessed on January 7th, 2015).
44. Reiter, K., Wrighton, S., 2014. Potential to Shift Goods Transport From Cars to Bicycles in European Cities. (last accessed on February 24th, 2015).
45. Salama, P., Lubinsky, A., Roy, B., Ivanic, Z., 2014. Green Loading Zones to Suport Cost-Effective Zero-Emission Commercial Vehicle Operations in New York City. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2434.
46. Sprei, F., Brauener, D., 2011. Incentives Impact on EV Markets. Victoria Institute. (last accessed on April 15th, 2015).
47. Suksri, J., Raicu, R., Yue, W.L., 2012. Towards sustainable urban freight distribution – a proposed evaluation framework. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum 2012 Proceedings.
48. Taefi, T.T., Kreutzfeldt, J., Held, T., Fink, A., Strategies to increase the profitability of electric vehicles in urban freight transport. Leal, W., Kotter, R., (eds.) E-Mobility in Europe, 2015, Springer, Berlin, 367–388 iSBN: 9783319131931.
49. Taefi, T.T., Kreutzfeldt, J., Held, T., Konings, R., Kotter, R., Lilley, S., Baster, H., Green, N., Laugesen, M.S., Jacobsson, S., Borgqvist, M., Nyquist, C., Comparative analysis of European examples of freight electric vehicles schemes. Kotzab, H., Pannek, J., Thoben, K.-D., (eds.) Dynamics in Logistics, 2016, Springer iSBN 9783319235127.
50. Taniguchi, E., Tamagada, D., Evaluating city logistics measures considering the behavior of several stakeholders. J. East. Asia Soc. Transport. Stud. 6 (2005), 3062–3076.
51. Tenkhoff, C., Braune, O., Wilhelm, S., 2012. Ergebnisbericht der Modellregionen Elektromobilität 2009–2011. (last accessed on February 27th, 2015).
52. Trigg, T., Third age of electric vehicles. J. Int. Energy Agency 2 (2012), 1–2.
53. Trip, J.J., Konings, R., 2014. Supporting Electric Vehicles in Freight Transport in Amsterdam.
54. Umweltbundesamt, 2013. Kurzfristig kaum Lärmminderung durch Elektroautos. (last accessed on February 10th, 2015).
55. van der Steen, M., Schelven, R.V., Kotter, R., van Twist, M., van Deventer, P., EV policy compared: an international comparison of governments’ policy strategy towards e-mobility. Leal, W., Kotter, R., (eds.) E-Mobility in Europe, 2015, Springer, Berlin, 27–53 iSBN: 9783319131931.
56. Wermuth, M., 2012. Kraftfahrzeugverkehr in Deutschland 2010 (KID 2010), Schlussbericht.
57. Wietschel, M., Plötz, P., Gnann, T., Kühn, A., 2013. Markthochlaufszenarien für Elektrofahrzeuge. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe. (last accessed on April, 15th 2015).
58. Wolpert, S., 2013. City-Logistik – Bestandsaufnahme relevanter Projekte des nachhaltigen Wirtschaftsverkehrs in Zentraleuropa. Tech. Rep., Fraunhofer SCS.
59. 2 from road freight transport in London: trends and policies for long run reductions. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 1774–1786.