Public-private partnerships in global climate governance

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 279-287

  Pattberg, Philipp ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY;

CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; GLOBAL CLIMATES; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; POLITICAL GOALS; PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; SET OF QUESTIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 79957539671     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.38     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bäckstrand K. Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Glob Environ Polit 2008, 8:74-102.
2. Okereke C, Bulkeley H, Schroeder H. Conceptualizing climate change governance beyond the international regime. Glob Environ Polit 2009, 9:58-78.
3. Biermann F, Pattberg P, Chan S, Mert A. Multistakeholder partnerships for sustainability: des the promise hold? In: Glasbergen P, Biermann F, Mol APJ, eds. Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007, 239-260.
4. Haas PM. Addressing the global governance deficit. Glob Environ Polit 2004, 4:1-15.
5. Gupta A. Transparency under scrutiny: information disclosure in global environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 2008, 8:1-7.
6. Chan S, Pattberg P. Private rule-making and the politics of accountability. Analyzing global forest governance. Glob Environ Polit 2008, 8:103-121.
7. Cashore B. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority governance. Governance 2002, 15:503-529.
8. Dingwerth K. The democratic legitimacy of public-private rule-making: what can we learn from the world commission on dams?. Glob Gov 2005, 11:65-83.
9. Pattberg P. The institutionalization of private governance: how business and non-profit organizations agree on transnational rules governance. Governance 2005, 18:589-610.
10. Andonova LB, Betsill MM, Bulkeley H. Transnational climate governance. Glob Environ Polit 2009, 9:52-73.
11. Bäckstrand K. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Eur Environ 2006, 16:290-306.
12. Schäferhoff M, Campe S, Kaan C. Transnational public-private partnerships in international relations. Making sense of concepts research frameworks and results. Int Stud Rev 2009, 11(3):451-474.
13. Bartley T. Certifying forests and factories: states, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Polit Soc 2003, 31:433-464.
14. Dingwerth K. Private transnational governance and the developing world: a comparative perspective. Int Stud Q 2008, 52:607-634.
15. Gulbrandsen LH. Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime?. Glob Environ Polit 2004, 4:75-99.
16. Meidinger EE. Forest Certification as a Global Civil Society Regulatory Institution. In:Meidinger EE, Elliott C, Oesten G, eds. Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification. Remagen: Verlag Kessel; 2003, 256-287.
17. Pattberg P. The forest stewardship council: risk and potential of private forest governance. J Environ Develop 2005, 14:356-374.
18. Brown HS, de Jong M, Lessidrenska T. The rise of the global reporting initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environ Polit 2009, 18:182-200.
19. Pattberg P. The influence of global business regulation: beyond good corporate conduct. Bus Soc Rev 2006, 111:241-268.
20. Bitzer V, Francken M, Glasbergen P. Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: Really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Glob Environ Change 2008, 18:271-284.
21. Betsill MM, Bulkeley H. Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the cities for climate protection program. Int Stud Q 2004, 48:471-493.
22. Levy DL, Newell PJ, eds. The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 2005.
23. Biermann F, Pattberg P, van Asselt H, Zelli F. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Glob Environ Polit 2009, 9(4):14-40.
24. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S, van Asselt H. Introduction: exploring and explaining the Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate. Int Environ Agreem-P 2009, 9:195-211.
25. Kersbergen K, van Waarden F. Governance as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. Eur J Polit Res 2004, 43:143-171.
26. Pattberg P, Stripple J. Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. Int Environ Agreem-P 2008, 8:367-388.
27. Rosenau JN. Governance in the twenty-first century global governance. Gob Gov 1995, 1:13-43.
28. Rieth L, Zimmer M, Hamann R, Hanks J. The UN. Global compact in sub-Sahara Africa-decentralization and effectiveness. J Corp Cit 2007, 7:83-99.
29. http://www.un.org/partnerships.
30. Kara J, Quarless D. Guiding principles for partnerships for sustainable development ('type 2 outcomes') to be elaborated by interested parties in the context of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). Paper presented at the Fourth Summit Preparatory Committee (PREPCOM 4). 2002. Bali, Indonesia.
31. Pattberg P, Szulecki K, Chan S, Mert A. Assessing the role and relevance of the renewable energy and energy efficiency partnership in global sustainability governance. In: Vollmer D, ed. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Sustainability Partnerships. Summary of a Workshop. Washington DC: US National Academies Press; 2009, 97-129.
32. http://webapps01.un.org/dsd/partnerships/public/partnerships/198.html.
33. Pattberg P. The role and relevance of networked climate governance. In: Biermann F, Pattberg P, Zelli F, eds. Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architectures, Agency and Adaptation.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010, 247-273.
34. Raustiala K. States, NGOs and international environmental institutions. Int Stud Q 1997, 41:719-740.
35. Biermann F. The case for a world environment organization. Environment 2000, 42:22-31.
36. Biermann F, Pattberg P. Global environmental governance: taking stock and moving forward. Annu Rev Environ Res 2008, 33:77-294.
37. Pattberg P, Enechi O. The business of transnational climate governance: legitimate, accountable and transparent? St Antony Int Rev 2009, 5:76-98.
38. Beisheim M, Dingwerth K. Procedural Legitimacy and Democratic Legitimacy: Are theGood Ones Doing Better? SFB Governance Working Paper 14, Berlin: Freie Universit ät Berlin.
39. Drezner DW. The global governance of the internet: bringing the state back. Polit Sci Q 2004, 119:477-498.
40. Biermann F, Pattberg P, Chan S, Mert M. Partnerships for Sustainable Development: An Appraisal Framework Global GovernanceWorking Paper Series. Amsterdam: The Global Governance Project; 2007.
41. Benner T, Reinicke WH, Witte JM. Multisectoral networks in global governance: towards a pluralistic system of accountability Gov Oppos 2004, 39:191-210.
42. Betsill MM. Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles Local Environ 2001, 6:393-406.
43. Betsill MM, Bulkeley H. Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the cities for climate protection program. Int Stud Q 2004, 48:471-493
44. Börzel TA. Organizing Babylon-on the different conceptions of policy networks'. Public Adm 1998, 76:253-273
45. Bulkeley H, Betsil MM, eds. Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. London:Routledge; 2003
46. Jagers SC, Stripple J. Climate governance beyond the state global governance. Glob Gov 2003, 9:385-399.