The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization: a review of five databases

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 486-500

  Widerberg, Oscar ^a   Stripple, Johannes ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DECARBONIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; MEASURING PERFORMANCE; MULTILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; QUANTITATIVE MODELING; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

COOPERATIVE SECTOR; DATABASE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84975307954     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.396     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Hsu A, Moffat AS, Weinfurter AJ, Schwartz JD . Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nat Clim Change 2015, 5:501–503.
2. Jagers SC, Stripple J . Climate governance beyond the state. Glob Gov 2003, 9:385.
3. Jordan AJ, Huitema D, Hildén M, van Asselt H, Rayner TJ, Schoenefeld JJ, Tosun J, Forster J, Boasson EL . Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat Clim Change 2015, 5:977–982.
4. Biermann F, Pattberg P, Zelli F . Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
5. Pattberg P . Public–private partnerships in global climate governance. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:279–287.
6. Ecofys. Climate initiatives database. Available at: http://www.climateinitiativesdatabase.org/. (Accessed December 20, 2015).
7. Widerberg O, Pattberg P . International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Glob Policy 2015, 6:45–56.
8. UNEP. Climate Commitments of Subnational Actors and Business: A Quantitative Assessment of Their Emission Reduction Impact. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); 2015.
9. Scott-Cato M, Hillier J . How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzean philosophy to Transition Towns. Environ Polit 2010, 19:869–887.
10. Weischer L, Morgan J, Patel M . Climate clubs: can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change? Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 2012, 21:177–192.
11. Widerberg O, Stenson DE . Climate Clubs and the UNFCCC; Study 2013:3. Stockholm: FORES; 2013.
12. Bulkeley H, Andonova L, Betsill MM, Compagnon D, Hale T, Hoffmann MJ, Newell P, Paterson M, Roger C, VanDeveer SD . Transnational Climate Change Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
13. Bulkeley H, Andonova L, Bäckstrand K, Betsill M, Compagnon D, Duffy R, Kolk A, Hoffmann M, Levy D, Newell P, et al. Governing climate change transnationally: assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 2012, 30:591–612.
14. Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V . Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2013, 38:361–375.
15. Hoffmann M . Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.
16. UNEP. The Emission Gap Report 2014. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); 2014.
17. Blok K, Höhne N, van der Leun K, Harrison N . Bridging the greenhouse-gas emissions gap. Nat Clim Change 2012, 2:471–474.
18. PwC. Low Carbon Technology Partnerships Initiative: Impact Analysis, WBCSD, 2015.
19. UNFCCC. The non-state actor zone for climate action (NAZCA). Available at: http://climateaction.unfccc.int/. (Accessed June 18, 2015).
20. Stewart RB, Oppenheimer M, Rudyk B. Building blocks for global climate protection. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2186541. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2013.
21. Barrett S . Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
22. Pattberg P, Stripple J . Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. Int Environ Agreem: Polit Law Econ 2008, 8:367–388.
23. Andonova LB, Betsill M, Bulkeley H . Transnational climate governance. Glob Environ Polit 2009, 9:52–73.
24. Bernstein S, Betsill M, Hoffmann M, Paterson M . A tale of two Copenhagens: carbon markets and climate governance. Millennium-J Int Stud 2010, 39:161–173.
25. Falkner R, Stephan H, Vogler J . International climate policy after Copenhagen: towards a “building blocks” approach. Glob Policy 2010, 1:252–262.
26. Dias Guerra F, Widerberg O, Pattberg P, Isailovic M . Mapping the institutional architecture of global climate change governance. Technical Paper R15-09. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM); 2015.
27. UNEP. Bridging the Emissions Gap. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); 2011.
28. UNEP. The Emission Gap Report 2012. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); 2012.
29. UNEP. The Emissions Gap Report 2013. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); 2013.
30. UNFCCC. Compilation of information on mitigation benefits of actions, initiatives and options to enhance mitigation action: list of selected cooperative initiatives. Available at: http://unfccc.int/meetings/bonn_jun_2013/items/7655.php. (Accessed February 3, 2014).
31. UNFCCC. Updated compilation of information on mitigation benefits of actions, initiatives and options to enhance mitigation ambition. Technical Paper FCCC/TP/2013/8. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2013.
32. UNFCCC. The Paris agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1; 2015.
33. Hale TN, Roger C . Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Rev Int Organ 2014, 9:59–82.
