How does the propensity of living near rail transit moderate the influence of rail transit on transit trip frequency in Xi'an?

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 54, Issue , 2016, Pages 194-204

  Huang, Xiaoyan ^a   Cao, Xinyu Jason ^b   Cao, Xiaoshu ^a,c   Yin, Jiangbin ^a  

^a SHAANXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Propensity score; Residential dissonance; Residential self selection; Sustainability; Transit oriented development; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; METRO SYSTEM; NEIGHBORHOOD; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CHINA; SHAANXI; XIAN;

EID: 84973442919     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adler N.E., Boyce T., Chesney M.A., Cohen S., Folkman S., Kahn R.L., Syme S.L. Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am. Psychol. 1994, 49:15-24.
2. Arana P., Cabezudo S., Peñalba M. Influence of weather conditions on transit ridership: a statistical study using data from Smartcards. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2014, 59:1-12.
3. Arrington G., Cervero R. Effects of TOD on housing, parking, and travel. Transit Cooperative Research Program,Transportation Research Board of the National Academies 2008, (Washington, DC).
4. Babbie E. The Practice of Social Research 1998, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. eighth ed.
5. Bhat C., Guo J. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 2007, 41:506-526.
6. Bhattacharjee S., Goetz A.R. Impact of light rail on traffic congestion in Denver. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 22:262-270.
7. Böcker L., Dijst M., Faber J., Helbich M. En-route weather and place valuations for different transport mode users. J. Transp. Geogr. 2015, 47:128-138.
8. Cao X.J. Exploring causal effects of neighborhood type on walking behavior using stratification on the propensity score. Environ. Plan. A 2010, 42:487-504.
9. Cao X.J. Heterogeneous effects of neighborhood type on commute mode choice: an exploration of residential dissonance in the Twin Cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 2015, 48:188-196.
10. Cao J., Cao X. The impacts of LRT, neighbourhood characteristics, and self-selection on auto ownership: evidence from Minneapolis-St. Paul. Urban Stud. 2014, 51:2068-2087.
11. Cao J., Ettema D. Satisfaction with travel and residential self-selection: how do preferences moderate the impact of the Hiawatha Light Rail Transit line?. J. Transp. Land Use 2014, 7:93-108.
12. Cao J., Schoner J. Transportation Impact of Transitways: A Case Study of Hiawatha Light Rail Transit in Minneapolis 2013, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota.
13. Cao X.J., Schoner J. The influence of light rail transit on transit use: an exploration of station area residents along the Hiawatha line in Minneapolis. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2014, 59:134-143.
14. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Cross-sectional and quasi-panel explorations of the connection between the built environment and auto ownership. Environ. Plan. A 2007, 39:830-847.
15. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29:359-395.
16. Cao X.J., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: a case study of Northern California. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2009, 43:548-559.
17. Cao X.J., Xu Z., Fan Y. Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2010, 44:797-805.
18. Cervero R. Ridership Impacts of Transit-focused Development in California 1993, University of California Transportation Center.
19. Cervero R. Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts. Transp. Policy 1994, 1:174-183.
20. Cervero R. Transit oriented development's ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies. Environ. Plan. A 2007, 39:2068-2085.
21. Cervero R. Transit-Oriented Development transit-oriented development (TOD) and Land Use land use. Transportation Technologies for Sustainability 2013, 947-958. Springer.
22. Cervero R., Day J. Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China. Transp. Policy 2008, 15:315-323.
23. Chatman D.G. Does TOD need the T? On the importance of factors other than rail access. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2013, 79:17-31.
24. Chatman D.G. Estimating the effect of land use and transportation planning on travel patterns: three problems in controlling for residential self-selection. J. Transp. Land Use 2014, 7:47-56.
25. Cho G.-H., Rodríguez D.A. The influence of residential dissonance on physical activity and walking: evidence from the Montgomery County, MD, and twin cities, MN, areas. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 41:259-267.
26. Crano W.D., Brewer M.B., Lac A. Principles and Methods of Social Research 2014, Routledge.
27. Creemers L., Wets G., Cools M. Meteorological variation in daily travel behaviour: evidence from revealed preference data from the Netherlands. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2015, 120:183-194.
28. De Vos J., Derudder B., Van Acker V., Witlox F. Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 22:1-9.
29. Dittmar H., Ohland G. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development 2004, Island Press.
30. Garrett T.A., Castelazo M.D. Light rail transit in America: policy issues and prospects for economic development. Unpublished Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Research Department 2004.
31. Gu Y., Zheng S. The impacts of rail transit on property values and land development intensity: the case of no. 13 line in Beijing [J]. Acta Geograph. Sin. 2010, 2:010.
32. Giuliano G. Land Use Impacts of Transportation Investments-Highway and Transit. The Geography of Urban Transportation 2004, 237-273. The Guilford Press, New York. S. Hanson, G. Giuliano (Eds.).
33. Houston D., Boarnet M.G., Ferguson G., Spears S. Can compact rail transit corridors transform the automobile city? Planning for more sustainable travel in Los Angeles. Urban Stud. 2015, 52:938-959.
34. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Washington S., Turrell G. Residential dissonance and mode choice. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 33:12-28.
35. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Turrell G. Do dissonants in transit oriented development adjust commuting travel behaviour?. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2015, 15:66-77.
36. Knowles R.D. Transport impacts of Greater Manchester's Metrolink light rail system. J. Transp. Geogr. 1996, 4:1-14.
37. Krizek K. Pretest-posttest strategy for researching neighborhood-scale urban form and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2000, 1722:48-55.
38. Li C.-L. Propensity Score Matching in Observational Studies with Multiple Time Points 2011, The Ohio State University.
39. Lund H.M., Cervero R., Willson R.W. A re-evaluation of travel behavior in California's TODs. J. Archit. Plann. Res. 2006, 23(3):247-263.
40. Manaugh K., El-Geneidy A. Validating walkability indices: how do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood?. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2011, 16:309-315.
41. Naess P. Tempest in a teapot: the exaggerated problem of transport-related residential self-selection as a source of error in empirical studies. J. Transp. Land Use 2014, 7:57-79.
42. Oakes J.M., Johnson P.J. Propensity score matching for social epidemiology. Methods Social Epidemiol. 2006, 1:370-393.
43. Pan H., Zhang M. Rail transit impacts on land use: evidence from Shanghai, China. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2008, (2048):16-25.
44. Parady G., Takami K., Harata N. Connection between built environment and travel behavior: propensity score approach under a continuous treatment regime. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2014, (2453):137-144.
45. Renne J.L. Transit-Oriented Development: Measuring Benefits, Analyzing Trends, and Evaluating Policy 2005, Ph.D. Dissertation, Urban Planning and Policy Development Program in the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University.
46. Rosenbaum P.R., Rubin D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983, 70:41-55.
47. Rosenbaum P.R., Rubin D.B. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am. Stat. 1985, 39:33-38.
48. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P. The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Design 2004, 31:759-784.
49. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P. What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2005, 10:127-151.
50. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods?. J. Transp. Geogr. 2005, 13:83-99.
51. Sharma R., Newman P., Matan A. Urban rail-India's great opportunity for sustainable urban development. European Transport Conference 2015 2015.
52. Wang R., You Y. Review and prospect of urban subway construction. Technol. Outlook 2016, 5:34.