Postnatal bacterial succession and functional establishment of hindgut in supplemental feeding and grazing goats

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 93, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 3528-3538

  Jiao, J Z ^a,b   W, Z ^a,b   Guan, L L ^c   Tan, Z L ^a   Han, X F ^a   Tang, S X ^a   Zhou, C S ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal development process; Bacterial succession; Feeding system; Functional establishment; Hindgut

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL RNA; RNA 16S;

ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY FIBER; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; GOAT; INTESTINE; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; DIETARY FIBER; FERMENTATION; GOATS; INTESTINES; RNA, BACTERIAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;

EID: 84975744009     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8706     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abecia, L., A. I. Martin-Garcia, G. Martinez, C. J. Newbold, and D. R. Yanez-Ruiz. 2013. Nutritional intervention in early life to manipulate rumen microbial colonization and methane output by kid goats postweaning. J. Anim. Sci. 91:4832-4840. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-6142
2. Anderson, K., T. Nagaraja, and J. Morrill. 1987. Ruminal metabolic development in calves weaned conventionally or early. J. Dairy Sci. 70:1000-1005. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80105-4
3. Baldwin, R., K. McLeod, J. Klotz, and R. Heitmann. 2004. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the preand postweaning ruminant. J. Dairy Sci. 87:E55-E65. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70061-2
4. Bernalier-Donadille, A. 2010. Fermentative metabolism by the human gut microbiota. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 34:S16-S22. doi:10.1016/S0399-8320(10)70016-6
5. Combes, S., R. J. Michelland, V. Monteils, L. Cauquil, V. Soulie, N. U. Tran, T. Gidenne, and L. Fortun-Lamothe. 2011. Postnatal development of the rabbit caecal microbiota composition and activity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 77:680-689. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01148.x
6. Coverdale, J., H. Tyler, J. D. Quigley, and J. Brumm. 2004. Effect of various levels of forage and form of diet on rumen development and growth in calves. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2554-2562. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73380-9
7. Cummings, J. H. 1981. Short chain fatty acids in the human colon. Gut 22:763-779. doi:10.1136/gut.22.9.763
8. Denman, S. E., and C. S. McSweeney. 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 58:572-582. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x
9. Edwards, J. E., B. J. Bequette, N. McKain, N. R. McEwan, and R. J. Wallace. 2005. Influence of flavomycin on microbial numbers, microbial metabolism and gut tissue protein turnover in the digestive tract of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 94:64-70. doi:10.1079/BJN20051444
10. Eun, J.-S., and K. Beauchemin. 2005. Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 88:2140-2153. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72890-3
11. Faubladier, C., V. Julliand, J. Danel, and C. Philippeau. 2013. Bacterial carbohydrate-degrading capacity in foal faeces: Changes from birth to pre-weaning and the impact of maternal supplementation with fermented feed products. Br. J. Nutr. 110:1040-1052. doi:10.1017/S0007114512006162
12. Fernando, S. C., H. Purvis, F. Najar, L. Sukharnikov, C. Krehbiel, T. Nagaraja, B. Roe, and U. DeSilva. 2010. Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7482-7490. doi:10.1128/AEM.00388-10
13. Garcia-Gonzalez, R., S. Lopez, M. Fernandez, R. Bodas, and J. Gonzalez. 2008. Screening the activity of plants and spices for decreasing ruminal methane production in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 147:36-52. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.008
14. Gulino, L.-M., D. Ouwerkerk, A. Y. H. Kang, A. J. Maguire, M. Kienzle, and A. V. Klieve. 2013. Shedding light on the microbial community of the macropod foregut using 454-amplicon pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 8:E61463. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061463
15. Haenlein, G. F. 2001. Past, present, and future perspectives of small ruminant dairy research. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2097-2115. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74655-3
16. Hoover, W. H. 1978. Digestion and absorption in the hindgut of ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 46:1789-1799.
17. Hunt, K. M., J. A. Foster, L. J. Forney, U. M. Schütte, D. L. Beck, Z. Abdo, L. K. Fox, J. E. Williams, M. K. McGuire, and M. A. McGuire. 2011. Characterization of the diversity and temporal stability of bacterial communities in human milk. PLoS ONE 6:E21313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021313
18. Jami, E., A. Israel, A. Kotser, and I. Mizrahi. 2013. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J. 7:1069-1079. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.2
19. Jia, J., N. Frantz, C. Khoo, G. R. Gibson, R. A. Rastall, and A. L. McCartney. 2011. Investigation of the faecal microbiota of kittens: Monitoring bacterial succession and effect of diet. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 78:395-404. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01172.x
