Alternative venues of climate cooperation: An institutional perspective

Climate Change and the Law

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 111-141

  Bausch, Camilla ^a   Mehling, Michael ^b  

^a ECOLOGIC INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^b Ecologic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975293256     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5440-9_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Katherine Michonski and Michael A. Levi, Harnessing International Institutions to Address Climate Change (New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations, 2010)
2. UN Security Council, Presidential Statement on Possible Security Implications of Climate Change, UN Doc. S/PRST/2011/15, 20 July 2011, available at http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10332.doc.htm (last accessed on 24 June 2012).
3. General Assembly, Resolution, “Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Humankind”, A/RES/65/159 December 2010, available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/un/eng/ares65159.pdf (last accessed 24 June 2012).
4. Camilla Bausch, “The Power of Plurality - On the Different Fora Contributing to the Post-2012 Negotiations”, in Michael Rodi and Michael Mehling (eds), Bridging the Divide in Global Climate Policy: Strategies for Enhanced Participation and Integration (Berlin: Lexxion, 2009), 53
5. Marianne Beisheim and Nils Simon, “Neuer Schwung für die Reform der internationalen Umweltgovernance”, 37 SWP-Aktuell (2010).
6. UNEP “Emission Gap Report”, UNEP, The Emissions Gap Report - Are the Copenhagen Accord Pledges Sufficient to Limit Global Warming to 2°Celsius or 1.5°Celsius? A Preliminary Assessment (November 2010).
7. David G. Victor, The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)
8. Ruth Greenspan Bell, “The Kyoto Placebo”, 24 Issues in Science and Technology (2006), 28
9. Christoph Bohringer and Carsten Vogt, “Dismantling of a Breakthrough: The Kyoto Protocol as Symbolic Policy”, 20 European Journal of Political Economy (2004), 597.
10. Camilla Bausch et al., “Efficient Climate Policy through Flexible Mechanisms”, in Michael Rodi (ed), Between Theory and Practice: Putting Climate Policy to Work, Vol. 1 (Berlin: Lexxion, 2008), 9.
11. UNFCCC, “Fact sheet: UNFCCC Secretariat”, available at http://unfccc.int/files/press/back-grounders/application/pdf/unfccc_secretariat.pdf (last accessed on 12 June 2012).
12. Antto Vihma, A Climate of Consensus: The UNFCCC Faces Challenges of Legitimacy And Effectiveness (Helsinki: FIIA, March 11, 2011), 2 seqq.
13. Sebastian Oberthür and Kelly Yasuko Matsumoto, “Managing Policy Contradictions between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols: The Case of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases”, in: Sebastion Oberthür and Olav Schram Stokke (eds), Institutional Interplay and Global Environmental Change: Interplay Management and Institutional Complexes: State of the Art and Perspectives (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009).
14. Philip Drost, Multilateral Environmental Agreements 2008: State ofAffairs and Developments, ed. (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2008), 211.
15. Jessica Leber, “Emissions: Decades-old Global Pact Morphs into Potent Climate Treaty”, ClimateWire, 26 November 2008
16. Guus J.M. Velders et al., “The Importance of the Montreal Protocol in Protecting Climate”, 104 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2007), 4814.
17. John M. Broder, “Experts Point to a More Proven Tool to Fight Warming”, International Herald Tribune, 9 November 2010, 2.
18. Andrew Light and Nina Hachigian, “Rise of the Green Dragon?”, available at http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/04/rise_green_dragon.html (last accessed on 12 June 2012).
19. Zhang Jin, “No Progress on Carbon Emission Cuts at MEF Meeting”, 27 May 2009, China Radio International, available at http://english.cri.cn/6966/2009/05/27/1461s488215.htm (last accessed on 10 June 2012).
20. Hillary Rodham Clinton, “Remarks at the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate”, 27 April 2009, available at http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/04/122240.htm (last accessed on 10 June 2012).
21. State Department, “Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate”, available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/04/122097.htm (last accessed on 10 June 2012).
22. Sascha Müller-Kraenner, “Weichenstellung statt Katerstimmung - Nach dem Kopenhagen Debakel braucht Europa eine effektive Klimastrategie”, 66 Internationale Politik (2010), 2-7.
23. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, “Magerer Ertrag in Deauville”, 27 May 2011, available at http://www.faz.net/f30/common/Suchergebnis.aspx?term=eingespielten+Rhythmus+und+der+Illusion&x=0&y=0&allchk=1 (last accessed on 10 June 2012).
24. David Runnalls, “Fossil Fuel Subsidies and the G20”, in John Kirton and Madeline Koch (eds), G8 & G20: The 2010 Canadian Summits (London: Newsdesk Media, 2010), 164, 164.
25. Trevor Houser, A Rolefor the G-20 in Addressing Climate Change? (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2010).
26. OECD, “Members and Partners”, available at www.oecd.org/document/25/0,3746, en_36734052_36761800_36999961_1_1_1_1,00.html (last accessed on 20 June 2012).
27. OECD, “Our Mission”, available at www.oecd.org/pages/0,3417, en_36734052_36734103_1_1_1_1_1,00.html (last accessed on 20 June 2012).
28. OECD, “Environment Directorate”, available at www.oecd.org/department/0,3355, en_2649_33713_1_1_1_1_1,00.htm (last accessed on 20 June 2012).
29. Daniel Bodansky, A Tale of Two Architectures: The Once and Future U.N. Climate Change Regime (Phoenix, Az.: Arizona State University, 2011), 18
30. Michonski M and Levi L, Harnessing International Institutions, supra, note 2, 1-3.
31. Robert N. Stavins, Joseph E. Aldy, Scott Barrett, “Thirteen Plus One: A Comparison of Global Climate Policy Architectures”, 3 Climate Policy (2003), 373
32. Valentina Bosetti et al., Modeling Economic Impacts of Alternative International Climate Policy Architectures: A Quantitative and Comparative Assessment of Architectures for Agreement, Discussion Paper 08-20 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, 2008);
33. Daniel Bodansky, International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches (Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2004).
34. Vihma V, A Climate ofConsensus, supra, note 8.
35. Robert N. Stavins, Optionsfor the Institutional Venuefor International Climate Negotiations, Issue Brief 2010-3 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, 2010).
36. Michonski M and Levi L, Harnessing International Institutions, supra, note 2, 3.
37. Daniel Bodansky, A Tale of Two Architectures: The Once and Future U.N. Climate Change Regime (Phoenix, Az.: Arizona State University, 2011), 18
38. Daniel Bodansky and Elliot Diringer, The Evolution of Multilateral Regimes: Implications for Climate Change (Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2010)
39. M. Michonski and L. Levi, Harnessing International Institutions, supra, note 2
40. Robert O. Keohane and David G. Victor, The Regime Complex for Climate Change, Discussion Paper 2010-33 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, 2010), 3-4.
41. Robert N. Stavins, Optionsfor the Institutional Venuefor International Climate Negotiations, Issue Brief 2010-3 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, 2010).