Heterogeneous effects of neighborhood type on commute mode choice: An exploration of residential dissonance in the Twin Cities

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 48, Issue , 2015, Pages 188-196

  Cao, Xinyu Jason ^a,b  

^a SHAANXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude; Built environment; Residential dissonance; Residential self selection; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; METROPOLITAN AREA; NEIGHBORHOOD; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN AREA; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84942616736     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Badoe D.A., Miller E.J. Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2000, 5:235-263.
2. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 2007, 41:506-526.
3. Bina M., Warburg V., Kockelman K. Location choice vis-à-vis transportation: apartment dwellers. Transp. Res. Rec. 2006, 1977:93-102.
4. Bohte W., Maat K., van Wee B. Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behaviour: a review of theories and empirical research. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29:325-357.
5. Cao X. Is alternative development undersupplied? Examination of residential preferences and choices of Northern California movers. Transp. Res. Rec. 2008, 2077:97-105.
6. Cao J., Cao X. The impacts of LRT, neighbourhood characteristics, and self-selection on auto ownership: evidence from Minneapolis-St. Paul. Urban Stud. 2014, 51:2068-2087.
7. Cao X., Schoner J. The influence of light rail transit on transit use: an exploration of station area residents along the Hiawatha line in Minneapolis. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2014, 59:134-143.
8. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29:359-395.
9. Chatman D.G. Estimating the effect of land use and transportation planning on travel patterns: three problems in controlling for residential self-selection. J. Transp. Land Use 2014, 7:47-56.
10. Cho G.-H., Rodriguez D.A. The influence of residential dissonance on physical activity and walking: evidence from the Montgomery County, MD, and Twin Cities, MN, areas. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 41:259-267.
11. Daykin A.R., Moffatt P.G. Analyzing ordered responses: a review of the ordered probit model. Underst. Stat. 2002, 1:157-166.
12. De Vos J., Derudder B., Van Acker V., Witlox F. Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 22:1-9.
13. De Vos J., Van Acker V., Witlox F. The influence of attitudes on transit-oriented development: an explorative analysis. Transp. Policy 2014, 35:326-329.
14. Filion P., Bunting T., Warriner K. The entrenchment of urban dispersion: residential preferences and location patterns in the dispersed city. Urban Stud. 1999, 36:1317-1347.
15. Frank L.D., Saelens B.E., Powell K.E., Chapman J.E. Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 65:1898-1914.
16. Greene W.H. Econometric analysis 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
17. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Washington S., Turrell G. Residential dissonance and mode choice. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 33:12-28.
18. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Turrell G. Do dissonants in transit oriented development adjust commuting travel behaviour?. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2015, 15:66-77.
19. Mokhtarian P.L., Cao X. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 2008, 42:204-228.
20. Næss P. Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: travel studies. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29:293-324.
21. Næss P. Residential location, travel, and energy use in the Hangzhou metropolitan area. J. Transp. Land Use 2010, 3:27-59.
22. O'Fallon C., Wallis I. Living in intensified urban environments: residential self-selection and travel behaviour. NZ Transport Agency research report 468, Wellington, New Zealand 2012.
23. Schoner J., Cao X. Walking for purpose and pleasure: influences of light rail transit, the built environment, and residential self-selection on pedestrian travel. Transp. Res. Rec. 2014, 2464:67-76.
24. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. Does dissonance between desired and current neighborhood type affect individual travel behaviour? An empirical assessment from the San Francisco Bay Area. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference (ETC), Strasbourg, France 2003.
25. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des. 2004, 31:759-784.
26. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods?. J. Transp. Geogr. 2005, 13:83-99.
27. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2005, 10:127-151.
28. Seltman H.J. Experimental design and analysis (free on-line textbook) 2015.
29. Sommer B.B., Sommer R. A practical guide to behavioral research: tools and techniques 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
30. TRB, IOM Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence 2005, Transportation Research Board and Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC.
31. Veall M.R., Zimmermann K.F. Pseudo-R2 Measures for Some Common Limited Dependent Variable Models. Sonderforschungsbereich 1996, 386.
32. Williams R. Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata J. 2006, 6:58-82.