Rail transit impacts on land use: Evidence from Shanghai, China

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2048, 2008, Pages 16-25

  Pan, Haixiao ^a   Zhang, Ming ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT; SUBWAY STATIONS;

ACCESSIBLE AREAS; CASE-STUDIES; CHANGE IN LAND USE; CHINESE CITIES; ECONOMIC THEORIES; INTENSIVE LAND USE; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; LAND DEVELOPMENT; RAIL TRANSIT; URBAN TRAVELS;

LAND USE;

EID: 53049107728     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2048-03     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kenworthy, J., and C. Townsend. An International Comparative Perspective on Motorization in Urban China: Problems and Prospects. IATSS Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2002, pp. 99-109.
2. Sperling, D. Personal Cars and China. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.
3. Zhang, T. W. Land Market Forces and Government's Role in Sprawl: The Case of China. Cities, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2000, pp. 123-135.
4. Knight, R., and L. Trygg. Evidence of Land Use Impacts of Rapid Transit Systems. Transportation, Vol. 6, 1977, pp. 231-247.
5. Li, W. L., and X. P. Yan. Urban Rail Transportation and Land Use Integration: Case Study of Guangzhou. Scientia Geographica Sinica (in Chinese), Vol. 22, No. 5, 2002, pp. 574-580.
6. Liu, J. L., and Y. Zhang. Analysis of Passenger Volume Effect of Land Use Along Urban Rail Transit. Transport Forum (in Chinese), Vol. 2. No. 2, 2004, pp. 54-57.
7. Pan, H., and C. Ren. Study of the Spatial Coupling between the Metro and Urban Activity Center-Case Study of Shanghai. Urban Planning Forum (in Chinese), No. 4, 2005, pp. 76-82.
8. Allport, R. Theme Paper 6: Investment in Mass Rapid Transit. In China Urban Transport Development Strategies, Proc. of a Symposium in Beijing (S. Stares and Z. Liu, eds.), Nov. 8-10, 1995.
9. Alonso, W. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
10. Muth, R. F. Cities and Housing: The Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1969.
11. Mills, E. S. Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1972.
12. Nelson, A. C. Transit Stations and Commercial Property Values: A Case Study with Policy and Land-Use Implications. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1998, pp. 77-95.
13. Weinberger, R. R. Light Rail Proximity: Benefit or Detriment in the Case of Santa Clara County, California? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Board, No. 1747, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 104-113.
14. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. Transit's Value-Added Effects: Light and Commuter Rail Services and Commercial Land Values. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 8-15.
15. Weinstein, B. L., and T. L. Clower. An Assessment of the DART LRT on Taxable Property Valuations and Transit-Oriented Development. Center for Economic Development and Research, University of North Texas, Denton, 2002.
16. Kim, J., and M. Zhang. Determining Transit Impacts on Seoul Commercial Land Values: An Application of Spatial Econometrics. International Real Estate Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005, pp. 139-164.
17. Rodriguez, D. A., and F. Targa. Value of Accessibility to Bogota's Bus Rapid Transit System. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2004, pp. 587-610.
18. Munoz-Raskin, R. Walking Accessibility to Bus Rapid Transit in Latin America: Does It Affect Property Values? The Case of Bogota, Colombia. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
19. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan, Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in Los Angeles County. Report prepared for National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute, Washington, U.C., 2002.
20. Chen, H., A. Rufolo, and K. J. Dueker. Measuring the Impact of Light Rail Systems on Single Family Home Values: A Hedonic Approach with GIS Application. Discussion Paper 97-3. Center for Urban Studies, Portland State University, Ore., 1997.
21. Armstrong, R. J. Impacts of Commuter Rail Service As Reflected in Single-Family Residential Property Values. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 88-98.
22. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. Land Value Impact of Rail Transit Services in San Diego County. Report prepared for National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 2002.
23. Benjamin, J. D., and G. S. Sirmans. Mass Transportation, Apartment Rent and Property Values. Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1996.
24. Landis, J., R. Cervero, S.Guhathukurta, D.Louteenheiser, and M.Zhang. Rail Transit Investments, Real Estate Values, and Land Use Change: A Comparative Analysis of Five California Rail Transit Systems. Monograph 48. Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, University of California at Berkeley, 1995.
25. Al-Mosaind, M. A., K. J. Dueker, and J. C. Strathman. Light-Rail Transit Stations and Property Values: A Hedonic Price Approach. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 90-94.
26. Chen, H., A. Rufolo, and K. J. Dueker. Measuring the Impact of Light Rail Systems on Single-Family Home Values: A Hedonic Approach with Geographical Information System Application. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 38-43.
27. Dueker, K. J., and M. J. Bianco. Light Rail Transit Impacts in Portland: The First Ten Years. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1685, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 171-180.
28. Lewis-Workman, S., and D. Brod. Measuring the Neighborhood Benefits of Rail Transit Accessibility. In Transportation Research Record 1576, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 147-153.
29. Voith, R. Changing Capitalization of CBD-Oriented Transportation Systems: Evidence from Philadelphia, 1970-1988. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 33, 1993, pp. 361-376.
30. Knaap, G. J., C. Ding, and L. Hopkins. Do Plans Matter?: The Effects of Light Rail Plans on Land Values in Station Areas. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, Sept. 1, 2001, pp. 32-39.
31. Transit Benefits 2000 Working Papers: A Public Choice Policy Analysis. Office of Policy Development, FTA, Washington, D.C., 2000.
32. Fejarang, R. A. Impact on Property Values: A Study of the Los Angeles Metro Rail. Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 1994.
33. Weinberger, R. Commercial Property Values and Proximity to Light Rail: Calculating Benefits with a Hedonic Price Model. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
34. Quantifying the Impacts of a Light Rail Transit Station on Adjacent Property Values. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge S ystematics, Inc., 1999.
35. Untermann, R. Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting Towns and Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling. Van Nostrand Reinhold, N.Y., 1984.