Fast and high resolution single-cell BRET imaging

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Goyet, Elise ^a,b,c   Bouquier, Nathalie ^a,b,c   Ollendorff, Vincent ^c   Perroy, Julie ^a,b,c  

^a INSTITUT DE GÉNOMIQUE FONCTIONNELLE   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHOTOPROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

CELL CULTURE; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

CELLS, CULTURED; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84974822953     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep28231     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boute, N., Jockers, R., Issad, T. The use of resonance energy transfer in high-throughput screening: BRET versus FRET. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23, 351-354 (2002).
2. Coulon, V. et al. Subcellular imaging of dynamic protein interactions by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Biophysical journal 94, 1001-1009, doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.117275 (2008).
3. Perroy, J. Subcellular dynamic imaging of protein-protein interactions in live cells by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Methods in molecular biology 591, 325-333, doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-404-3-19 (2010).
4. Welsh, D. K., Noguchi, T. Cellular bioluminescence imaging. Cold Spring Harbor protocols 2012, doi: 10.1101/pdb.top070607 (2012).
5. Loening, A. M., Fenn, T. D., Wu, A. M., Gambhir, S. S. Consensus guided mutagenesis of Renilla luciferase yields enhanced stability and light output. Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS 19, 391-400, doi: 10.1093/protein/gzl023 (2006).
6. Hall, M. P. et al. Engineered luciferase reporter from a deep sea shrimp utilizing a novel imidazopyrazinone substrate. ACS chemical biology 7, 1848-1857, doi: 10.1021/cb3002478 (2012).
7. Machleidt, T. et al. NanoBRET-A Novel BRET Platform for the Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions. ACS chemical biology 10, 1797-1804, doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00143 (2015).
8. England, C. G., Ehlerding, E. B., Cai, W. NanoLuc: A Small Luciferase Is Brightening Up the Field of Bioluminescence. Bioconjugate chemistry, doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00112 (2016).
9. Karlsson, E. A. et al. Visualizing real-time influenza virus infection, transmission and protection in ferrets. Nature communications 6, 6378, doi: 10.1038/ncomms7378 (2015).
10. Germain-Genevois, C., Garandeau, O., Couillaud, F. Detection of Brain Tumors and Systemic Metastases Using NanoLuc and Fluc for Dual Reporter Imaging. Molecular imaging and biology: MIB: the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging 18, 62-69, doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0864-2 (2016).
11. Verhoef, L. G., Mattioli, M., Ricci, F., Li, Y. C., Wade, M. Multiplex detection of protein-protein interactions using a next generation luciferase reporter. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1863, 284-292, doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.11.031 (2016).
12. Robertson, D. N. et al. Design and construction of conformational biosensors to monitor ion channel activation: A prototype FlAsH/BRET-approach to Kir3 channels. Methods 92, 19-35, doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.07.011 (2016).
13. Saito, K. et al. Luminescent proteins for high-speed single-cell and whole-body imaging. Nature communications 3, 1262, doi: 10.1038/ncomms2248 (2012).
14. Lam, A. J. et al. Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 9, 1005-1012, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2171 (2012).
15. Xu, C. et al. REV, A BRET-Based Sensor of ERK Activity. Frontiers in endocrinology 4, 95, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00095 (2013).
16. Lu, W. et al. Activation of synaptic NMDA receptors induces membrane insertion of new AMPA receptors and LTP in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuron 29, 243-254 (2001).
17. Faklaris, O. et al. Multicolor time-resolved Forster resonance energy transfer microscopy reveals the impact of GPCR oligomerization on internalization processes. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 29, 2235-2246, doi: 10.1096/fj.14-260059 (2015).
18. Stoddart, L. A. et al. Application of BRET to monitor ligand binding to GPCRs. Nat Methods 12, 661-663, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3398 (2015).
19. Tsien, R. Y., Bacskai, B. J., Adams, S. R. FRET for studying intracellular signalling. Trends Cell Biol 3, 242-245 (1993).
20. Wu, P., Brand, L. Resonance energy transfer: methods and applications. Anal Biochem 218, 1-13 (1994).
21. Shaul, Y. D., Seger, R. The MEK/ERK cascade: from signaling specificity to diverse functions. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1773, 1213-1226, doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.005 (2007).
22. Zhao, J., Nelson, T. J., Vu, Q., Truong, T., Stains, C. I. Self-Assembling NanoLuc Luciferase Fragments as Probes for Protein Aggregation in Living Cells. ACS chemical biology, doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00758 (2015).
23. Schaub, F. X. et al. Fluorophore-NanoLuc BRET Reporters Enable Sensitive In Vivo Optical Imaging and Flow Cytometry for Monitoring Tumorigenesis. Cancer Res, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3538 (2015).
24. Komatsu, N. et al. Development of an optimized backbone of FRET biosensors for kinases and GTPases. Molecular biology of the cell 22, 4647-4656, doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0072 (2011).
25. Perroy, J. et al. Direct interaction enables cross-talk between ionotropic and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283, 6799-6805, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705661200 (2008).