34. Abbott KW . The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 2012, 30:571–590.
35. Green JF . Order out of chaos: public and private rules for managing carbon. Glob Environ Polit 2013, 13:1–25.
36. Castán Broto V, Bulkeley H . A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Change 2013, 23:92–102.
37. UNFCCC. The United Nations framework convention on climate change. Available at: http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/2627.php. (Accessed June 28, 2011).
38. UNFCCC. Report on the workshop on increasing the level of ambition under paragraph 8 of decision 1/CP.17. FCCC/ADP/2012/INF.1; 2012.
39. Durham University. Department research projects. Available at: https://www.dur.ac.uk/geography/research/research_projects/?mode=project&id=432. (Accessed March 20, 2015).
40. Roger C, Hale T, Andonova L . How Do Domestic Politics Shape Participation in Transnational Climate Governance? BSG Working paper, BSG-WP-2015-001, University of Oxford, 2015.
41. Abbott KW, Hale T . Orchestrating global solutions networks: a guide for organizational entrepreneurs. Innovations 2014, 9:195–212.
42. UNFCCC. NAZCA: about. Available at: http://climateaction.unfccc.int/about.aspx. (Accessed December 20, 2015).
43. Moncel R, Asselt H . All hands on deck! Mobilizing climate change action beyond the UNFCCC. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 2012, 21:163–176.
44. Zelli F . The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. WIREs Clim Change 2011, 2:255–270.
45. Van de Graaf T . Fragmentation in global energy governance: explaining the creation of IRENA. Glob Environ Polit 2013, 13:14–33.
46. Bausch C, Mehling M . Alternative venues of climate cooperation: an institutional perspective. In: Hollo EJ, Kulovesi K, Mehling M, eds. Climate Change and the Law. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Netherlands: Springer; 2013, 111–141.
47. Widerberg O, Pattberg P . Non-state actors in a Paris agreement: are cities and companies bridging the ambition gap. Policy Brief. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM) and FORES; 2015.
48. Bulkeley H . Accomplishing Climate Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016.
49. Chan S, Falkner R, van Asselt H, Goldberg M . Strengthening non-state climate action: a progress assessment of commitments launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 242, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 216, 2015.
50. Pattberg P, Biermann F, Chan S, Mert A . Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Emergence, Influence and Legitimacy. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar; 2012.
51. Roelfsema M, Harmsen M, Olivier J . Climate Action Outside the UNFCCC. Policy Brief. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; 2015.
52. CISL, Ecofys. Better Partnerships: Understanding and Increasing the Impact of Private Sector Initiatives, 2015.
53. Mosteller D, Hsu A. Getting to two degrees: measuring what cities, companies, and others have promised. Available at: http://epi.yale.edu/the-metric/getting-two-degrees-measuring-what-cities-companies-and-others-have-promised. (Accessed June 18, 2015).
54. Biermann F, Pattberg P, Van Asselt H, Zelli F . The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Glob Environ Polit 2009, 9:14–40.
55. Victor DG . Toward effective international cooperation on climate change: numbers, interests and institutions. Glob Environ Polit 2006, 6:90–103.
56. Zelli F, Van Asselt H . Introduction: the institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 2013, 13:1–13.
57. Betsill M, Dubash NK, Paterson M, van Asselt H, Vihma A, Winkler H . Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Glob Environ Polit 2015, 15:1–10.
58. Widerberg O, Pattberg P . Companies in Cooperative Initiatives: Harnessing Non-State Climate Action Beyond Paris. Stockholm: FORES; 2015.
59. Pattberg P, Widerberg O . Transnational multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: conditions for success. AMBIO 2016, 45:42–51.
60. Klein N . This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2014.
61. Hulme M . Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
62. Boykoff MT . Who Speaks for the Climate?: Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
63. Lövbrand E, Stripple J . Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets. Crit Policy Stud 2011, 5:187–200.
64. UNFCCC. Compilation of information on mitigation benefits of actions, initiatives and options to enhance mitigation ambition. Technical Paper FCCC/TP/2013/4. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2013.
65. Harrison N, Höhne N, Braun N, Deng Y, Day T, Bartlett N, Dixson-Declève S . Enhancing Ambition through International Cooperative Initiatives. Copenhagen, DK: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2014.
66. Wouters KK . Wedging the Gap—An Analysis of the Impact of Existing Large-Scale Bottom-Up Initiatives for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation in 2020. Utrecht, NL: Utrecht University; 2013.
67. Galvanizing the groundswell of climate Actions. Available at: http://www.climategroundswell.org/. (Accessed June 15, 2015).
68. UNFCCC. Portal on cooperative initiatives. Available at: http://unfccc.int/focus/mitigation/items/7785.php.