Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1330-1337

  Horton, Nicholas ^a   Garber, Ari ^a   Hasson, Henrietta ^a   Lopez, Rocio ^a   Burke, Carol A ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOVIPREP; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOATING; BOWEL MOVEMENT KINETICS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLON ADENOMA; COLON LAVAGE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTESTINE MOTILITY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COMFORT; PATIENT INCONVENIENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE DOSE REGIMEN; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SLEEP; SMELL AND TASTE PARAMETERS; SPLIT DOSE REGIMEN; TASTE DISORDER; TRAVEL; ADENOMA; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DEFECATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME FACTOR;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; CATHARTICS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DEFECATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SLEEP; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TRAVEL;

EID: 84977101045     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.273     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics,. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 7-30.
2. Levine JS, Ahnen DJ. Clinical practice. Adenomatous polyps of the colon. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2551-7.
3. Burke CA, Church JM. Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 565-73.
4. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-84.
5. Parra-Blanco A, Quintero E, Jimenez A. Good colon preparation guarantees a higher diagnostic yield of colonoscopy-timing is most crucial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 908.
6. El Sayed AM, Kanafani ZA, Mourad FH et al. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 36-40.
7. Khan MA, Piotrowski Z, Brown MD. Patient acceptance, convenience, and efficacy of single-dose versus split-dose colonoscopy bowel preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 310-1.
8. Jover R, Zapater P, Polania E et al. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 381-9.
9. Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 603-8.
10. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1528-45.
11. Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA et al. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1225-31.
12. Martel M, Barkun AN, Menard C et al. Split-Dose preparations are superior to day-before bowel cleansing regimens: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 79-88.
13. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Riccio G et al. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 313-20.
14. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1240-5.
15. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Saltzman JR, Cash BD et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 781-94.
16. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroentero logy guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 739-50.
17. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 142-50.
18. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ 3rd. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 3186-94.
19. Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 989-95.
20. Linden TB, Waye JD. Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 811-3.
21. Vanner S, Hookey LC. Timing and frequency of bowel activity in patients ingesting sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate and adjuvant bisacodyl for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2011; 25: 663-6.
22. Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ et al. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 515-20.