20. Jiao, J. Z., P. P. Wang, Z. X. He, S. X. Tang, C. S. Zhou, X. F. Han, M. Wang, D. Q. Wu, J. L. Kang, and Z. L. Tan. 2014. In vitro evaluation on neutral detergent fiber and cellulose digestion by post-ruminal microorganisms in goats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94:1745-1752. doi:10.1002/jsfa.6485
21. Kern, D., L. Slyter, E. Leffel, J. Weaver, and R. Oltjen. 1974. Ponies vs. steers: Microbial and chemical characteristics of intestinal ingesta. J. Anim. Sci. 38:559-564.
22. Klevenhusen, F., M. Hollmann, L. Podstatzky-Lichtenstein, R. Krametter-Frotscher, J. R. Aschenbach, and Q. Zebeli. 2013. Feeding barley grain-rich diets altered electrophysiological properties and permeability of the ruminal wall in a goat model. J. Dairy Sci. 96:2293-2302. doi:10.3168/jds.2012-6187
23. Koike, S., and Y. Kobayashi. 2001. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 204:361-366. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10911.x
24. Koike, S., J. Pan, Y. Kobayashi, and K. Tanaka. 2003. Kinetics of in sacco fiber-attachment of representative ruminal cellulolytic bacteria monitored by competitive PCR. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1429-1435. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73726-6
25. Krause, D., T. Nagaraja, A. Wright, and T. Callaway. 2013. Board-invited review: Rumen microbiology: Leading the way in microbial ecology. J. Anim. Sci. 91:331-341. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5567
26. Lane, M., R. Baldwin, and B. Jesse. 2000. Sheep rumen metabolic development in response to age and dietary treatments. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1990-1996.
27. Mändar, R., and M. Mikelsaar. 1996. Transmission of mother’s microflora to the newborn at birth. Biol. Neonate 69:30-35. doi:10.1159/000244275
28. Malmuthuge, N., P. J. Griebel, and L. L. Guan. 2014. Taxonomic identification of commensal bacteria associated with the mucosa and digesta throughout the gastrointestinal tracts of preweaned calves. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80:2021-2028. doi:10.1128/AEM.03864-13
29. Malmuthuge, N., M. J. Li, Y. H. Chen, P. Fries, P. J. Griebel, B. Baurhoo, X. Zhao, and L. L. Guan. 2012. Distinct commensal bacteria associated with ingesta and mucosal epithelium in the gastrointestinal tracts of calves and chickens. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 79:337-347. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01220.x
30. Mao, S., W. Huo, and W. Zhu. 2013. Use of pyrosequencing to characterize the microbiota in the ileum of goats fed with increasing proportion of dietary grain. Curr. Microbiol. 67:341-350. doi:10.1007/s00284-013-0371-0
31. Mao, S. Y., W. J. Huo, and W. Y. Zhu. 2014. Microbiome-metabolome analysis reveals unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of ruminal microbiota with increasing dietary grain in a goat model. Environ. Microbiol. In press. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12724
32. Metzler-Zebeli, B. U., S. Schmitz-Esser, F. Klevenhusen, L. Podstatzky-Lichtenstein, M. Wagner, and Q. Zebeli. 2013. Grain-rich diets differently alter ruminal and colonic abundance of microbial populations and lipopolysaccharide in goats. Anaerobe 20:65-73. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.02.005
33. Michalet-Doreau, B., I. Fernandez, and G. Fonty. 2002. A comparison of enzymatic and molecular approaches to characterize the cellulolytic microbial ecosystems of the rumen and the cecum. J. Anim. Sci. 80:790-796.
34. Orskov, E. R., D. Benzie, and R. N. Kay. 1970. The effects of feeding procedure on closure of the oesophageal groove in young sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 24:785-795. doi:10.1079/BJN19700080
35. Patra, A. K., and Z. Yu. 2014. Effects of vanillin, quillaja saponin, and essential oils on in vitro fermentation and protein-degrading microorganisms of the rumen. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98:897-905. doi:10.1007/s00253-013-4930-x
36. Petri, R. M., T. Schwaiger, G. B. Penner, K. A. Beauchemin, R. J. Forster, J. J. McKinnon, and T. A. McAllister. 2013. Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge. PLoS ONE 8:E83424. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083424
37. Rey, M., F. Enjalbert, and V. Monteils. 2012. Establishment of ruminal enzyme activities and fermentation capacity in dairy calves from birth through weaning. J. Dairy Sci. 95:1500-1512. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4902
38. Roth, B. A., N. M. Keil, L. Gygax, and E. Hillmann. 2009. Influence of weaning method on health status and rumen development in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 92:645-656. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1153
39. Saro, C., M. J. Ranilla, and M. D. Carro. 2012. Postprandial changes of fiber-degrading microbes in the rumen of sheep fed diets varying in type of forage as monitored by real-time PCR and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 90:4487-4494. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5265
40. Siciliano-Jones, J., and M. Murphy. 1989. Production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen and cecum-colon of steers as affected by forage: Concentrate and forage physical form. J. Dairy Sci. 72:485-492. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79130-X
41. Stevenson, D. M., and P. J. Weimer. 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75:165-174. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0802-y
42. Thompson, C. L., B. Wang, and A. J. Holmes. 2008. The immediate environment during postnatal development has long-term impact on gut community structure in pigs. ISME J. 2:739-748. doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.29